From patchwork Thu Oct 11 16:14:41 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 10636967 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4431C933 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361202B6D7 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 24AF12BACC; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEE92B6D7 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728669AbeJKXml (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:42:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39492 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726700AbeJKXml (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:42:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5B43082A26; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shalem.localdomain.com (unknown [10.36.118.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1B071C5E; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Thierry Reding , Andy Shevchenko , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown Cc: Hans de Goede , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] pwm: lpss: Check PWM powerstate after resume on Cherry Trail devices Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:14:41 +0200 Message-Id: <20181011161444.328-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Hi All, As requested here is a new version of this series adding a patch exporting acpi_device_get_power() and using that. This means that the PWM changes now rely on an ACPI patch. I've 3 other LPSS PWM changes in flight which all have already been acked or reviewed by Andy. One option would be to merge the entire series + the 3 patches through Rafael's PM tree. If we want to go that route I can send out a new series with all 6 patches together to Rafael. Another option would be to merge the single line ACPI change through the PWM tree. Rafael, Thierry how do you want to proceed with this? And if you prefer for the changes to go through the other tree, may we have your Acked-by for the patch(es) which would normally go in through your own tree ? Regards, Hans