| Message ID | 1394989397-2733-4-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c index edeed1d..db49e9e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c @@ -33,10 +33,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_pnp_device_ids[]= { /* ide */ {"PNP0600"}, /* Generic ESDI/IDE/ATA compatible hard disk controller */ /* ns558 */ - {"@P@0001"}, /* ALS 100 */ - {"@P@0020"}, /* ALS 200 */ - {"@P@1001"}, /* ALS 100+ */ - {"@P@2001"}, /* ALS 120 */ {"ASB16fd"}, /* AdLib NSC16 */ {"AZT3001"}, /* AZT1008 */ {"CDC0001"}, /* Opl3-SAx */
The acpi pnp scan handler id list just copies all the ids from all the struct pnp_device_id instances, but some of them do not comply with the ACPI PNP id rule (3 Alpha Charactors + 4 Hex numbers). For those ids, the coressponding devices will never be enumerated via ACPI, so it is safe to remove those ids from the PNPACPI white list. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> --- drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)