[04/67] KVM: x86: Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting IRQ bypass producer

Commit Message

Sean Christopherson April 4, 2025, 7:38 p.m. UTC

Take irqfds.lock when adding/deleting an IRQ bypass producer to ensure
irqfd->producer isn't modified while kvm_irq_routing_update() is running.
The only lock held when a producer is added/removed is irqbypass's mutex.

Fixes: 872768800652 ("KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER")
Cc: [e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index f94f1217a087..dcc173852dc5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -13569,15 +13569,22 @@  int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 {
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+	struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
 	int ret;
 
-	irqfd->producer = prod;
 	kvm_arch_start_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+	irqfd->producer = prod;
+
 	ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm,
 					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1);
 	if (ret)
 		kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
 
+	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -13587,9 +13594,9 @@  void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	int ret;
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
 		container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
+	struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
 
 	WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod);
-	irqfd->producer = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * When producer of consumer is unregistered, we change back to
@@ -13597,12 +13604,18 @@  void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	 * when the irq is masked/disabled or the consumer side (KVM
 	 * int this case doesn't want to receive the interrupts.
 	*/
+	spin_lock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+	irqfd->producer = NULL;
+
 	ret = kvm_x86_call(pi_update_irte)(irqfd->kvm,
 					   prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "irq bypass consumer (token %p) unregistration"
 		       " fails: %d\n", irqfd->consumer.token, ret);
 
+	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
+
+
 	kvm_arch_end_assignment(irqfd->kvm);
 }