From patchwork Wed Feb 14 10:15:55 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: WANG Xuerui X-Patchwork-Id: 13556250 Received: from mailbox.box.xen0n.name (mail.xen0n.name [115.28.160.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69EF417543; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.28.160.31 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707906250; cv=none; b=SoXmaCXK9rQpVW3t6Vb8EMC7SrdbRiGIZJaViMjwUlghGAeQHSOSbryXgyNRqfjycHiDNKrwdFLqK1+HkQ6cFbKa9KOHbSyku04R+OeRzCj3u7jMAshBKGUxWW4wkNkxriWGpqcwDjk4rUoMSq1Spr8GfXZf08Ed7alNQ4GJMaA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707906250; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VP6OWLTFU7Iwj95xAdgUR/i01Q0SJTbE9ZgKz6xmu84=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=EPAOii1fmPeuRZOpE7A6+TNcPf4Bc7EZ1AX9sxvdom8ChFT5PDvD4VGJcEbtbDpYjGAEuMAfww71faeODfCDVpLJf8A7aIEzrxq6t7jNfGnodiXBEGEKkFUWUyFBqGo0BaZDohAYDlGV1gHeKplxYa7RYz/6U3DAyldga5oiSZ8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen0n.name; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen0n.name; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=xen0n.name header.i=@xen0n.name header.b=xPELIX1z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.28.160.31 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen0n.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen0n.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=xen0n.name header.i=@xen0n.name header.b="xPELIX1z" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xen0n.name; s=mail; t=1707905767; bh=VP6OWLTFU7Iwj95xAdgUR/i01Q0SJTbE9ZgKz6xmu84=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xPELIX1zkthuNl7p7i0jC+9O9gRLMpQR6i86bz0hw432410swsodTqRxYGqmArAK6 ooPVVN57ifBG3uEKJHR6S+7CSg8sgzPpIgku7G16GDft5x55pLkzQ5NtxPHNx+85dB sp1BmohNFFBTlvOgjn6QhkdTa/VuOM3Scq3/9Vos= Received: from ld50.lan (unknown [IPv6:240e:388:8d00:6500:5531:eef6:1274:cebe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailbox.box.xen0n.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB9B5601C2; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:16:07 +0800 (CST) From: WANG Xuerui To: Paolo Bonzini , Huacai Chen Cc: Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui Subject: [PATCH for-6.8 3/5] KVM: LoongArch: Rename _kvm_get_cpucfg to _kvm_get_cpucfg_mask Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:15:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20240214101557.2900512-4-kernel@xen0n.name> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240214101557.2900512-1-kernel@xen0n.name> References: <20240214101557.2900512-1-kernel@xen0n.name> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: WANG Xuerui The function is not actually a getter of guest CPUCFG, but rather validation of the input CPUCFG ID plus information about the supported bit flags of that CPUCFG leaf. So rename it to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui --- arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c index cc2332b056ba..e973500611b4 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int _kvm_setcsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id, u64 val) return ret; } -static int _kvm_get_cpucfg(int id, u64 *v) +static int _kvm_get_cpucfg_mask(int id, u64 *v) { switch (id) { case 2: @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int kvm_check_cpucfg(int id, u64 val) u64 mask; int ret; - ret = _kvm_get_cpucfg(id, &mask); + ret = _kvm_get_cpucfg_mask(id, &mask); if (ret) return ret; @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int kvm_loongarch_get_cpucfg_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t val; uint64_t __user *uaddr = (uint64_t __user *)attr->addr; - ret = _kvm_get_cpucfg(attr->attr, &val); + ret = _kvm_get_cpucfg_mask(attr->attr, &val); if (ret) return ret;