diff mbox series

[RFC,18/37] KVM: x86/mmu: Add common API for creating TDP PTEs

Message ID 20221208193857.4090582-19-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: Refactor the KVM/x86 TDP MMU into common code | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack Dec. 8, 2022, 7:38 p.m. UTC
Introduce an API for construction of TDP PTEs.

- tdp_mmu_make_leaf_pte()
- tdp_mmu_make_nonleaf_pte()
- tdp_mmu_make_huge_page_split_pte()
- tdp_mmu_make_changed_pte_notifier_pte()

This will be used in a future commit to move the TDP MMU to common code,
while PTE construction will stay in the architecture-specific code.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm/tdp_pgtable.h | 10 +++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c             | 18 +++++--------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm/tdp_pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm/tdp_pgtable.h
index c5c4e4cab24a..ff2691ced38b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm/tdp_pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm/tdp_pgtable.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ 
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_types.h>
+#include <kvm/mmu_types.h>
 
 struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_root(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
@@ -57,4 +58,13 @@  kvm_pfn_t tdp_pte_to_pfn(u64 pte);
 
 void tdp_pte_check_leaf_invariants(u64 pte);
 
+struct tdp_iter;
+
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_leaf_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
+			  struct tdp_iter *iter, bool *wrprot);
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_nonleaf_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_changed_pte_notifier_pte(struct tdp_iter *iter,
+					  struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_huge_page_split_pte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
+				     struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index);
 #endif /* !__ASM_KVM_TDP_PGTABLE_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 8155a9e79203..0172b0e44817 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1057,17 +1057,13 @@  static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					  struct tdp_iter *iter)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
-	u64 new_spte;
 	int ret = RET_PF_FIXED;
 	bool wrprot = false;
+	u64 new_spte;
 
 	WARN_ON(sp->role.level != fault->goal_level);
-	if (unlikely(!fault->slot))
-		new_spte = make_mmio_spte(vcpu, iter->gfn, ACC_ALL);
-	else
-		wrprot = make_spte(vcpu, sp, fault->slot, ACC_ALL, iter->gfn,
-					 fault->pfn, iter->old_spte, fault->prefetch, true,
-					 fault->map_writable, &new_spte);
+
+	new_spte = tdp_mmu_make_leaf_pte(vcpu, fault, iter, &wrprot);
 
 	if (new_spte == iter->old_spte)
 		ret = RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
@@ -1117,7 +1113,7 @@  static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static int tdp_mmu_link_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 			   struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, bool shared)
 {
-	u64 spte = make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, !kvm_ad_enabled());
+	u64 spte = tdp_mmu_make_nonleaf_pte(sp);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (shared) {
@@ -1312,9 +1308,7 @@  static bool set_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, 0);
 
 	if (!pte_write(range->pte)) {
-		new_spte = kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(iter->old_spte,
-								  pte_pfn(range->pte));
-
+		new_spte = tdp_mmu_make_changed_pte_notifier_pte(iter, range);
 		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, new_spte);
 	}
 
@@ -1466,7 +1460,7 @@  static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	 * not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < TDP_PTES_PER_PAGE; i++)
-		sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, i);
+		sp->spt[i] = tdp_mmu_make_huge_page_split_pte(kvm, huge_spte, sp, i);
 
 	/*
 	 * Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c
index 97cc900e8818..e036ba0c6bee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_pgtable.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 
 #include "mmu.h"
 #include "spte.h"
+#include "tdp_iter.h"
 
 /* Removed SPTEs must not be misconstrued as shadow present PTEs. */
 static_assert(!(REMOVED_TDP_PTE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK));
@@ -75,3 +76,38 @@  void tdp_pte_check_leaf_invariants(u64 pte)
 	check_spte_writable_invariants(pte);
 }
 
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_leaf_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			  struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
+			  struct tdp_iter *iter,
+			  bool *wrprot)
+{
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	u64 new_spte;
+
+	if (unlikely(!fault->slot))
+		return make_mmio_spte(vcpu, iter->gfn, ACC_ALL);
+
+	*wrprot = make_spte(vcpu, sp, fault->slot, ACC_ALL, iter->gfn,
+			    fault->pfn, iter->old_spte, fault->prefetch, true,
+			    fault->map_writable, &new_spte);
+
+	return new_spte;
+}
+
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_nonleaf_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+	return make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, !kvm_ad_enabled());
+}
+
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_changed_pte_notifier_pte(struct tdp_iter *iter,
+					  struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
+{
+	return kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(iter->old_spte,
+						      pte_pfn(range->pte));
+}
+
+u64 tdp_mmu_make_huge_page_split_pte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
+				     struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
+{
+	return make_huge_page_split_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, index);
+}