| Message ID | 20221201091354.1613652-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [next] KVM: selftests: Fix spelling mistake "probabalistic" -> "probabilistic" | expand |
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022, Colin Ian King wrote: > There is a spelling mistake in some help text. Fix it. I assume you have a script/tool of some form to do spell checking? If so, can you point me at it? I'd love to incorporate something like that into my workflow. Thanks! > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
On 02/12/2022 17:21, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022, Colin Ian King wrote: >> There is a spelling mistake in some help text. Fix it. > > I assume you have a script/tool of some form to do spell checking? If so, can > you point me at it? I'd love to incorporate something like that into my workflow. https://github.com/ColinIanKing/kernelscan It needs an appropriate dictionary to be installed. It's very fast (but sometimes makes mistakes, I need to fix those!). ./kernelscan -k src_directory > mistakes.txt I normally run this across the entire kernel git repo on a daily basis, and diff the new results with the previous results using meld and figure out what needs to be fixed. You may be better off with using codespell Colin > > Thanks! > >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> >> --- > > Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
On 12/1/22 10:13, Colin Ian King wrote: > There is a spelling mistake in some help text. Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c > index c33e89012ae6..e9d6d1aecf89 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void help(char *name) > printf(" -x: Split the memory region into this number of memslots.\n" > " (default: 1)\n"); > printf(" -w: specify the percentage of pages which should be written to\n" > - " as an integer from 0-100 inclusive. This is probabalistic,\n" > + " as an integer from 0-100 inclusive. This is probabilistic,\n" > " so -w X means each page has an X%% chance of writing\n" > " and a (100-X)%% chance of reading.\n" > " (default: 100 i.e. all pages are written to.)\n"); Queued, thanks. Paolo
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Colin King (gmail) wrote: > On 02/12/2022 17:21, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022, Colin Ian King wrote: > > > There is a spelling mistake in some help text. Fix it. > > > > I assume you have a script/tool of some form to do spell checking? If so, can > > you point me at it? I'd love to incorporate something like that into my workflow. > > https://github.com/ColinIanKing/kernelscan > > It needs an appropriate dictionary to be installed. It's very fast (but > sometimes makes mistakes, I need to fix those!). > > ./kernelscan -k src_directory > mistakes.txt Ah, it's specifically checking messages to avoid false postives on code and whatnot. Neat! > I normally run this across the entire kernel git repo on a daily basis, and > diff the new results with the previous results using meld and figure out > what needs to be fixed. > > You may be better off with using codespell Heh, my kind of nitpicking people :-) MSDOS->MS-DOS Thanks a ton, that's exactly what I was looking for!
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Colin King (gmail) wrote: > > You may be better off with using codespell > > Heh, my kind of nitpicking people :-) > > MSDOS->MS-DOS > > Thanks a ton, that's exactly what I was looking for! For anyone following along and/or laughing at me, checkpatch even supports using codespell, e.g. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -g HEAD --codespell
On 02/12/2022 18:57, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Colin King (gmail) wrote: >>> You may be better off with using codespell >> >> Heh, my kind of nitpicking people :-) >> >> MSDOS->MS-DOS >> >> Thanks a ton, that's exactly what I was looking for! > > For anyone following along and/or laughing at me, checkpatch even supports using > codespell, e.g. > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -g HEAD --codespell checkpatch also uses a misspelling dictionary that I occasionally contribute to with common spelling mistakes that I find and fix. Colin
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c index c33e89012ae6..e9d6d1aecf89 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void help(char *name) printf(" -x: Split the memory region into this number of memslots.\n" " (default: 1)\n"); printf(" -w: specify the percentage of pages which should be written to\n" - " as an integer from 0-100 inclusive. This is probabalistic,\n" + " as an integer from 0-100 inclusive. This is probabilistic,\n" " so -w X means each page has an X%% chance of writing\n" " and a (100-X)%% chance of reading.\n" " (default: 100 i.e. all pages are written to.)\n");
There is a spelling mistake in some help text. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)