| Message ID | 20240212210932.3095265-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | KVM: selftests: Print timer ctl register in ISTATUS assertion | expand |
On 2024/2/13 05:09, Oliver Upton wrote: > Zenghui noted that the test assertion for the ISTATUS bit is printing > the current timer value instead of the control register in the case of > failure. While the assertion is sound, printing CNT isn't informative. > > Change things around to actually print the CTL register value instead. > > Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/3188e6f1-f150-f7d0-6c2b-5b7608b0b012@huawei.com/ > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <zenghui.yu@linux.dev>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:09:33 +0000, Oliver Upton wrote: > Zenghui noted that the test assertion for the ISTATUS bit is printing > the current timer value instead of the control register in the case of > failure. While the assertion is sound, printing CNT isn't informative. > > Change things around to actually print the CTL register value instead. > > > [...] Applied to kvmarm/next, thanks! [1/1] KVM: selftests: Print timer ctl register in ISTATUS assertion https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/8cdc71fbf655 -- Best, Oliver
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c index d5e8f365aa01..ab4b604d8ec0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void guest_validate_irq(unsigned int intid, __GUEST_ASSERT(xcnt >= cval, "xcnt = 0x%lx, cval = 0x%lx, xcnt_diff_us = 0x%lx", xcnt, cval, xcnt_diff_us); - __GUEST_ASSERT(xctl & CTL_ISTATUS, "xcnt = 0x%lx", xcnt); + __GUEST_ASSERT(xctl & CTL_ISTATUS, "xctl = 0x%lx", xctl); WRITE_ONCE(shared_data->nr_iter, shared_data->nr_iter + 1); }
Zenghui noted that the test assertion for the ISTATUS bit is printing the current timer value instead of the control register in the case of failure. While the assertion is sound, printing CNT isn't informative. Change things around to actually print the CTL register value instead. Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/3188e6f1-f150-f7d0-6c2b-5b7608b0b012@huawei.com/ Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> --- Applies to kvmarm/next. tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) base-commit: 680f749c272378a796388a3244bab53b5a952d67