mbox series

[v3,00/13] Software fwnode references

Message ID 20190412134122.82903-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Software fwnode references | expand

Message

Heikki Krogerus April 12, 2019, 1:41 p.m. UTC
Hi,

This is the third version of my proposal to add reference handling to
the software node code. In this version I renamed ACPI_NAME_SIZE to
ACPI_NAMESEG_SIZE in 6/13, and slit patch 9/13 in two separate patches
(9/13 and 10/13) as suggested by Andy. Patch 9/13 will now only move
the registration of max17047 out of probe, and 10/13 will introduce
the software nodes.

v2 commit message:

This is the second version of this series. In this version I'm
introducing a new helper device_find_child_by_name() as proposed
by Andy. Andy requested also another helper that could be used for
chaining the fwnodes, but I decided not to add that now. I would like
to still think about how we should handle exceptions like if there
already is a secondary node assigned for a node.

v1 commit message:

This series adds support for software fwnode reference handling. In
practice it means making fwnode_property_get_reference_args() function
usable in the drivers also with software nodes. I send the series
originally as RFC [1].

As the first user for the software node references, I'm converting
intel_cht_int33fe.c to use them as part of the series.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/15/457

thanks,

Heikki Krogerus (13):
  software node: Allow node creation without properties
  software node: Simplify software_node_release() function
  software node: Add support for references
  software node: Implement .get_reference_args fwnode operation
  driver core: Add helper device_find_child_by_name()
  ACPI / property: Don't limit named child node matching to data nodes
  device connection: Find connections also by checking the references
  usb: typec: Registering real device entries for the muxes
  platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Register max17047 in its own function
  platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Provide software nodes for the
    devices
  platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Provide fwnode for the USB connector
  platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Link with external dependencies using
    fwnodes
  platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Replacing the old connections with
    references

 drivers/acpi/property.c                  |  26 +-
 drivers/base/core.c                      |  31 +++
 drivers/base/devcon.c                    |  28 ++
 drivers/base/swnode.c                    | 180 +++++++++++-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 339 +++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/usb/typec/bus.h                  |  15 +
 drivers/usb/typec/class.c                |  17 +-
 drivers/usb/typec/mux.c                  | 221 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/usb/typec/mux/pi3usb30532.c      |  46 +--
 include/linux/device.h                   |   2 +
 include/linux/property.h                 |   8 +
 include/linux/usb/typec_mux.h            |  62 ++---
 12 files changed, 791 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-)

Comments

Rafael J. Wysocki April 17, 2019, 7:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:42 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the third version of my proposal to add reference handling to
> the software node code. In this version I renamed ACPI_NAME_SIZE to
> ACPI_NAMESEG_SIZE in 6/13, and slit patch 9/13 in two separate patches
> (9/13 and 10/13) as suggested by Andy. Patch 9/13 will now only move
> the registration of max17047 out of probe, and 10/13 will introduce
> the software nodes.
>
> v2 commit message:
>
> This is the second version of this series. In this version I'm
> introducing a new helper device_find_child_by_name() as proposed
> by Andy. Andy requested also another helper that could be used for
> chaining the fwnodes, but I decided not to add that now. I would like
> to still think about how we should handle exceptions like if there
> already is a secondary node assigned for a node.
>
> v1 commit message:
>
> This series adds support for software fwnode reference handling. In
> practice it means making fwnode_property_get_reference_args() function
> usable in the drivers also with software nodes. I send the series
> originally as RFC [1].
>
> As the first user for the software node references, I'm converting
> intel_cht_int33fe.c to use them as part of the series.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/15/457

I added this series to the bleeding-edge branch last night and it
triggered some warnings from various checkers and there was a breakage
report from Hans.  All of that needs to be fixed IMO, so I'm expecting
an update.

Thanks!
Heikki Krogerus April 17, 2019, 8:13 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:42 PM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the third version of my proposal to add reference handling to
> > the software node code. In this version I renamed ACPI_NAME_SIZE to
> > ACPI_NAMESEG_SIZE in 6/13, and slit patch 9/13 in two separate patches
> > (9/13 and 10/13) as suggested by Andy. Patch 9/13 will now only move
> > the registration of max17047 out of probe, and 10/13 will introduce
> > the software nodes.
> >
> > v2 commit message:
> >
> > This is the second version of this series. In this version I'm
> > introducing a new helper device_find_child_by_name() as proposed
> > by Andy. Andy requested also another helper that could be used for
> > chaining the fwnodes, but I decided not to add that now. I would like
> > to still think about how we should handle exceptions like if there
> > already is a secondary node assigned for a node.
> >
> > v1 commit message:
> >
> > This series adds support for software fwnode reference handling. In
> > practice it means making fwnode_property_get_reference_args() function
> > usable in the drivers also with software nodes. I send the series
> > originally as RFC [1].
> >
> > As the first user for the software node references, I'm converting
> > intel_cht_int33fe.c to use them as part of the series.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/15/457
> 
> I added this series to the bleeding-edge branch last night and it
> triggered some warnings from various checkers and there was a breakage
> report from Hans.  All of that needs to be fixed IMO, so I'm expecting
> an update.

I'm on it.

thanks,