diff mbox

[v2,2/3] acpi,memory-hotplug: introduce a mutex lock to protect the list in acpi_memory_device

Message ID 1350641040-19434-3-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Wen Congyang Oct. 19, 2012, 10:03 a.m. UTC 
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>

The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

This 2 events may happen at the same time, so we may touch
acpi_memory_device.res_list at the same time. This patch
introduce a lock to protect this list.

CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Motohiro KOSAKI Oct. 19, 2012, 7:20 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:03 AM,  <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
> 1. send eject request by SCI
> 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
>
> This 2 events may happen at the same time, so we may touch
> acpi_memory_device.res_list at the same time. This patch
> introduce a lock to protect this list.
>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> index 1e90e8f..8ff2976 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ struct acpi_memory_info {
>  struct acpi_memory_device {
>         struct acpi_device * device;
>         unsigned int state;     /* State of the memory device */
> -       struct list_head res_list;
> +       struct mutex lock;
> +       struct list_head res_list;      /* protected by lock */
>  };

Please avoid grep unfriendly name. "lock" is too common. res_list_lock
or list_lock
are better IMHO.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index 1e90e8f..8ff2976 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@  struct acpi_memory_info {
 struct acpi_memory_device {
 	struct acpi_device * device;
 	unsigned int state;	/* State of the memory device */
-	struct list_head res_list;
+	struct mutex lock;
+	struct list_head res_list;	/* protected by lock */
 };
 
 static int acpi_hotmem_initialized;
@@ -101,19 +102,23 @@  acpi_memory_get_resource(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context)
 	    (address64.resource_type != ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE))
 		return AE_OK;
 
+	mutex_lock(&mem_device->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(info, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
 		/* Can we combine the resource range information? */
 		if ((info->caching == address64.info.mem.caching) &&
 		    (info->write_protect == address64.info.mem.write_protect) &&
 		    (info->start_addr + info->length == address64.minimum)) {
 			info->length += address64.address_length;
+			mutex_unlock(&mem_device->lock);
 			return AE_OK;
 		}
 	}
 
 	new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_memory_info), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!new)
+	if (!new) {
+		mutex_unlock(&mem_device->lock);
 		return AE_ERROR;
+	}
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
 	new->caching = address64.info.mem.caching;
@@ -121,6 +126,7 @@  acpi_memory_get_resource(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context)
 	new->start_addr = address64.minimum;
 	new->length = address64.address_length;
 	list_add_tail(&new->list, &mem_device->res_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&mem_device->lock);
 
 	return AE_OK;
 }
@@ -138,9 +144,11 @@  acpi_memory_get_device_resources(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	status = acpi_walk_resources(mem_device->device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
 				     acpi_memory_get_resource, mem_device);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		mutex_lock(&mem_device->lock);
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list)
 			kfree(info);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem_device->res_list);
+		mutex_unlock(&mem_device->lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -236,6 +244,7 @@  static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	 * We don't have memory-hot-add rollback function,now.
 	 * (i.e. memory-hot-remove function)
 	 */
+	mutex_lock(&mem_device->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(info, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
 		if (info->enabled) { /* just sanity check...*/
 			num_enabled++;
@@ -256,6 +265,7 @@  static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 		info->enabled = 1;
 		num_enabled++;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&mem_device->lock);
 	if (!num_enabled) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "add_memory failed\n");
 		mem_device->state = MEMORY_INVALID_STATE;
@@ -316,6 +326,7 @@  static int acpi_memory_disable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 	 * Ask the VM to offline this memory range.
 	 * Note: Assume that this function returns zero on success
 	 */
+	mutex_lock(&mem_device->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
 		if (info->enabled) {
 			result = remove_memory(info->start_addr, info->length);
@@ -324,6 +335,7 @@  static int acpi_memory_disable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
 		}
 		kfree(info);
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&mem_device->lock);
 
 	/* Power-off and eject the device */
 	result = acpi_memory_powerdown_device(mem_device);
@@ -438,6 +450,7 @@  static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 	mem_device->device = device;
 	sprintf(acpi_device_name(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_NAME);
 	sprintf(acpi_device_class(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_CLASS);
+	mutex_init(&mem_device->lock);
 	device->driver_data = mem_device;
 
 	/* Get the range from the _CRS */