Message ID | 20240207204652.22954-4-ankita@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory | expand |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:16:51AM +0530, ankita@nvidia.com wrote: > @@ -1557,10 +1559,18 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, > if (exec_fault) > prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X; > > - if (device) > - prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE; > - else if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC)) > + if (device) { > + /* > + * To provide VM with the ability to get device IO memory > + * with NormalNC property, map device MMIO as NormalNC in S2. > + */ nit: the comment doesn't provide anything of value, the logic is rather straightforward here. > + if (vfio_allow_wc) > + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC; > + else > + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE; > + } else if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC)) { > prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X; > + } > > /* > * Under the premise of getting a FSC_PERM fault, we just need to relax > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:16:51AM +0530, ankita@nvidia.com wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c > index d14504821b79..e1e6847a793b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c > @@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, > int ret = 0; > bool write_fault, writable, force_pte = false; > bool exec_fault, mte_allowed; > - bool device = false; > + bool device = false, vfio_allow_wc = false; > unsigned long mmu_seq; > struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; > struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache; > @@ -1472,6 +1472,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, > gfn = fault_ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT; > mte_allowed = kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma); > > + vfio_allow_wc = (vma->vm_flags & VM_VFIO_ALLOW_WC); Nitpick: no need for brackets, '=' has a pretty low precedence. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> + /* >> + * To provide VM with the ability to get device IO memory >> + * with NormalNC property, map device MMIO as NormalNC in S2. >> + */ > > nit: the comment doesn't provide anything of value, the logic is rather > straightforward here. Sure, will remove it. >> >> + vfio_allow_wc = (vma->vm_flags & VM_VFIO_ALLOW_WC); > > Nitpick: no need for brackets, '=' has a pretty low precedence. > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Will change it. Thanks for the review.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c index d14504821b79..e1e6847a793b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c @@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, int ret = 0; bool write_fault, writable, force_pte = false; bool exec_fault, mte_allowed; - bool device = false; + bool device = false, vfio_allow_wc = false; unsigned long mmu_seq; struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache; @@ -1472,6 +1472,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, gfn = fault_ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT; mte_allowed = kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma); + vfio_allow_wc = (vma->vm_flags & VM_VFIO_ALLOW_WC); + /* Don't use the VMA after the unlock -- it may have vanished */ vma = NULL; @@ -1557,10 +1559,18 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa, if (exec_fault) prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X; - if (device) - prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE; - else if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC)) + if (device) { + /* + * To provide VM with the ability to get device IO memory + * with NormalNC property, map device MMIO as NormalNC in S2. + */ + if (vfio_allow_wc) + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC; + else + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE; + } else if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC)) { prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X; + } /* * Under the premise of getting a FSC_PERM fault, we just need to relax