diff mbox

[RFC,1/2] ACPICA: Add acpi_check_gpe_method() to check GPE method

Message ID 1404802679-24019-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

lan,Tianyu July 8, 2014, 6:57 a.m. UTC
This patch is to expose acpi_check_gpe_method() to check whether there
is a GPE method for the given gpe. Enabling ACPI button devices' gpes
will depend on the new function's result.

Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/acpi/acpixf.h         |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Rafael J. Wysocki July 8, 2014, 1:19 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 02:57:57 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> This patch is to expose acpi_check_gpe_method() to check whether there
> is a GPE method for the given gpe. Enabling ACPI button devices' gpes
> will depend on the new function's result.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/acpi/acpixf.h         |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
> index 11e5803..0fcb248 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,44 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_remove_fixed_event_handler)
>  
>  /*******************************************************************************
>   *
> + * FUNCTION:    acpi_check_gpe_method
> + *
> + * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for FADT
> + *                                defined GPEs)
> + *              gpe_number      - The event to remove a handler
> + *
> + * RETURN:      Status
> + *
> + * DESCRIPTION: Check whether the given GPE has associated event method.
> + *
> + ******************************************************************************/
> +acpi_status
> +acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number)

This should be a boolean routine (ie. returning 0 or 1) called something like
acpi_gpe_has_method() that will return 1 if there's a method for the given GPE
and 0 otherwise.

> +{
> +	struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info;
> +	acpi_status status = AE_NOT_EXIST;
> +	acpi_cpu_flags flags;
> +
> +	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_check_gpe_method);
> +
> +	flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
> +	gpe_event_info = acpi_ev_get_gpe_event_info(gpe_device, gpe_number);
> +	if (!gpe_event_info) {
> +		status = AE_ERROR;
> +		goto unlock_and_exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD)
> +		status = AE_OK;
> +
> +unlock_and_exit:
> +	acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
> +	return status;
> +}
> +ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_check_gpe_method)
> +
> +/*******************************************************************************
> + *
>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_install_gpe_handler
>   *
>   * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for FADT
> @@ -821,7 +859,6 @@ free_and_exit:
>  	ACPI_FREE(handler);
>  	goto unlock_and_exit;
>  }
> -
>  ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_install_gpe_handler)
>  
>  /*******************************************************************************
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpixf.h b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> index 35b525c..5b475c6 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> @@ -554,6 +554,9 @@ ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>  							  address,
>  							  void *context))
>  ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
> +				acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device,
> +							u32 gpe_number))
> +ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>  				 acpi_remove_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
>  							 u32 gpe_number,
>  							 acpi_gpe_handler
>
Moore, Robert July 10, 2014, 7:32 p.m. UTC | #2
Since what is returned by this interface is essentially a piece of information about the particular GPE, I think that it might be better to generalize this interface to a "GetInfo" type of interface that returns a few pieces of information about the GPE.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lan, Tianyu
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 11:58 PM
> To: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J; lenb@kernel.org
> Cc: Lan, Tianyu; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ACPICA: Add acpi_check_gpe_method() to check GPE
> method
> 
> This patch is to expose acpi_check_gpe_method() to check whether there is
> a GPE method for the given gpe. Enabling ACPI button devices' gpes will
> depend on the new function's result.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c | 39
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/acpi/acpixf.h         |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
> index 11e5803..0fcb248 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,44 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_remove_fixed_event_handler)
> 
> 
> /*************************************************************************
> ******
>   *
> + * FUNCTION:    acpi_check_gpe_method
> + *
> + * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for
> FADT
> + *                                defined GPEs)
> + *              gpe_number      - The event to remove a handler
> + *
> + * RETURN:      Status
> + *
> + * DESCRIPTION: Check whether the given GPE has associated event method.
> + *
> +
> +***********************************************************************
> +*******/
> +acpi_status
> +acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number) {
> +	struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info;
> +	acpi_status status = AE_NOT_EXIST;
> +	acpi_cpu_flags flags;
> +
> +	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_check_gpe_method);
> +
> +	flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
> +	gpe_event_info = acpi_ev_get_gpe_event_info(gpe_device, gpe_number);
> +	if (!gpe_event_info) {
> +		status = AE_ERROR;
> +		goto unlock_and_exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD)
> +		status = AE_OK;
> +
> +unlock_and_exit:
> +	acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
> +	return status;
> +}
> +ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_check_gpe_method)
> +
> +/**********************************************************************
> +*********
> + *
>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_install_gpe_handler
>   *
>   * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for
> FADT
> @@ -821,7 +859,6 @@ free_and_exit:
>  	ACPI_FREE(handler);
>  	goto unlock_and_exit;
>  }
> -
>  ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_install_gpe_handler)
> 
> 
> /*************************************************************************
> ******
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpixf.h b/include/acpi/acpixf.h index
> 35b525c..5b475c6 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> @@ -554,6 +554,9 @@ ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>  							  address,
>  							  void *context))
>  ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
> +				acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device,
> +							u32 gpe_number))
> +ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>  				 acpi_remove_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
>  							 u32 gpe_number,
>  							 acpi_gpe_handler
> --
> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lan,Tianyu July 11, 2014, 2:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2014?07?11? 03:32, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Since what is returned by this interface is essentially a piece of information about the particular GPE, I think that it might be better to generalize this interface to a "GetInfo" type of interface that returns a few pieces of information about the GPE.
> 
Hi Bob:

	Thanks for your review. Yes, that's good suggestion. But Rafael has new
solution to fix the issue. So this patch maybe not necessary.

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lan, Tianyu
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 11:58 PM
>> To: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J; lenb@kernel.org
>> Cc: Lan, Tianyu; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ACPICA: Add acpi_check_gpe_method() to check GPE
>> method
>>
>> This patch is to expose acpi_check_gpe_method() to check whether there is
>> a GPE method for the given gpe. Enabling ACPI button devices' gpes will
>> depend on the new function's result.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c | 39
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/acpi/acpixf.h         |  3 +++
>>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
>> index 11e5803..0fcb248 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
>> @@ -717,6 +717,44 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_remove_fixed_event_handler)
>>
>>
>> /*************************************************************************
>> ******
>>   *
>> + * FUNCTION:    acpi_check_gpe_method
>> + *
>> + * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for
>> FADT
>> + *                                defined GPEs)
>> + *              gpe_number      - The event to remove a handler
>> + *
>> + * RETURN:      Status
>> + *
>> + * DESCRIPTION: Check whether the given GPE has associated event method.
>> + *
>> +
>> +***********************************************************************
>> +*******/
>> +acpi_status
>> +acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number) {
>> +	struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info;
>> +	acpi_status status = AE_NOT_EXIST;
>> +	acpi_cpu_flags flags;
>> +
>> +	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_check_gpe_method);
>> +
>> +	flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
>> +	gpe_event_info = acpi_ev_get_gpe_event_info(gpe_device, gpe_number);
>> +	if (!gpe_event_info) {
>> +		status = AE_ERROR;
>> +		goto unlock_and_exit;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD)
>> +		status = AE_OK;
>> +
>> +unlock_and_exit:
>> +	acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
>> +	return status;
>> +}
>> +ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_check_gpe_method)
>> +
>> +/**********************************************************************
>> +*********
>> + *
>>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_install_gpe_handler
>>   *
>>   * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for
>> FADT
>> @@ -821,7 +859,6 @@ free_and_exit:
>>  	ACPI_FREE(handler);
>>  	goto unlock_and_exit;
>>  }
>> -
>>  ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_install_gpe_handler)
>>
>>
>> /*************************************************************************
>> ******
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpixf.h b/include/acpi/acpixf.h index
>> 35b525c..5b475c6 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
>> @@ -554,6 +554,9 @@ ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>>  							  address,
>>  							  void *context))
>>  ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>> +				acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device,
>> +							u32 gpe_number))
>> +ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>>  				 acpi_remove_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
>>  							 u32 gpe_number,
>>  							 acpi_gpe_handler
>> --
>> 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
index 11e5803..0fcb248 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c
@@ -717,6 +717,44 @@  ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_remove_fixed_event_handler)
 
 /*******************************************************************************
  *
+ * FUNCTION:    acpi_check_gpe_method
+ *
+ * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for FADT
+ *                                defined GPEs)
+ *              gpe_number      - The event to remove a handler
+ *
+ * RETURN:      Status
+ *
+ * DESCRIPTION: Check whether the given GPE has associated event method.
+ *
+ ******************************************************************************/
+acpi_status
+acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info;
+	acpi_status status = AE_NOT_EXIST;
+	acpi_cpu_flags flags;
+
+	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_check_gpe_method);
+
+	flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
+	gpe_event_info = acpi_ev_get_gpe_event_info(gpe_device, gpe_number);
+	if (!gpe_event_info) {
+		status = AE_ERROR;
+		goto unlock_and_exit;
+	}
+
+	if (gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_METHOD)
+		status = AE_OK;
+
+unlock_and_exit:
+	acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
+	return status;
+}
+ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_check_gpe_method)
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ *
  * FUNCTION:    acpi_install_gpe_handler
  *
  * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device      - Namespace node for the GPE (NULL for FADT
@@ -821,7 +859,6 @@  free_and_exit:
 	ACPI_FREE(handler);
 	goto unlock_and_exit;
 }
-
 ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_install_gpe_handler)
 
 /*******************************************************************************
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpixf.h b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
index 35b525c..5b475c6 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
@@ -554,6 +554,9 @@  ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
 							  address,
 							  void *context))
 ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
+				acpi_check_gpe_method(acpi_handle gpe_device,
+							u32 gpe_number))
+ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
 				 acpi_remove_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
 							 u32 gpe_number,
 							 acpi_gpe_handler