diff mbox series

[05/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Track shadow MMIO value on a per-VM basis

Message ID 20240412173532.3481264-6-pbonzini@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series KVM: MMU changes for confidential computing | expand

Commit Message

Paolo Bonzini April 12, 2024, 5:35 p.m. UTC 
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

TDX will use a different shadow PTE entry value for MMIO from VMX.  Add a
member to kvm_arch and track value for MMIO per-VM instead of a global
variable.  By using the per-VM EPT entry value for MMIO, the existing VMX
logic is kept working.  Introduce a separate setter function so that guest
TD can use a different value later.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Message-Id: <229a18434e5d83f45b1fcd7bf1544d79db1becb6.1705965635.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 7 ++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c         | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h         | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      | 6 +++---
 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 67dc108dd366..23f1b123830a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1313,6 +1313,8 @@  struct kvm_arch {
 	 */
 	spinlock_t mmu_unsync_pages_lock;
 
+	u64 shadow_mmio_value;
+
 	struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain;
 	bool iommu_noncoherent;
 #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index addd7f7f7606..edfc6d67692b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2462,7 +2462,7 @@  static int mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 				return kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, child,
 								invalid_list);
 		}
-	} else if (is_mmio_spte(pte)) {
+	} else if (is_mmio_spte(kvm, pte)) {
 		mmu_spte_clear_no_track(spte);
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -4144,7 +4144,7 @@  static int handle_mmio_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reserved))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (is_mmio_spte(spte)) {
+	if (is_mmio_spte(vcpu->kvm, spte)) {
 		gfn_t gfn = get_mmio_spte_gfn(spte);
 		unsigned int access = get_mmio_spte_access(spte);
 
@@ -4768,7 +4768,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_new_pgd);
 static bool sync_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, gfn_t gfn,
 			   unsigned int access)
 {
-	if (unlikely(is_mmio_spte(*sptep))) {
+	if (unlikely(is_mmio_spte(vcpu->kvm, *sptep))) {
 		if (gfn != get_mmio_spte_gfn(*sptep)) {
 			mmu_spte_clear_no_track(sptep);
 			return true;
@@ -6275,6 +6275,7 @@  static bool kvm_has_zapped_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
+	kvm->arch.shadow_mmio_value = shadow_mmio_value;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.possible_nx_huge_pages);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index d97c4725c0b7..3faa16f5777e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -74,10 +74,10 @@  u64 make_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn, unsigned int access)
 	u64 spte = generation_mmio_spte_mask(gen);
 	u64 gpa = gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!shadow_mmio_value);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu->kvm->arch.shadow_mmio_value);
 
 	access &= shadow_mmio_access_mask;
-	spte |= shadow_mmio_value | access;
+	spte |= vcpu->kvm->arch.shadow_mmio_value | access;
 	spte |= gpa | shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
 	spte |= (gpa & shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask)
 		<< SHADOW_NONPRESENT_OR_RSVD_MASK_LEN;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 465fa283326b..b7ee32061cf6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -265,9 +265,9 @@  static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *root_to_sp(hpa_t root)
 	return spte_to_child_sp(root);
 }
 
-static inline bool is_mmio_spte(u64 spte)
+static inline bool is_mmio_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 spte)
 {
-	return (spte & shadow_mmio_mask) == shadow_mmio_value &&
+	return (spte & shadow_mmio_mask) == kvm->arch.shadow_mmio_value &&
 	       likely(enable_mmio_caching);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f5401967897a..5fd618abc243 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -495,8 +495,8 @@  static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
 		 * impact the guest since both the former and current SPTEs
 		 * are nonpresent.
 		 */
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_mmio_spte(old_spte) &&
-				 !is_mmio_spte(new_spte) &&
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_mmio_spte(kvm, old_spte) &&
+				 !is_mmio_spte(kvm, new_spte) &&
 				 !is_removed_spte(new_spte)))
 			pr_err("Unexpected SPTE change! Nonpresent SPTEs\n"
 			       "should not be replaced with another,\n"
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@  static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	}
 
 	/* If a MMIO SPTE is installed, the MMIO will need to be emulated. */
-	if (unlikely(is_mmio_spte(new_spte))) {
+	if (unlikely(is_mmio_spte(vcpu->kvm, new_spte))) {
 		vcpu->stat.pf_mmio_spte_created++;
 		trace_mark_mmio_spte(rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), iter->gfn,
 				     new_spte);