Message ID | 20230413-b4-vsock-dgram-v2-2-079cc7cee62e@bytedance.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | virtio/vsock: support datagrams | expand |
Hi Bobby, > /* The feature bitmap for virtio vsock */ > #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET 1 /* SOCK_SEQPACKET supported */ > +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM 2 /* Host support dgram vsock */ Seems that bit 2 is already taken by VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM. https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/26ed30ccb049fd51d6e20aad3de2807d678edb3a
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 08:47:52AM +0000, Alvaro Karsz wrote: > Hi Bobby, > > > /* The feature bitmap for virtio vsock */ > > #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET 1 /* SOCK_SEQPACKET supported */ > > +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM 2 /* Host support dgram vsock */ > > Seems that bit 2 is already taken by VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM. > > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/26ed30ccb049fd51d6e20aad3de2807d678edb3a Right! I'll bump that in the next rev. Thanks, Bobby
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:25:58AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > This commit adds a feature bit for virtio vsock to support datagrams. > > This commit should not be applied without first applying the commit > > that implements datagrams for virtio. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com> > > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com> > > --- > > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ++- > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > index dff6ee1c479b..028cf079225e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c > > @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ > > enum { > > VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES | > > (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | > > - (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET) > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET) | > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM) > > }; > > > > enum { > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h > > index 331be28b1d30..0975b9c88292 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h > > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ > > > > /* The feature bitmap for virtio vsock */ > > #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET 1 /* SOCK_SEQPACKET supported */ > > +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM 2 /* Host support dgram vsock */ > > > > struct virtio_vsock_config { > > __le64 guest_cid; > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > > index 582c6c0f788f..bb43eea9a6f9 100644 > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport; /* forward declaration */ > > struct virtio_vsock { > > struct virtio_device *vdev; > > struct virtqueue *vqs[VSOCK_VQ_MAX]; > > + bool has_dgram; > > > > /* Virtqueue processing is deferred to a workqueue */ > > struct work_struct tx_work; > > @@ -640,7 +641,6 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > } > > > > vsock->vdev = vdev; > > - > > vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; > > vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; > > atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); > > @@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET)) > > vsock->seqpacket_allow = true; > > > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM)) > > + vsock->has_dgram = true; > > This is unused for now, but I think the idea is to use in > virtio_transport_dgram_allow(), right? > > I would follow `seqpacket_allow` in this case. > Got it, thanks. > Thanks, > Stefano > > > + > > vdev->priv = vsock; > > > > ret = virtio_vsock_vqs_init(vsock); > > @@ -749,7 +752,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > > }; > > > > static unsigned int features[] = { > > - VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET > > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET, > > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM > > }; > > > > static struct virtio_driver virtio_vsock_driver = { > > > > -- > > 2.30.2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:25:58AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >This commit adds a feature bit for virtio vsock to support datagrams. >This commit should not be applied without first applying the commit >that implements datagrams for virtio. > >Signed-off-by: Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com> >Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com> >--- > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ++- > include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 8 ++++++-- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c >index dff6ee1c479b..028cf079225e 100644 >--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c >+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c >@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ > enum { > VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES | > (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | >- (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET) >+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET) | >+ (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM) > }; > > enum { >diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h >index 331be28b1d30..0975b9c88292 100644 >--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h >+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h >@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ > > /* The feature bitmap for virtio vsock */ > #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET 1 /* SOCK_SEQPACKET supported */ >+#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM 2 /* Host support dgram vsock */ > > struct virtio_vsock_config { > __le64 guest_cid; >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >index 582c6c0f788f..bb43eea9a6f9 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport; /* forward declaration */ > struct virtio_vsock { > struct virtio_device *vdev; > struct virtqueue *vqs[VSOCK_VQ_MAX]; >+ bool has_dgram; > > /* Virtqueue processing is deferred to a workqueue */ > struct work_struct tx_work; >@@ -640,7 +641,6 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > } > > vsock->vdev = vdev; >- > vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; > vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; > atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); >@@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET)) > vsock->seqpacket_allow = true; > >+ if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM)) >+ vsock->has_dgram = true; This is unused for now, but I think the idea is to use in virtio_transport_dgram_allow(), right? I would follow `seqpacket_allow` in this case. Thanks, Stefano >+ > vdev->priv = vsock; > > ret = virtio_vsock_vqs_init(vsock); >@@ -749,7 +752,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > }; > > static unsigned int features[] = { >- VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET >+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET, >+ VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM > }; > > static struct virtio_driver virtio_vsock_driver = { > >-- >2.30.2 >
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index dff6ee1c479b..028cf079225e 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ enum { VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES = VHOST_FEATURES | (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | - (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET) + (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET) | + (1ULL << VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM) }; enum { diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h index 331be28b1d30..0975b9c88292 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ /* The feature bitmap for virtio vsock */ #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET 1 /* SOCK_SEQPACKET supported */ +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM 2 /* Host support dgram vsock */ struct virtio_vsock_config { __le64 guest_cid; diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c index 582c6c0f788f..bb43eea9a6f9 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport; /* forward declaration */ struct virtio_vsock { struct virtio_device *vdev; struct virtqueue *vqs[VSOCK_VQ_MAX]; + bool has_dgram; /* Virtqueue processing is deferred to a workqueue */ struct work_struct tx_work; @@ -640,7 +641,6 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) } vsock->vdev = vdev; - vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); @@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET)) vsock->seqpacket_allow = true; + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM)) + vsock->has_dgram = true; + vdev->priv = vsock; ret = virtio_vsock_vqs_init(vsock); @@ -749,7 +752,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { }; static unsigned int features[] = { - VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET, + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM }; static struct virtio_driver virtio_vsock_driver = {