From patchwork Wed Nov 29 22:49:14 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sean Christopherson X-Patchwork-Id: 13473628 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="oFDeVasz" Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51F1131 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5d1ed4b268dso5550397b3.0 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:49:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1701298163; x=1701902963; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jt3afr9C/NIzRrhpIhGigrnj+umWBaK2U3Kv0056zgw=; b=oFDeVaszqKVpYECsszkTNp3hDCq4mOQ/hhLZwwKbGX/2IbL05++SIxSHozA+I1Zx0F JOasnrDzTVBYPGnoCxfQ+CcaHqrWnkxk2TlilZQF4LvxMZN8bI522kR8ma6nPg7gb5nQ vTCUu1knw80Zz/VdVbpkWeT69SC8elC1NqwsXvMQqw2aNbArNf8FrrxMi2y+8fEhOCyc jn+OVT3jIUi60yYeYvdWIZ0tyS/9/RnwSTDgmOAUMIeQ2uFFyTBGDe+GM7Hbx6boMtQ6 NC1CJrztFe5zsDq3gh7YBbLBJ9ecbWc4VOlfU+u63V0MbzljfYGxn1yBVB0vEI2V53sk K4fQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701298163; x=1701902963; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jt3afr9C/NIzRrhpIhGigrnj+umWBaK2U3Kv0056zgw=; b=PLiEWrDxv4aCkxv2+ULR7O0GlH8BtRgmyRAFa+QLUvF02fVyesyj/NXR9Jayu3pdpU njaid1pxGZZBe/vSPVu+lxQgYU77XgrKX2tJ1isMhASq2B6UEHxvA0OJYtJMJo0WqKVc jgJxg1BdOR/CTVqxvZ5/f8f8N+q519K8sAKr98W82RR0lStn9ComdNXBE8aJ/c+lgWdG E78421qYtznWjXDxmDiNu0rfBNZnQsYC8ZpsJ4hUe+i67BLLLgOkW1zicOJnfWrOCK1t xcAgzmPRASnD1n2CHhrOOMCsdM14SAVIxsj3GvKfOfstHwBwrjAuDX7s6/flIYYhso/D 5lgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyClxXiQBQGhx+ak+fQjXM3dhqprYzatwwHSAQwOPKnvFGLX1gc DmXR0JPRYC2HpVH5s4+PCxw8OfTeYBQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGulxVXRNgaFOL2lJyl25oFAVWs5bdYEbG4SzfwCCsdRMsJGWH3Ec6G/kWD9vUh4OgGxi+dx9bVB6k= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:b614:0:b0:5cc:3af6:291 with SMTP id u20-20020a81b614000000b005cc3af60291mr614082ywh.5.1701298163174; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:49:23 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:49:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20231129224916.532431-1-seanjc@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20231129224916.532431-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.rc1.413.gea7ed67945-goog Message-ID: <20231129224916.532431-3-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: selftests: Fix benign %llx vs. %lx issues in guest asserts From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky Convert %llx to %lx as appropriate in guest asserts. The guest printf implementation treats them the same as KVM selftests are 64-bit only, but strictly adhering to the correct format will allow annotating the underlying helpers with __printf() without introducing new warnings in the build. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 6 +++--- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c | 2 +- .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c | 2 +- .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c | 4 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c | 8 ++++---- 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c index 6637a0845acf..03ec7efd19aa 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c @@ -157,17 +157,17 @@ static void guest_code_move_memory_region(void) */ val = guest_spin_on_val(0); __GUEST_ASSERT(val == 1 || val == MMIO_VAL, - "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%llx'), got '%llx'", MMIO_VAL, val); + "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%lx'), got '%lx'", MMIO_VAL, val); /* Spin until the misaligning memory region move completes. */ val = guest_spin_on_val(MMIO_VAL); __GUEST_ASSERT(val == 1 || val == 0, - "Expected '0' or '1' (no MMIO), got '%llx'", val); + "Expected '0' or '1' (no MMIO), got '%lx'", val); /* Spin until the memory region starts to get re-aligned. */ val = guest_spin_on_val(0); __GUEST_ASSERT(val == 1 || val == MMIO_VAL, - "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%llx'), got '%llx'", MMIO_VAL, val); + "Expected '1' or MMIO ('%lx'), got '%lx'", MMIO_VAL, val); /* Spin until the re-aligning memory region move completes. */ val = guest_spin_on_val(MMIO_VAL); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c index 9f28aa276c4e..4bb63b6ee4a0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_features.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void guest_msr(struct msr_data *msr) if (msr->write) __GUEST_ASSERT(!vector, - "WRMSR(0x%x) to '0x%llx', RDMSR read '0x%llx'", + "WRMSR(0x%x) to '0x%lx', RDMSR read '0x%lx'", msr->idx, msr->write_val, msr_val); /* Invariant TSC bit appears when TSC invariant control MSR is written to */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c index 4d6a37a5d896..65ad38b6be1f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ do { \ \ for (i = 0; i < size; i++) \ __GUEST_ASSERT(mem[i] == pattern, \ - "Guest expected 0x%x at offset %lu (gpa 0x%llx), got 0x%x", \ + "Guest expected 0x%x at offset %lu (gpa 0x%lx), got 0x%x", \ pattern, i, gpa + i, mem[i]); \ } while (0) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c index 7ee44496cf97..0c7ce3d4e83a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm, uint64_t is_nmi, uint64_t i run_guest(vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa); __GUEST_ASSERT(vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL, - "Expected VMMCAL #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%llx, info2 = '0x%llx'", + "Expected VMMCAL #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%lx, info2 = '0x%lx'", vmcb->control.exit_code, vmcb->control.exit_info_1, vmcb->control.exit_info_2); @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct svm_test_data *svm, uint64_t is_nmi, uint64_t i run_guest(vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa); __GUEST_ASSERT(vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_HLT, - "Expected HLT #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%llx, info2 = '0x%llx'", + "Expected HLT #VMEXIT, got '0x%x', info1 = '0x%lx, info2 = '0x%lx'", vmcb->control.exit_code, vmcb->control.exit_info_1, vmcb->control.exit_info_2); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c index ebbcb0a3f743..2a8d4ac2f020 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void guest_test_perf_capabilities_gp(uint64_t val) uint8_t vector = wrmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, val); __GUEST_ASSERT(vector == GP_VECTOR, - "Expected #GP for value '0x%llx', got vector '0x%x'", + "Expected #GP for value '0x%lx', got vector '0x%x'", val, vector); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c index 77d04a7bdadd..dc6217440db3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ do { \ \ __GUEST_ASSERT((__supported & (xfeatures)) != (xfeatures) || \ __supported == ((xfeatures) | (dependencies)), \ - "supported = 0x%llx, xfeatures = 0x%llx, dependencies = 0x%llx", \ + "supported = 0x%lx, xfeatures = 0x%llx, dependencies = 0x%llx", \ __supported, (xfeatures), (dependencies)); \ } while (0) @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ do { \ uint64_t __supported = (supported_xcr0) & (xfeatures); \ \ __GUEST_ASSERT(!__supported || __supported == (xfeatures), \ - "supported = 0x%llx, xfeatures = 0x%llx", \ + "supported = 0x%lx, xfeatures = 0x%llx", \ __supported, (xfeatures)); \ } while (0) @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void guest_code(void) vector = xsetbv_safe(0, supported_xcr0); __GUEST_ASSERT(!vector, - "Expected success on XSETBV(0x%llx), got vector '0x%x'", + "Expected success on XSETBV(0x%lx), got vector '0x%x'", supported_xcr0, vector); for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) { @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void guest_code(void) vector = xsetbv_safe(0, supported_xcr0 | BIT_ULL(i)); __GUEST_ASSERT(vector == GP_VECTOR, - "Expected #GP on XSETBV(0x%llx), supported XCR0 = %llx, got vector '0x%x'", + "Expected #GP on XSETBV(0x%llx), supported XCR0 = %lx, got vector '0x%x'", BIT_ULL(i), supported_xcr0, vector); }