From patchwork Thu Oct 5 14:38:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 13410196 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3F7E92707 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 15:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231187AbjJEO7j (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2023 10:59:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46476 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230443AbjJEO6L (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2023 10:58:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E32526A6D for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 07:38:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1696516731; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iOPMQ+O8zkPvCQldrm25BT2cWKNHJa32wCRyAB9nIAI=; b=UqtMwfAiIP5lHWHgSUU5lahTtGIXMIsDgF6P3rOcDbeWCTlbhsRSXJbaM762fmx/w25uT9 qeySf2j7EHMR+zKDMycyANPbmzONYlbbfSz94FJvnqUAJWLTNgKYhd3HLU0/lGOMfAKHFq /Fug5Xn0KVmCQilGtFRZuQOY8oEEb1Q= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-450-AwPrNZl6PJKwHq-xa8ZrlQ-1; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 10:38:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: AwPrNZl6PJKwHq-xa8ZrlQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464493C1E9D6; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 14:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.168]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1142A40C6EA8; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 14:38:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: selftests: x86: Use TAP interface in the sync_regs test Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:38:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20231005143839.365297-5-thuth@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20231005143839.365297-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20231005143839.365297-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org The sync_regs test currently does not have any output (unless one of the TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user whether a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or not. Let's make this a little bit more user-friendly and include some TAP output via the kselftest_harness.h / kvm_test_harness.h interface. To be able to use the interface, we have to break up the huge main() function here in more fine grained parts - then we can use the new KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST() macro to define the individual tests. Since these are run with a separate VM now, we have also to make sure to create the expected state at the beginning of each test, so some parts grow a little bit - which should be OK considering that the individual tests are more self-contained now. Suggested-by: David Matlack Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 110 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c index 1cd19dfa0046c..c857244762bb2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include +#include "kvm_test_harness.h" #include "test_util.h" #include "kvm_util.h" #include "processor.h" @@ -41,6 +42,8 @@ void guest_code(void) : "rax", "rbx"); } +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST_SUITE(sync_regs_test, guest_code); + static void compare_regs(struct kvm_regs *left, struct kvm_regs *right) { #define REG_COMPARE(reg) \ @@ -152,18 +155,15 @@ static noinline void *race_sregs_cr4(void *arg) return NULL; } -static void race_sync_regs(void *racer) +static void race_sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *racer) { const time_t TIMEOUT = 2; /* seconds, roughly */ struct kvm_x86_state *state; struct kvm_translation tr; - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; struct kvm_run *run; - struct kvm_vm *vm; pthread_t thread; time_t t; - vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); run = vcpu->run; run->kvm_valid_regs = KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS; @@ -205,26 +205,12 @@ static void race_sync_regs(void *racer) TEST_ASSERT_EQ(pthread_join(thread, NULL), 0); kvm_x86_state_cleanup(state); - kvm_vm_free(vm); } -int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, read_invalid) { - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; - struct kvm_vm *vm; - struct kvm_run *run; - struct kvm_regs regs; - struct kvm_sregs sregs; - struct kvm_vcpu_events events; - int rv, cap; - - cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS); - TEST_REQUIRE((cap & TEST_SYNC_FIELDS) == TEST_SYNC_FIELDS); - TEST_REQUIRE(!(cap & INVALID_SYNC_FIELD)); - - vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); - - run = vcpu->run; + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; + int rv; /* Request reading invalid register set from VCPU. */ run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD; @@ -240,6 +226,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n", rv); run->kvm_valid_regs = 0; +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, set_invalid) +{ + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; + int rv; /* Request setting invalid register set into VCPU. */ run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD; @@ -255,6 +247,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n", rv); run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, req_and_verify_all_valid) +{ + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; + struct kvm_vcpu_events events; + struct kvm_sregs sregs; + struct kvm_regs regs; /* Request and verify all valid register sets. */ /* TODO: BUILD TIME CHECK: TEST_ASSERT(KVM_SYNC_X86_NUM_FIELDS != 3); */ @@ -270,6 +270,19 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) vcpu_events_get(vcpu, &events); compare_vcpu_events(&events, &run->s.regs.events); +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, set_and_verify_various) +{ + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; + struct kvm_vcpu_events events; + struct kvm_sregs sregs; + struct kvm_regs regs; + + /* Run once to get register set */ + run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; + vcpu_run(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); /* Set and verify various register values. */ run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBAD1DEA; @@ -295,6 +308,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) vcpu_events_get(vcpu, &events); compare_vcpu_events(&events, &run->s.regs.events); +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, clear_kvm_dirty_regs_bits) +{ + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; /* Clear kvm_dirty_regs bits, verify new s.regs values are * overwritten with existing guest values. @@ -307,6 +325,17 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx != 0xDEADBEEF, "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.", run->s.regs.regs.rbx); +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, clear_kvm_valid_and_dirty_regs) +{ + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; + struct kvm_regs regs; + + /* Run once to get register set */ + run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; + vcpu_run(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); /* Clear kvm_valid_regs bits and kvm_dirty_bits. * Verify s.regs values are not overwritten with existing guest values @@ -327,6 +356,17 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) TEST_ASSERT(regs.rbx == 0xBAC0 + 1, "rbx guest value incorrect 0x%llx.", regs.rbx); +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, clear_kvm_valid_regs_bits) +{ + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run; + struct kvm_regs regs; + + /* Run once to get register set */ + run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; + vcpu_run(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); /* Clear kvm_valid_regs bits. Verify s.regs values are not overwritten * with existing guest values but that guest values are overwritten @@ -344,12 +384,30 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) TEST_ASSERT(regs.rbx == 0xBBBB + 1, "rbx guest value incorrect 0x%llx.", regs.rbx); +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, race_cr4) +{ + race_sync_regs(vcpu, race_sregs_cr4); +} + +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, race_exc) +{ + race_sync_regs(vcpu, race_events_exc); +} - kvm_vm_free(vm); +KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST(sync_regs_test, race_inj_pen) +{ + race_sync_regs(vcpu, race_events_inj_pen); +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + int cap; - race_sync_regs(race_sregs_cr4); - race_sync_regs(race_events_exc); - race_sync_regs(race_events_inj_pen); + cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS); + TEST_REQUIRE((cap & TEST_SYNC_FIELDS) == TEST_SYNC_FIELDS); + TEST_REQUIRE(!(cap & INVALID_SYNC_FIELD)); - return 0; + return test_harness_run(argc, argv); }