@@ -309,6 +309,135 @@ TRACE_EVENT(
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long hva),
+
+ TP_ARGS(hva),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, hva)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->hva = hva;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("hva %lx", __entry->hva)
+);
+
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mmu_notifier_young_class,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long hva, int young),
+
+ TP_ARGS(hva, young),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, hva)
+ __field(int, young)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->hva = hva;
+ __entry->young = young;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("hva %lx young %x", __entry->hva, __entry->young)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mmu_notifier_young_class, kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long hva, int young),
+
+ TP_ARGS(hva, young)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mmu_notifier_young_class, kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long hva, int young),
+
+ TP_ARGS(hva, young)
+);
+
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mmu_notifier_range_class,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long start, unsigned long end),
+
+ TP_ARGS(start, end),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, start)
+ __field(unsigned long, end)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->start = start;
+ __entry->end = end;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("start %lx end %lx", __entry->start, __entry->end)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mmu_notifier_range_class, kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long start, unsigned long end),
+
+ TP_ARGS(start, end)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(mmu_notifier_range_class, kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long start, unsigned long end),
+
+ TP_ARGS(start, end)
+);
+
+#define pte_bit(func, bit) \
+ (pte_##func(__pte(__entry->pteval)) ? bit : '-')
+
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte,
+
+ TP_PROTO(unsigned long hva, pte_t pte),
+
+ TP_ARGS(hva, pte),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned long, hva)
+ __field(unsigned long long, pteval)
+ __field(pfn_t, pfn)
+ __field(bool, writable)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->hva = hva;
+ __entry->pteval = (long long)pte_val(pte);
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("hva %lx pte %llx pfn %lx bits %c%c%c%c", __entry->hva,
+ __entry->pteval, pte_pfn(__pte(__entry->pteval)),
+ pte_bit(present, 'p'), pte_bit(write, 'w'),
+ pte_bit(dirty, 'd'), pte_bit(young, 'a'))
+);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_mmu_notifier_release,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct kvm *kvm),
+
+ TP_ARGS(kvm),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(struct kvm *, kvm)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->kvm = kvm;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("kvm %p", __entry->kvm)
+);
+#endif
+
#endif /* _TRACE_KVM_MAIN_H */
/* This part must be outside protection */
@@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(address);
+
kvm->mmu_notifier_seq++;
need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva(kvm, address) | kvm->tlbs_dirty;
/* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
@@ -307,6 +309,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(address, pte);
+
kvm->mmu_notifier_seq++;
kvm_set_spte_hva(kvm, address, pte);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -323,6 +328,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(start, end);
+
/*
* The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
* spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
@@ -347,6 +355,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(start, end);
+
/*
* This sequence increase will notify the kvm page fault that
* the page that is going to be mapped in the spte could have
@@ -379,6 +390,8 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
if (young)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(address, young);
+
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
@@ -395,6 +408,9 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
young = kvm_test_age_hva(kvm, address);
+
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(address, young);
+
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
@@ -408,6 +424,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
int idx;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+ trace_kvm_mmu_notifier_release(kvm);
+
kvm_arch_flush_shadow(kvm);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
}
mmu_notifier is the interface to broadcast the mm events to KVM, the tracepoints introduced in this patch can trace all these events, it is very helpful for us to notice and fix the bug caused by mm Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/trace/events/kvm.h | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19 +++++++ 2 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)