diff mbox series

[v2,2/4] KVM: selftests: Fix benign %llx vs. %lx issues in guest asserts

Message ID 20231129224916.532431-3-seanjc@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: selftests: Annotate guest printfs as such | expand

Commit Message

Sean Christopherson Nov. 29, 2023, 10:49 p.m. UTC
Convert %llx to %lx as appropriate in guest asserts.  The guest printf
implementation treats them the same as KVM selftests are 64-bit only, but
strictly adhering to the correct format will allow annotating the
underlying helpers with __printf() without introducing new warnings in the
build.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c      | 6 +++---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c      | 2 +-
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c   | 2 +-
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c    | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c    | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c      | 8 ++++----
 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
index 6637a0845acf..03ec7efd19aa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
@@ -157,17 +157,17 @@  static void guest_code_move_memory_region(void)
 	 */
 	val = guest_spin_on_val(0);
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(val == 1 || val == MMIO_VAL,
-		       "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%llx'), got '%llx'", MMIO_VAL, val);
+		       "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%lx'), got '%lx'", MMIO_VAL, val);
 
 	/* Spin until the misaligning memory region move completes. */
 	val = guest_spin_on_val(MMIO_VAL);
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(val == 1 || val == 0,
-		       "Expected '0' or '1' (no MMIO), got '%llx'", val);
+		       "Expected '0' or '1' (no MMIO), got '%lx'", val);
 
 	/* Spin until the memory region starts to get re-aligned. */
 	val = guest_spin_on_val(0);
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(val == 1 || val == MMIO_VAL,
-		       "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%llx'), got '%llx'", MMIO_VAL, val);
+		       "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%lx'), got '%lx'", MMIO_VAL, val);
 
 	/* Spin until the re-aligning memory region move completes. */
 	val = guest_spin_on_val(MMIO_VAL);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c
index 9f28aa276c4e..4bb63b6ee4a0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@  static void guest_msr(struct msr_data *msr)
 
 	if (msr->write)
 		__GUEST_ASSERT(!vector,
-			       "WRMSR(0x%x) to '0x%llx', RDMSR read '0x%llx'",
+			       "WRMSR(0x%x) to '0x%lx', RDMSR read '0x%lx'",
 			       msr->idx, msr->write_val, msr_val);
 
 	/* Invariant TSC bit appears when TSC invariant control MSR is written to */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
index 4d6a37a5d896..65ad38b6be1f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@  do {												\
 												\
 	for (i = 0; i < size; i++)								\
 		__GUEST_ASSERT(mem[i] == pattern,						\
-			       "Guest expected 0x%x at offset %lu (gpa 0x%llx), got 0x%x",	\
+			       "Guest expected 0x%x at offset %lu (gpa 0x%lx), got 0x%x",	\
 			       pattern, i, gpa + i, mem[i]);					\
 } while (0)
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c
index 7ee44496cf97..0c7ce3d4e83a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@  static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm, uint64_t is_nmi, uint64_t i
 
 	run_guest(vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa);
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL,
-		       "Expected VMMCAL #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%llx, info2 = '0x%llx'",
+		       "Expected VMMCAL #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%lx, info2 = '0x%lx'",
 		       vmcb->control.exit_code,
 		       vmcb->control.exit_info_1, vmcb->control.exit_info_2);
 
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@  static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm, uint64_t is_nmi, uint64_t i
 
 	run_guest(vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa);
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_HLT,
-		       "Expected HLT #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%llx, info2 = '0x%llx'",
+		       "Expected HLT #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%lx, info2 = '0x%lx'",
 		       vmcb->control.exit_code,
 		       vmcb->control.exit_info_1, vmcb->control.exit_info_2);
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
index ebbcb0a3f743..2a8d4ac2f020 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@  static void guest_test_perf_capabilities_gp(uint64_t val)
 	uint8_t vector = wrmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val);
 
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(vector == GP_VECTOR,
-		       "Expected #GP for value '0x%llx', got vector '0x%x'",
+		       "Expected #GP for value '0x%lx', got vector '0x%x'",
 		       val, vector);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c
index 77d04a7bdadd..dc6217440db3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@  do {											\
 											\
 	__GUEST_ASSERT((__supported & (xfeatures)) != (xfeatures) ||			\
 		       __supported == ((xfeatures) | (dependencies)),			\
-		       "supported = 0x%llx, xfeatures = 0x%llx, dependencies = 0x%llx",	\
+		       "supported = 0x%lx, xfeatures = 0x%llx, dependencies = 0x%llx",	\
 		       __supported, (xfeatures), (dependencies));			\
 } while (0)
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@  do {									\
 	uint64_t __supported = (supported_xcr0) & (xfeatures);		\
 									\
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(!__supported || __supported == (xfeatures),	\
-		       "supported = 0x%llx, xfeatures = 0x%llx",	\
+		       "supported = 0x%lx, xfeatures = 0x%llx",		\
 		       __supported, (xfeatures));			\
 } while (0)
 
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@  static void guest_code(void)
 
 	vector = xsetbv_safe(0, supported_xcr0);
 	__GUEST_ASSERT(!vector,
-		       "Expected success on XSETBV(0x%llx), got vector '0x%x'",
+		       "Expected success on XSETBV(0x%lx), got vector '0x%x'",
 		       supported_xcr0, vector);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@  static void guest_code(void)
 
 		vector = xsetbv_safe(0, supported_xcr0 | BIT_ULL(i));
 		__GUEST_ASSERT(vector == GP_VECTOR,
-			       "Expected #GP on XSETBV(0x%llx), supported XCR0 = %llx, got vector '0x%x'",
+			       "Expected #GP on XSETBV(0x%llx), supported XCR0 = %lx, got vector '0x%x'",
 			       BIT_ULL(i), supported_xcr0, vector);
 	}