diff mbox

[v3,1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA notification type

Message ID 1506602498-25752-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Dongjiu Geng Sept. 28, 2017, 12:41 p.m. UTC
In current code logic, the two functions ghes_sea_add() and
ghes_sea_remove() are only called when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
is defined. If not, it will return errors in the ghes_probe()
and not continue. If the probe is failed, the ghes_sea_remove()
also has no chance to be called. Hence, remove the unnecessary
handling when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA is not defined.

In the firmware-first RAS solution, the IPA fault address recorded
by hpfar_el2 may be UNKNOWN, and also current code does not use it,
so remove it.

Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>

---
v2->v3:
1. remove the fault_ipa address
If ESR_ELx.DFSC is Synchronous External Abort on memory access(0b010000),
the hpfar_el2's value will be UNKNOWN, so this value is not accurate.

It is ever discussed here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/8/623
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                |  2 +-
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c             | 14 --------------
 virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                   |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Comments

gengdongjiu Oct. 12, 2017, 6:30 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi James/Rafael/Borislav,

what is your comments about these two patches? Seems they are pending
long time, I will appreciate that if you can give some review
comments. Thanks very much, Tyler has tested the second patch.

[PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: apei: remove the unused dead-code for SEA notification type
[PATCH v3 2/2] acpi: apei: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8


2017-09-28 20:41 GMT+08:00 Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>:
> In current code logic, the two functions ghes_sea_add() and
> ghes_sea_remove() are only called when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> is defined. If not, it will return errors in the ghes_probe()
> and not continue. If the probe is failed, the ghes_sea_remove()
> also has no chance to be called. Hence, remove the unnecessary
> handling when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA is not defined.
>
> In the firmware-first RAS solution, the IPA fault address recorded
> by hpfar_el2 may be UNKNOWN, and also current code does not use it,
> so remove it.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> 1. remove the fault_ipa address
> If ESR_ELx.DFSC is Synchronous External Abort on memory access(0b010000),
> the hpfar_el2's value will be UNKNOWN, so this value is not accurate.
>
> It is ever discussed here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/8/623
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h   |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                |  2 +-
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c             | 14 --------------
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                   |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
> index 8c4a89f..5b53a1c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_idle)(void);
>
>  extern unsigned int user_debug;
>
> -static inline int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
> +static inline int handle_guest_sea(unsigned int esr)
>  {
>         return -1;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> index 07aa8e3..3f0d0a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>         __show_ratelimited;                                             \
>  })
>
> -int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr);
> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned int esr);
>
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 2509e4f..13391f4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
>   * and non-zero if there was an error processing the error or there was
>   * no error to process.
>   */
> -int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned int esr)
>  {
>         int ret = -ENOENT;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index d661d45..c15a08d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_hed = {
>         .notifier_call = ghes_notify_hed,
>  };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>  static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
>
>  /*
> @@ -848,19 +847,6 @@ static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
>         mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
>         synchronize_rcu();
>  }
> -#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
> -static inline void ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
> -{
> -       pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
> -              ghes->generic->header.source_id);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
> -{
> -       pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
> -              ghes->generic->header.source_id);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
>  /*
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index 2ea21da..07636c2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>          * is no need to pass the error into the guest.
>          */
>         if (is_abort_sea(fault_status)) {
> -               if (!handle_guest_sea(fault_ipa, kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
> +               if (!handle_guest_sea(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
>                         return 1;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.10.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Borislav Petkov Oct. 13, 2017, 1:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:41:37PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> In current code logic, the two functions ghes_sea_add() and
> ghes_sea_remove() are only called when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> is defined. If not, it will return errors in the ghes_probe()
> and not continue. If the probe is failed, the ghes_sea_remove()
> also has no chance to be called. Hence, remove the unnecessary
> handling when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA is not defined.
> 
> In the firmware-first RAS solution, the IPA fault address recorded
> by hpfar_el2 may be UNKNOWN, and also current code does not use it,
> so remove it.

...

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index d661d45..c15a08d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_hed = {
>  	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_hed,
>  };
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>  static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);

But now those get compiled in on x86 where there's no SEA and where we
don't need them. So no, I don't think this patch is correct.
Dongjiu Geng Oct. 15, 2017, 8:35 a.m. UTC | #3
Borislav,
  Thank you for your time to review it.

On 2017/10/13 21:21, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>  	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_hed,
>>  };
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
>>  static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
> But now those get compiled in on x86 where there's no SEA and where we
> don't need them. So no, I don't think this patch is correct.

If have updated the patch for the x86, you can review the version 4 patches.
thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 8c4a89f..5b53a1c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@  extern void (*arm_pm_idle)(void);
 
 extern unsigned int user_debug;
 
-static inline int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
+static inline int handle_guest_sea(unsigned int esr)
 {
 	return -1;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 07aa8e3..3f0d0a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@  extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
 	__show_ratelimited;						\
 })
 
-int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr);
+int handle_guest_sea(unsigned int esr);
 
 #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 2509e4f..13391f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@  static const struct fault_info fault_info[] = {
  * and non-zero if there was an error processing the error or there was
  * no error to process.
  */
-int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
+int handle_guest_sea(unsigned int esr)
 {
 	int ret = -ENOENT;
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index d661d45..c15a08d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -813,7 +813,6 @@  static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_hed = {
 	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_hed,
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
 static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
 
 /*
@@ -848,19 +847,6 @@  static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
 	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
 	synchronize_rcu();
 }
-#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
-static inline void ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
-{
-	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
-	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
-}
-
-static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
-{
-	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
-	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
 /*
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index 2ea21da..07636c2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@  int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	 * is no need to pass the error into the guest.
 	 */
 	if (is_abort_sea(fault_status)) {
-		if (!handle_guest_sea(fault_ipa, kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
+		if (!handle_guest_sea(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
 			return 1;
 	}