From patchwork Thu Nov 23 06:37:43 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shaoqin Huang X-Patchwork-Id: 13465817 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="KNceUvI8" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111B1DD for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:38:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1700721493; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xTYiBJPe9Fg1+bMpuh7F3M50blyCTjXl60iLcdLlNpM=; b=KNceUvI8RV9X8INomp41PWSTs/AYeo5HAUe2ajMWSYoDOZTgkJi2aMJ5QVs458dy1o1/hM BMae5lVmlZknYHBfp7+QBr6I5bmo8aHvhsSz2HPLkFRgn8potOxK9neJMo234EOs/uA3SS TC/D5yQam5nlm/5ezNldlhRqNTpspwk= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-515-Jyr159kbPGyPImmCmavwUw-1; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:38:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Jyr159kbPGyPImmCmavwUw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1C3186E19B; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 06:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virt-mtcollins-01.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com (virt-mtcollins-01.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com [10.8.1.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6911C060AE; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 06:38:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Shaoqin Huang To: Oliver Upton , Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Make the [create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() can be reused Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:37:43 -0500 Message-Id: <20231123063750.2176250-2-shahuang@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20231123063750.2176250-1-shahuang@redhat.com> References: <20231123063750.2176250-1-shahuang@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 Move the [create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() into the lib/, which makes those function can be used by other tests. Install the handler is specific to the vpmu_counter_access test, so create a wrapper function for it, and only move the common part. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang Reviewed-by: Eric Auger --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 100 +++++------------- .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h | 16 +++ .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c | 64 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index a5963ab9215b..b60852c222ac 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/processor.c LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/spinlock.c LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/ucall.c LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/vgic.c +LIBKVM_aarch64 += lib/aarch64/vpmu.c LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c LIBKVM_s390x += lib/s390x/processor.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c index 5ea78986e665..17305408a334 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -25,13 +26,7 @@ /* The cycle counter bit position that's common among the PMU registers */ #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX 31 -struct vpmu_vm { - struct kvm_vm *vm; - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; - int gic_fd; -}; - -static struct vpmu_vm vpmu_vm; +static struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm; struct pmreg_sets { uint64_t set_reg_id; @@ -421,64 +416,6 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n) GUEST_DONE(); } -#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL -#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL - -/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */ -static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code) -{ - struct kvm_vcpu_init init; - uint8_t pmuver, ec; - uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23; - struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = { - .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, - .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ, - .addr = (uint64_t)&irq, - }; - struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = { - .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, - .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT, - }; - - /* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */ - memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm)); - - vpmu_vm.vm = vm_create(1); - vm_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vm); - for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) { - vm_install_sync_handler(vpmu_vm.vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec, - guest_sync_handler); - } - - /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */ - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); - init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); - vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code); - vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu); - vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64, - GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA); - __TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm.gic_fd >= 0, - "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping"); - - /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */ - vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu, - KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0); - pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), dfr0); - TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF && - pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP, - "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver); - - /* Initialize vPMU */ - vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr); - vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr); -} - -static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void) -{ - close(vpmu_vm.gic_fd); - kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm.vm); -} - static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n) { struct ucall uc; @@ -497,13 +434,24 @@ static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n) } } +static void create_vpmu_vm_with_handler(void *guest_code) +{ + uint8_t ec; + vpmu_vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code); + + for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) { + vm_install_sync_handler(vpmu_vm->vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec, + guest_sync_handler); + } +} + static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(uint64_t pmcr_n, bool expect_fail) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig; - create_vpmu_vm(guest_code); - vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu; + create_vpmu_vm_with_handler(guest_code); + vcpu = vpmu_vm->vcpu; vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig); pmcr = pmcr_orig; @@ -539,7 +487,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n); test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, false); - vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu; + vcpu = vpmu_vm->vcpu; /* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), &sp); @@ -550,7 +498,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved. */ - vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu); @@ -559,7 +507,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n); - destroy_vpmu_vm(); + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm); } static struct pmreg_sets validity_check_reg_sets[] = { @@ -580,7 +528,7 @@ static void run_pmregs_validity_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) uint64_t valid_counters_mask, max_counters_mask; test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, false); - vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu; + vcpu = vpmu_vm->vcpu; valid_counters_mask = get_counters_mask(pmcr_n); max_counters_mask = get_counters_mask(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS); @@ -621,7 +569,7 @@ static void run_pmregs_validity_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(clr_reg_id), reg_val); } - destroy_vpmu_vm(); + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm); } /* @@ -634,7 +582,7 @@ static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n); test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, true); - destroy_vpmu_vm(); + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm); } /* @@ -645,9 +593,9 @@ static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void) { uint64_t pmcr; - create_vpmu_vm(guest_code); - vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr); - destroy_vpmu_vm(); + create_vpmu_vm_with_handler(guest_code); + vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm->vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr); + destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm); return get_pmcr_n(pmcr); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0a56183644ee --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#include + +#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL +#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL + +struct vpmu_vm { + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + int gic_fd; +}; + +struct vpmu_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code); + +void destroy_vpmu_vm(struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b3de8fdc555e --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */ +struct vpmu_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu_init init; + uint8_t pmuver; + uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23; + struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = { + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, + .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ, + .addr = (uint64_t)&irq, + }; + struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = { + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, + .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT, + }; + struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm; + + vpmu_vm = calloc(1, sizeof(*vpmu_vm)); + TEST_ASSERT(vpmu_vm != NULL, "Insufficient Memory"); + memset(vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm)); + + vpmu_vm->vm = vm_create(1); + vm_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm->vm); + + /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */ + vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); + vpmu_vm->vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm->vm, 0, &init, guest_code); + vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm->vcpu); + vpmu_vm->gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm->vm, 1, 64, + GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA); + __TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm->gic_fd >= 0, + "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping"); + + /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */ + vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm->vcpu, + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0); + pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), dfr0); + TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF && + pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP, + "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver); + + /* Initialize vPMU */ + vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr); + vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr); + + return vpmu_vm; +} + +void destroy_vpmu_vm(struct vpmu_vm *vpmu_vm) +{ + close(vpmu_vm->gic_fd); + kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm->vm); + free(vpmu_vm); +}