diff mbox

[RFC,v3,2/3] acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation

Message ID 1353693037-21704-3-git-send-email-vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Vasilis Liaskovitis Nov. 23, 2012, 5:50 p.m. UTC
Offlining and removal of memory is now done in the prepare_remove callback,
not in the remove callback.

The prepare_remove callback will be called when trying to remove a memory device
with the following ways:

1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

Note that unbinding the acpi driver from a memory device with:
echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind

will no longer try to remove the memory. This is in compliance with normal
unbind driver core semantics, see the discussion in v2 of this patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/16/649

After a successful unbind of the driver:
- OSPM ejects of the memory device cannot proceed, as acpi_eject_store will
return -ENODEV on missing driver.
- SCI ejects of the memory device also cannot proceed, as they will also get
a "driver data is NULL" error.
So the memory can continue to be used safely after unbind.

Signed-off-by: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Wen Congyang Nov. 24, 2012, 4:23 p.m. UTC | #1
At 2012/11/24 1:50, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
> Offlining and removal of memory is now done in the prepare_remove callback,
> not in the remove callback.
> 
> The prepare_remove callback will be called when trying to remove a memory device
> with the following ways:
> 
> 1. send eject request by SCI
> 2. echo 1>/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> 
> Note that unbinding the acpi driver from a memory device with:
> echo "PNP0C80:XX">  /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> 
> will no longer try to remove the memory. This is in compliance with normal
> unbind driver core semantics, see the discussion in v2 of this patchset:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/16/649

If we don't remove it when unbinding it, it may cause kernel panicked.

I have explained in another mail.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> After a successful unbind of the driver:
> - OSPM ejects of the memory device cannot proceed, as acpi_eject_store will
> return -ENODEV on missing driver.
> - SCI ejects of the memory device also cannot proceed, as they will also get
> a "driver data is NULL" error.
> So the memory can continue to be used safely after unbind.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasilis Liaskovitis<vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
>   1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> index eb30e5a..d0cfbd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
>   static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device);
>   static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
> +static int acpi_memory_device_prepare_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
> 
>   static const struct acpi_device_id memory_device_ids[] = {
>   	{ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_HID, 0},
> @@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_memory_device_driver = {
>   	.ops = {
>   		.add = acpi_memory_device_add,
>   		.remove = acpi_memory_device_remove,
> +		.prepare_remove = acpi_memory_device_prepare_remove,
>   		},
>   };
> 
> @@ -448,6 +450,20 @@ static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>   static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>   {
>   	struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
> +
> +	if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
> +
> +	acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int acpi_memory_device_prepare_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
>   	int result;
> 
>   	if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
> @@ -459,8 +475,6 @@ static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>   	if (result)
>   		return result;
> 
> -	acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device);
> -
>   	return 0;
>   }
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
index eb30e5a..d0cfbd9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
 static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device);
 static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
+static int acpi_memory_device_prepare_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
 
 static const struct acpi_device_id memory_device_ids[] = {
 	{ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_HID, 0},
@@ -69,6 +70,7 @@  static struct acpi_driver acpi_memory_device_driver = {
 	.ops = {
 		.add = acpi_memory_device_add,
 		.remove = acpi_memory_device_remove,
+		.prepare_remove = acpi_memory_device_prepare_remove,
 		},
 };
 
@@ -448,6 +450,20 @@  static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
 {
 	struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
+
+	if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
+
+	acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int acpi_memory_device_prepare_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
+{
+	struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
 	int result;
 
 	if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
@@ -459,8 +475,6 @@  static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
 	if (result)
 		return result;
 
-	acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device);
-
 	return 0;
 }