From patchwork Thu Jan 24 09:38:07 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: tangchen X-Patchwork-Id: 2030171 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-acpi@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C3D3FDBC for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752959Ab3AXJjS (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:39:18 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:31932 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752824Ab3AXJjG (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:39:06 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,529,1355068800"; d="scan'208";a="6640643" Received: from unknown (HELO tang.cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.250.3]) by song.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2013 17:36:52 +0800 Received: from fnstmail02.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com (tang.cn.fujitsu.com [127.0.0.1]) by tang.cn.fujitsu.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r0O9cuNB021534; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:38:59 +0800 Received: from tangchen.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com ([10.167.225.117]) by fnstmail02.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3) with ESMTP id 2013012417375778-28832 ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:37:57 +0800 From: Tang Chen To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl, len.brown@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, minchan.kim@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, cl@linux.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, wujianguo@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, hpa@zytor.com, linfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, glommer@parallels.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com, julian.calaby@gmail.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpu-hotplug, memory-hotplug: Remove __cpuinit declaration of numa_clear_node(). Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:38:07 +0800 Message-Id: <1359020287-11661-3-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.1 In-Reply-To: <1359020287-11661-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1359020287-11661-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/01/24 17:37:57, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/01/24 17:38:02, Serialize complete at 2013/01/24 17:38:02 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org numa_clear_node() will be used by check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node() when we do node hotplug. So it is no longer a __cpuinit function. Do not declare it as a __cpuinit function, otherwise it will cause section mismatch warning when compiling. Signed-off-by: Tang Chen --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 0624c85..6864b08 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ void __cpuinit numa_set_node(int cpu, int node) set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node); } -void __cpuinit numa_clear_node(int cpu) +void numa_clear_node(int cpu) { numa_set_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE); }