Message ID | 20230628001356.2706-1-namit@vmware.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | .debug ignore - to squash with efi:keep efi | expand |
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:13:48AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: > From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Missing s-o-b. > > --- > .gitignore | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > index 29f352c..2168e01 100644 > --- a/.gitignore > +++ b/.gitignore > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ tags > *.flat > *.efi > *.elf > +*.debug > *.patch > .pc > patches > -- > 2.34.1 > The patch threading is busted. Everything in the thread, including the cover letter, is in reply to this patch. Thanks, drew
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:19:03AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:13:48AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: > > From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> > > Missing s-o-b. > > > > > --- > > .gitignore | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > > index 29f352c..2168e01 100644 > > --- a/.gitignore > > +++ b/.gitignore > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ tags > > *.flat > > *.efi > > *.elf > > +*.debug > > *.patch > > .pc > > patches > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > The patch threading is busted. Everything in the thread, including the > cover letter, is in reply to this patch. > OK, I see the .gitignore hunk in patch 1, which is good, since it certainly doesn't need its own patch. I'll just ignore this "patch". Thanks, drew
> On Jun 28, 2023, at 1:22 AM, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> wrote: > > !! External Email > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:19:03AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:13:48AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: >>> From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> >> >> Missing s-o-b. >> >>> >>> --- >>> .gitignore | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>> index 29f352c..2168e01 100644 >>> --- a/.gitignore >>> +++ b/.gitignore >>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ tags >>> *.flat >>> *.efi >>> *.elf >>> +*.debug >>> *.patch >>> .pc >>> patches >>> -- >>> 2.34.1 >>> >> >> The patch threading is busted. Everything in the thread, including the >> cover letter, is in reply to this patch. >> > > OK, I see the .gitignore hunk in patch 1, which is good, since it > certainly doesn't need its own patch. I'll just ignore this "patch”. Embarrassing… Will send v4.
> On Jun 28, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jun 28, 2023, at 1:22 AM, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> wrote: >> >> OK, I see the .gitignore hunk in patch 1, which is good, since it >> certainly doesn't need its own patch. I'll just ignore this "patch”. > > Embarrassing… Will send v4. My double mistake. So I see this patch was not supposed to be sent, but other than that - you should have the series. Let me know if anything is wrong (as otherwise I won’t send v4).
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 05:33:52PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: > > > > On Jun 28, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Jun 28, 2023, at 1:22 AM, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> wrote: > >> > >> OK, I see the .gitignore hunk in patch 1, which is good, since it > >> certainly doesn't need its own patch. I'll just ignore this "patch”. > > > > Embarrassing… Will send v4. > > My double mistake. So I see this patch was not supposed to be sent, but other > than that - you should have the series. Let me know if anything is wrong > (as otherwise I won’t send v4). The series looks good. I plan to queue it, but was hoping to see some acks from x86 and maybe ppc people first. (I had to switch to this email address because I can't authenticate to the mail service used for my @linux.dev address right now... Hopefully that'll get resolved soon.) Thanks, drew
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 29f352c..2168e01 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ tags *.flat *.efi *.elf +*.debug *.patch .pc patches
From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> --- .gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)