| Message ID | 20230801222629.210929-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISC-V: KVM: change get_reg/set_reg error codes | expand |
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c index bd4998c3897b..67e1e9b0fd7e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_config(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, vcpu->arch.isa[0] = reg_val; kvm_riscv_vcpu_fp_reset(vcpu); } else { - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + return -EBUSY; } break; case KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(zicbom_block_size): @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int riscv_vcpu_set_isa_ext_single(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return -EINVAL; kvm_riscv_vcpu_fp_reset(vcpu); } else { - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + return -EBUSY; } return 0;
vcpu_set_reg_config() and vcpu_set_reg_isa_ext() is throwing an EOPNOTSUPP error when !vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once. In similar cases we're throwing an EBUSY error, like in mvendorid/marchid/mimpid set_reg(). EOPNOTSUPP has a conotation of finality. EBUSY is more adequate in this case since its a condition/error related to the vcpu lifecycle. Change these EOPNOTSUPP instances to EBUSY. Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> --- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)