From patchwork Fri Nov 3 09:29:30 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nico Boehr X-Patchwork-Id: 13444423 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6865168BD for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="ro3k5TS8" Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A1B1AD; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3A39Oeln013081; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:30:08 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Vtx3jimJJQcEYxtJsiGxZSAsCGrbB0/Nlzx0qU+lOS8=; b=ro3k5TS8pfdUjE31vyqsjFHI4+rJd+F15JKemuaAQdOqKPcMyWv92jYtDzHe2X9lzOYh 6gc+0iH+MnreYk6A3BNanT2XbYLbx6ZcDuW/qQjzVVrSY2r0yFHgaXZ4SGUOni9aNHA1 M8fRjzex4qiuDFCnqwXhDrThaO8ucWrosirhplsK0OZKIygn8zZ9iuF9XkyUV9iQEYqH vzDRSuiK9NPWlzU/R44TJRCriWtxxHSwmI2R7AlKpd05zGrAs/VcDw/nLDxR/FGjwzzY ehoUtt8QGEjxWZVp1dDXAZBIPjzrgjsSfEan6ARVGasy7HzLr0RuE+GitIuXD7aIf+/i ww== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u4x6wg43y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Nov 2023 09:29:59 +0000 Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3A39QDoq016894; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:29:58 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u4x6wg43f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Nov 2023 09:29:58 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3A398kqm011576; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:29:58 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u1e4mcssd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Nov 2023 09:29:57 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 3A39Tsgm20906718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:29:55 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98772004D; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:29:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F5E2004B; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:29:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from t35lp63.lnxne.boe (unknown [9.152.108.100]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:29:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Nico Boehr To: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/8] lib: s390x: introduce bitfield for PSW mask Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 10:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20231103092954.238491-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20231103092954.238491-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> References: <20231103092954.238491-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: lmIkTwB_Ms2C2dWgySY2oqCNeR5abIrX X-Proofpoint-GUID: rCBpVYRlH9J0qO6nppbNz3lhy9jFssco X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.987,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-11-03_09,2023-11-02_03,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=612 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2310240000 definitions=main-2311030078 Changing the PSW mask is currently little clumsy, since there is only the PSW_MASK_* defines. This makes it hard to change e.g. only the address space in the current PSW without a lot of bit fiddling. Introduce a bitfield for the PSW mask. This makes this kind of modifications much simpler and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank --- lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- s390x/selftest.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h index bb26e008cc68..f629b6d0a17f 100644 --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h @@ -37,9 +37,32 @@ struct stack_frame_int { }; struct psw { - uint64_t mask; + union { + uint64_t mask; + struct { + uint64_t reserved00:1; + uint64_t per:1; + uint64_t reserved02:3; + uint64_t dat:1; + uint64_t io:1; + uint64_t ext:1; + uint64_t key:4; + uint64_t reserved12:1; + uint64_t mchk:1; + uint64_t wait:1; + uint64_t pstate:1; + uint64_t as:2; + uint64_t cc:2; + uint64_t prg_mask:4; + uint64_t reserved24:7; + uint64_t ea:1; + uint64_t ba:1; + uint64_t reserved33:31; + }; + }; uint64_t addr; }; +_Static_assert(sizeof(struct psw) == 16, "PSW size"); #define PSW(m, a) ((struct psw){ .mask = (m), .addr = (uint64_t)(a) }) diff --git a/s390x/selftest.c b/s390x/selftest.c index 13fd36bc06f8..92ed4e5d35eb 100644 --- a/s390x/selftest.c +++ b/s390x/selftest.c @@ -74,6 +74,39 @@ static void test_malloc(void) report_prefix_pop(); } +static void test_psw_mask(void) +{ + uint64_t expected_key = 0xf; + struct psw test_psw = PSW(0, 0); + + report_prefix_push("PSW mask"); + test_psw.mask = PSW_MASK_DAT; + report(test_psw.dat, "DAT matches expected=0x%016lx actual=0x%016lx", PSW_MASK_DAT, test_psw.mask); + + test_psw.mask = PSW_MASK_IO; + report(test_psw.io, "IO matches expected=0x%016lx actual=0x%016lx", PSW_MASK_IO, test_psw.mask); + + test_psw.mask = PSW_MASK_EXT; + report(test_psw.ext, "EXT matches expected=0x%016lx actual=0x%016lx", PSW_MASK_EXT, test_psw.mask); + + test_psw.mask = expected_key << (63 - 11); + report(test_psw.key == expected_key, "PSW Key matches expected=0x%lx actual=0x%x", expected_key, test_psw.key); + + test_psw.mask = 1UL << (63 - 13); + report(test_psw.mchk, "MCHK matches"); + + test_psw.mask = PSW_MASK_WAIT; + report(test_psw.wait, "Wait matches expected=0x%016lx actual=0x%016lx", PSW_MASK_WAIT, test_psw.mask); + + test_psw.mask = PSW_MASK_PSTATE; + report(test_psw.pstate, "Pstate matches expected=0x%016lx actual=0x%016lx", PSW_MASK_PSTATE, test_psw.mask); + + test_psw.mask = PSW_MASK_64; + report(test_psw.ea && test_psw.ba, "BA/EA matches expected=0x%016lx actual=0x%016lx", PSW_MASK_64, test_psw.mask); + + report_prefix_pop(); +} + int main(int argc, char**argv) { report_prefix_push("selftest"); @@ -89,6 +122,7 @@ int main(int argc, char**argv) test_fp(); test_pgm_int(); test_malloc(); + test_psw_mask(); return report_summary(); }