| Message ID | 1490869877-118713-3-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Xie XiuQi, On 30/03/17 11:31, Xie XiuQi wrote: > ARM APEI extension proposal added SEI (asynchronous SError interrupt) > notification type for ARMv8. > > Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEI. In firmware > first mode, if an error source's notification type is SEI. Then GHES > could parse and report the detail error information. The APEI additions are unsafe until patch 4 as SEA can interrupt SEI and deadlock while trying to take the same set of locks. This patch needs to be after that interaction is fixed/prevented, or we should prevent it by adding a depends-on-not to the Kconfig to prevent SEI and SEA being registered at the same time. (as a short term fix). (more comments on this on that later patch) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > index e52be6a..53710a2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > @@ -625,6 +627,14 @@ asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr) bad_mode() is called in other scenarios too, for example executing an undefined instruction at EL1. You split the SError path out of the vectors in patch 7, I think we should do that here. > handler[reason], smp_processor_id(), esr, > esr_get_class_string(esr)); > > + /* > + * In firmware first mode, we could assume firmware will only generate one > + * of cper records at a time. There is no risk for one cpu to parse ghes table. > + */ I don't follow this comment, is this saying SError can't interrupt SError? We already get this guarantee as the CPU masks SError when it takes an exception. Firmware can generate multiple CPER records for a single 'event'. The CPER records are the 'Data' in ACPI:Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry, and there are 'zero or more' of these with a 'Generic Error Status Block' header that describes the overall event. (Table 18-342). I don't think we need this comment. > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI) && ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_SERROR) { > + ghes_notify_sei(); > + } > die("Oops - bad mode", regs, 0); > local_irq_disable(); > panic("bad mode"); Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi James, Sorry for reply late, and thanks for your comments. On 2017/4/1 0:20, James Morse wrote: > Hi Xie XiuQi, > > On 30/03/17 11:31, Xie XiuQi wrote: >> ARM APEI extension proposal added SEI (asynchronous SError interrupt) >> notification type for ARMv8. >> >> Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEI. In firmware >> first mode, if an error source's notification type is SEI. Then GHES >> could parse and report the detail error information. > > The APEI additions are unsafe until patch 4 as SEA can interrupt SEI and > deadlock while trying to take the same set of locks. This patch needs to be > after that interaction is fixed/prevented, or we should prevent it by adding a > depends-on-not to the Kconfig to prevent SEI and SEA being registered at the > same time. (as a short term fix). Will fix later. > > (more comments on this on that later patch) > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c >> index e52be6a..53710a2 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > >> @@ -625,6 +627,14 @@ asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr) > > bad_mode() is called in other scenarios too, for example executing an undefined > instruction at EL1. You split the SError path out of the vectors in patch 7, I > think we should do that here. > > >> handler[reason], smp_processor_id(), esr, >> esr_get_class_string(esr)); >> >> + /* >> + * In firmware first mode, we could assume firmware will only generate one >> + * of cper records at a time. There is no risk for one cpu to parse ghes table. >> + */ > > I don't follow this comment, is this saying SError can't interrupt SError? We > already get this guarantee as the CPU masks SError when it takes an exception. > > Firmware can generate multiple CPER records for a single 'event'. The CPER > records are the 'Data' in ACPI:Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry, and there > are 'zero or more' of these with a 'Generic Error Status Block' header that > describes the overall event. (Table 18-342). > > I don't think we need this comment. Thanks for your explanation, OK, I'll remove this comment. > > >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI) && ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_SERROR) { >> + ghes_notify_sei(); >> + } > >> die("Oops - bad mode", regs, 0); >> local_irq_disable(); >> panic("bad mode"); > > Thanks, > > James > > > . >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c index e52be6a..53710a2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ #include <asm/system_misc.h> #include <asm/sysreg.h> +#include <acpi/ghes.h> + static const char *handler[]= { "Synchronous Abort", "IRQ", @@ -625,6 +627,14 @@ asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr) handler[reason], smp_processor_id(), esr, esr_get_class_string(esr)); + /* + * In firmware first mode, we could assume firmware will only generate one + * of cper records at a time. There is no risk for one cpu to parse ghes table. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI) && ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_SERROR) { + ghes_notify_sei(); + } + die("Oops - bad mode", regs, 0); local_irq_disable(); panic("bad mode"); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig index b54bd33..c00c9d34 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig @@ -55,6 +55,20 @@ config ACPI_APEI_SEA option allows the OS to look for such hardware error record, and take appropriate action. +config ACPI_APEI_SEI + bool "APEI Asynchronous SError Interrupt logging/recovering support" + depends on ARM64 && ACPI_APEI_GHES + help + This option should be enabled if the system supports + firmware first handling of SEI (asynchronous SError interrupt). + + SEI happens with invalid instruction access or asynchronous exceptions + on ARMv8 systems. If a system supports firmware first handling of SEI, + the platform analyzes and handles hardware error notifications from + SEI, and it may then form a HW error record for the OS to parse and + handle. This option allows the OS to look for such hardware error + record, and take appropriate action. + config ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE bool "APEI memory error recovering support" depends on ACPI_APEI && MEMORY_FAILURE diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c index 6be0333..045d101 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c @@ -862,6 +862,51 @@ static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes) } #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */ +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI +static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sei); + +int ghes_notify_sei(void) +{ + struct ghes *ghes; + int ret = -ENOENT; + + rcu_read_lock(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, &ghes_sei, list) { + if(!ghes_proc(ghes)) + ret = 0; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + return ret; +} + +static void ghes_sei_add(struct ghes *ghes) +{ + mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex); + list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sei); + mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex); +} + +static void ghes_sei_remove(struct ghes *ghes) +{ + mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex); + list_del_rcu(&ghes->list); + mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex); + synchronize_rcu(); +} +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI */ +static inline void ghes_sei_add(struct ghes *ghes) +{ + pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEI notification which is not supported\n", + ghes->generic->header.source_id); +} + +static inline void ghes_sei_remove(struct ghes *ghes) +{ + pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEI notification which is not supported\n", + ghes->generic->header.source_id); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEI */ + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI /* * printk is not safe in NMI context. So in NMI handler, we allocate @@ -1111,6 +1156,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev) goto err; } break; + case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI: + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEI)) { + pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via SEI is not supported!\n", + generic->header.source_id); + goto err; + } + break; case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI: if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI)) { pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via NMI interrupt is not supported!\n", @@ -1179,6 +1231,9 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev) case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA: ghes_sea_add(ghes); break; + case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI: + ghes_sei_add(ghes); + break; case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI: ghes_nmi_add(ghes); break; @@ -1224,6 +1279,9 @@ static int ghes_remove(struct platform_device *ghes_dev) case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA: ghes_sea_remove(ghes); break; + case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI: + ghes_sei_remove(ghes); + break; case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI: ghes_nmi_remove(ghes); break; diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h index 2a727dc..10d752e 100644 --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h @@ -100,5 +100,6 @@ static inline void *acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(struct acpi_hest_generic_data } int ghes_notify_sea(void); +int ghes_notify_sei(void); #endif /* GHES_H */
ARM APEI extension proposal added SEI (asynchronous SError interrupt) notification type for ARMv8. Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEI. In firmware first mode, if an error source's notification type is SEI. Then GHES could parse and report the detail error information. Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 10 ++++++++ drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++ drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/acpi/ghes.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+)