@@ -6693,7 +6693,7 @@ static void shadow_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm,
continue;
}
- spte = make_huge_page_split_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, index);
+ spte = make_small_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, index);
mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
__rmap_add(kvm, cache, slot, sptep, gfn, sp->role.access);
}
@@ -300,8 +300,8 @@ static u64 make_spte_nonexecutable(u64 spte)
* This is used during huge page splitting to build the SPTEs that make up the
* new page table.
*/
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
- union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index)
+u64 make_small_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index)
{
u64 child_spte = huge_spte;
@@ -501,8 +501,8 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
u64 old_spte, bool prefetch, bool can_unsync,
bool host_writable, u64 *new_spte);
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
- union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index);
+u64 make_small_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index);
u64 make_huge_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 small_spte, int level);
u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled);
u64 make_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn, unsigned int access);
@@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
* not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
*/
for (i = 0; i < SPTE_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++)
- sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, i);
+ sp->spt[i] = make_small_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, i);
/*
* Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level
Rename make_huge_page_split_spte() to make_small_spte(). This ensures that the usage of "small_spte" and "huge_spte" are consistent between make_huge_spte() and make_small_spte(). This should also reduce some confusion as make_huge_page_split_spte() almost reads like it will create a huge SPTE, when in fact it is creating a small SPTE to split the huge SPTE. No functional change intended. Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)