From patchwork Fri Feb 16 18:41:44 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Oliver Upton X-Patchwork-Id: 13560457 Received: from out-181.mta0.migadu.com (out-181.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 297441353EA for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.181 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708108931; cv=none; b=oKrRaoqTYHUiLlylTobnnBMVNXyJE2rcNjnJQGmtHheXDp8QjmMVoFoIK0UD2uD8yzpupQOILcRhNQKoGq6/Lyzv2g0GgkCxRb585XQpn2XFuezFASnw6PjBOagBVfNlTHIeGO0QwsKvVodXMpTOEk4CFYVQjpWfvlfTkDAZ49w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708108931; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dH0k6IN0MHlaNID2kd6SHBELB8QrefZu66kvwU5n4cs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=XbP+XNs35cAGNolGVSj+M1Ll0/EGFPZdRHP9s8lMe4hb2VdSx/T2oCmKoxEfBdsL4ijRHqLcW9pF0BCXeBH0fwXqg2/oMdapiteVJo9uhf2BJeO4+4C+qaO3EbVZR60D/vKdhczJCuH7WQnADzjjIpznFHQyaZvHUYSF/uWI1/M= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=H/JVGd4/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="H/JVGd4/" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1708108927; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qQ663bMVQErfiC1nnRDiwhyxZXGKefti52HAGa4Tyg4=; b=H/JVGd4/7Qq9RFnGveFyggh0J3Hiz/SYlGE4oLCu0pRw3RL+NYbIT9UL+2eGUevSFydFmQ PChqNQZt1fy48ANP9BQdYkMZZY2UaaMHjgyxXAX09BXBszi6N6AdOjz0n4yFyxssgBGdGf +wOUy0mYdWR1ebkABIDqrOxY2J1j9AU= From: Oliver Upton To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Upton Subject: [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: arm64: vgic: Store LPIs in an xarray Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:41:44 +0000 Message-ID: <20240216184153.2714504-2-oliver.upton@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: <20240216184153.2714504-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> References: <20240216184153.2714504-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Using a linked-list for LPIs is less than ideal as it of course requires iterative searches to find a particular entry. An xarray is a better data structure for this use case, as it provides faster searches and can still handle a potentially sparse range of INTID allocations. Start by storing LPIs in an xarray, punting usage of the xarray to a subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton --- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 3 +++ arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 1 + include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c index e949e1d0fd9f..411719053107 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_list_head); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_translation_cache); raw_spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + xa_init_flags(&dist->lpi_xa, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ); } /* CREATION */ @@ -366,6 +367,8 @@ static void kvm_vgic_dist_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) if (vgic_supports_direct_msis(kvm)) vgic_v4_teardown(kvm); + + xa_destroy(&dist->lpi_xa); } static void __kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c index e2764d0ffa9f..fb2d3c356984 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, if (!irq) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + ret = xa_reserve_irq(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); + if (ret) { + kfree(irq); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->lpi_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&irq->ap_list); raw_spin_lock_init(&irq->irq_lock); @@ -86,12 +92,22 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, goto out_unlock; } + ret = xa_err(xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0)); + if (ret) { + xa_release(&dist->lpi_xa, intid); + kfree(irq); + goto out_unlock; + } + list_add_tail(&irq->lpi_list, &dist->lpi_list_head); dist->lpi_list_count++; out_unlock: raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + if (ret) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + /* * We "cache" the configuration table entries in our struct vgic_irq's. * However we only have those structs for mapped IRQs, so we read in diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c index db2a95762b1b..c126014f8395 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ void __vgic_put_lpi_locked(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq) return; list_del(&irq->lpi_list); + xa_erase(&dist->lpi_xa, irq->intid); dist->lpi_list_count--; kfree(irq); diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h index 8cc38e836f54..795b35656b54 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ struct vgic_dist { /* Protects the lpi_list and the count value below. */ raw_spinlock_t lpi_list_lock; + struct xarray lpi_xa; struct list_head lpi_list_head; int lpi_list_count;