| Message ID | 20220927141504.3886314-5-alex.bennee@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
On 9/27/22 07:14, Alex Bennée wrote: > Although most KVM users will use the in-kernel GIC emulation it is > perfectly possible not to. In this case we need to ensure the > MemTxAttrs are correctly populated so the GIC can divine the source > CPU of the operation. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée<alex.bennee@linaro.org> > > --- > v3 > - new for v3 > --- > target/arm/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
On 27/9/22 16:14, Alex Bennée wrote: > Although most KVM users will use the in-kernel GIC emulation it is > perfectly possible not to. In this case we need to ensure the > MemTxAttrs are correctly populated so the GIC can divine the source > CPU of the operation. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > > --- > v3 > - new for v3 > --- > target/arm/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > void kvm_arm_vm_state_change(void *opaque, bool running, RunState state) > @@ -1003,6 +1004,10 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, > hwaddr xlat, len, doorbell_gpa; > MemoryRegionSection mrs; > MemoryRegion *mr; > + MemTxAttrs attrs = { > + .requester_type = MTRT_PCI, > + .requester_id = pci_requester_id(dev) > + }; Can we add a MEMTXATTRS_PCI() macro similar to MEMTXATTRS_CPU()? #define MEMTXATTRS_PCI(pci_dev) ((MemTxAttrs) \ {.requester_type = MTRT_PCI, \ .requester_id = pci_requester_id(pci_dev)}) So here we can use: MemTxAttrs attrs = MEMTXATTRS_PCI(dev); > @@ -1012,8 +1017,7 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, > > RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD(); > > - mr = address_space_translate(as, address, &xlat, &len, true, > - MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED); > + mr = address_space_translate(as, address, &xlat, &len, true, attrs); > > if (!mr) { > return 1; Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c index e5c1bd50d2..05056562f4 100644 --- a/target/arm/kvm.c +++ b/target/arm/kvm.c @@ -801,13 +801,14 @@ MemTxAttrs kvm_arch_post_run(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run) { ARMCPU *cpu; uint32_t switched_level; + MemTxAttrs attrs = MEMTXATTRS_CPU(cs); if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) { /* * We only need to sync timer states with user-space interrupt * controllers, so return early and save cycles if we don't. */ - return MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED; + return attrs; } cpu = ARM_CPU(cs); @@ -848,7 +849,7 @@ MemTxAttrs kvm_arch_post_run(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run) qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(); } - return MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED; + return attrs; } void kvm_arm_vm_state_change(void *opaque, bool running, RunState state) @@ -1003,6 +1004,10 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, hwaddr xlat, len, doorbell_gpa; MemoryRegionSection mrs; MemoryRegion *mr; + MemTxAttrs attrs = { + .requester_type = MTRT_PCI, + .requester_id = pci_requester_id(dev) + }; if (as == &address_space_memory) { return 0; @@ -1012,8 +1017,7 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD(); - mr = address_space_translate(as, address, &xlat, &len, true, - MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED); + mr = address_space_translate(as, address, &xlat, &len, true, attrs); if (!mr) { return 1;
Although most KVM users will use the in-kernel GIC emulation it is perfectly possible not to. In this case we need to ensure the MemTxAttrs are correctly populated so the GIC can divine the source CPU of the operation. Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> --- v3 - new for v3 --- target/arm/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)