diff mbox series

[v13,06/13] x86/sev: Prevent GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR interception for Secure TSC enabled guests

Message ID 20241021055156.2342564-7-nikunj@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add Secure TSC support for SNP guests | expand

Commit Message

Nikunj A. Dadhania Oct. 21, 2024, 5:51 a.m. UTC
The hypervisor should not be intercepting GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR(0xcOO10134)
when Secure TSC is enabled. A #VC exception will be generated if the
GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR is being intercepted. If this should occur and SecureTSC
is enabled, terminate guest execution.

Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
 arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c         | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

Comments

Tom Lendacky Oct. 21, 2024, 2:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On 10/21/24 00:51, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> The hypervisor should not be intercepting GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR(0xcOO10134)
> when Secure TSC is enabled. A #VC exception will be generated if the
> GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR is being intercepted. If this should occur and SecureTSC
> is enabled, terminate guest execution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Just a minor comment/question below.

> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
>  arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c         | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 3ae84c3b8e6d..233be13cc21f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@
>  #define MSR_AMD_PERF_CTL		0xc0010062
>  #define MSR_AMD_PERF_STATUS		0xc0010063
>  #define MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE		0xc0010064
> +#define MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ	0xc0010134
>  #define MSR_AMD64_OSVW_ID_LENGTH	0xc0010140
>  #define MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS		0xc0010141
>  #define MSR_AMD_PPIN_CTL		0xc00102f0
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> index 2ad7773458c0..4e9b1cc1f26b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> @@ -1332,6 +1332,14 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_msr(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
>  		return ES_OK;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * GUEST_TSC_FREQ should not be intercepted when Secure TSC is
> +	 * enabled. Terminate the SNP guest when the interception is enabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (regs->cx == MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))

Should the cc_platform_has() check be changed into a check against
sev_status directly (similar to the DEBUG_SWAP support)? Just in case
this handler ends up getting used in early code where cc_platform_has()
can't be used.

Thanks,
Tom

> +		return ES_VMM_ERROR;
> +
> +
>  	ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
>  	if (exit_info_1) {
>  		ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, regs->ax);
Nikunj A. Dadhania Oct. 22, 2024, 4:20 a.m. UTC | #2
On 10/21/2024 7:38 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 10/21/24 00:51, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> The hypervisor should not be intercepting GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR(0xcOO10134)
>> when Secure TSC is enabled. A #VC exception will be generated if the
>> GUEST_TSC_FREQ MSR is being intercepted. If this should occur and SecureTSC
>> is enabled, terminate guest execution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> 
> Just a minor comment/question below.
> 
..
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
>> index 2ad7773458c0..4e9b1cc1f26b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
>> @@ -1332,6 +1332,14 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_msr(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
>>  		return ES_OK;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * GUEST_TSC_FREQ should not be intercepted when Secure TSC is
>> +	 * enabled. Terminate the SNP guest when the interception is enabled.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (regs->cx == MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
> 
> Should the cc_platform_has() check be changed into a check against
> sev_status directly (similar to the DEBUG_SWAP support)? Just in case
> this handler ends up getting used in early code where cc_platform_has()
> can't be used.

Sure, that makes sense. I will change it in my next version.

Regards
Nikunj
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index 3ae84c3b8e6d..233be13cc21f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ 
 #define MSR_AMD_PERF_CTL		0xc0010062
 #define MSR_AMD_PERF_STATUS		0xc0010063
 #define MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE		0xc0010064
+#define MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ	0xc0010134
 #define MSR_AMD64_OSVW_ID_LENGTH	0xc0010140
 #define MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS		0xc0010141
 #define MSR_AMD_PPIN_CTL		0xc00102f0
diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
index 2ad7773458c0..4e9b1cc1f26b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
@@ -1332,6 +1332,14 @@  static enum es_result vc_handle_msr(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
 		return ES_OK;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * GUEST_TSC_FREQ should not be intercepted when Secure TSC is
+	 * enabled. Terminate the SNP guest when the interception is enabled.
+	 */
+	if (regs->cx == MSR_AMD64_GUEST_TSC_FREQ && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
+		return ES_VMM_ERROR;
+
+
 	ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
 	if (exit_info_1) {
 		ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, regs->ax);