| Message ID | 1510824595-12287-2-git-send-email-vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Vikas C Sajjan wrote: Thanks for splitting this up. > The platforms which support only IOAPIC mode and whose SCI INT is > greater than 16, passes SCI INT via FADT and not via MADT int src override greater? I think that's >= 16 because the legacy space is 0-15 > structure. In such cases current logic fails to handle it and throws error > "Invalid bus_irq %u for legacy override". Up to this point the changelog is informative. It just lacks the information WHY the current logic fails to handle it. > This patch fixes it. This part is completely useless. You should at least explain the concept of the fix, not the details (they can be seen from the code). Let me give you an example: Platforms which support only IOAPIC mode pass the SCI information of interrupts above the legacy space (0-15) via the FADT mechanism and not via MADT, i.e. the table parser ends up calling acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(). acpi_sci_ioapic_setup() uses mp_override_legacy_irq() to register SCI interrupts, which fails for interrupts >= 16, because it only handles interrupts 0-15. Provide a separate function to handle SCI interrupts >= 16 and invoke it conditional in acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(). This creates some code duplication, which will be cleaned up in a separate patch. See? > Signed-off-by: Vikas C Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunil.vl@hpe.com> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Lateef Attar <abdul-lateef.attar@hpe.com> This Signed-off-by chain is broken. It says: Vikas wrote the patch and handed it to Sunil Sunil handed it to Abdul Abdul sent it to lkml Which is obviously not the case. > --- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > index ef9e02e..40c24d1b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > @@ -429,6 +429,37 @@ static int mp_config_acpi_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, > return 0; > } > > +static int __init mp_register_ioapic_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, > + u8 trigger, u32 gsi) > +{ > + int ioapic; > + int pin; > + struct mpc_intsrc mp_irq; I know you copied that, but please get rid of the extra line and sort the variables in reverse fir tree fashion, i.e.: struct mpc_intsrc mp_irq; int ioapic, pin; That takes less space and is better to read/parse. > + > + /* > + * Convert 'gsi' to 'ioapic.pin'. > + */ Please make this a one line comment. It's useful, but not that important to stand out. > + ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(gsi); > + if (ioapic < 0) { > + pr_warn("Failed to find ioapic for gsi : %u\n", gsi); > + return ioapic; > + } > + > + pin = mp_find_ioapic_pin(ioapic, gsi); > + > + mp_irq.type = MP_INTSRC; > + mp_irq.irqtype = mp_INT; > + mp_irq.irqflag = (trigger << 2) | polarity; > + mp_irq.srcbus = MP_ISA_BUS; > + mp_irq.srcbusirq = bus_irq; /* IRQ */ Please get rid of these tail comments. First of all tail comments are disturbing the reading flow. Secondly these comment have exactly zero value. > + mp_irq.dstapic = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic); /* APIC ID */ > + mp_irq.dstirq = pin; /* INTIN# */ except for this one, but that information should go into that other comment above, i.e.: /* Convert 'gsi' to ioapic.pin (INTIN#) */ Other than these more formal nitpicks, the patch is fine. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Thanks for review, Thomas. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:35 PM To: Sajjan, Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net; rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kkamagui@gmail.com; mingo@kernel.org; Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur <sunil.vl@hpe.com>; Attar, Abdul Lateef <abdul-lateef.attar@hpe.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi/x86: Fix improper handling of SCI INT for platforms supporting only IOAPIC mode On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Vikas C Sajjan wrote: Thanks for splitting this up. > The platforms which support only IOAPIC mode and whose SCI INT is > greater than 16, passes SCI INT via FADT and not via MADT int src > override greater? I think that's >= 16 because the legacy space is 0-15 yes, It should be >=16. Will modify it. > structure. In such cases current logic fails to handle it and throws > error "Invalid bus_irq %u for legacy override". Up to this point the changelog is informative. It just lacks the information WHY the current logic fails to handle it. > This patch fixes it. This part is completely useless. You should at least explain the concept of the fix, not the details (they can be seen from the code). Sure, will remove this part. Let me give you an example: Platforms which support only IOAPIC mode pass the SCI information of interrupts above the legacy space (0-15) via the FADT mechanism and not via MADT, i.e. the table parser ends up calling acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(). acpi_sci_ioapic_setup() uses mp_override_legacy_irq() to register SCI interrupts, which fails for interrupts >= 16, because it only handles interrupts 0-15. Provide a separate function to handle SCI interrupts >= 16 and invoke it conditional in acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(). This creates some code duplication, which will be cleaned up in a separate patch. See? Thanks for the example. Will give details on why the current logic fails and high level view of the fix. > Signed-off-by: Vikas C Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunil.vl@hpe.com> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Lateef Attar <abdul-lateef.attar@hpe.com> This Signed-off-by chain is broken. It says: Vikas wrote the patch and handed it to Sunil Sunil handed it to Abdul Abdul sent it to lkml Which is obviously not the case. 3 of us worked on it, hence I had put all the 3 "Signed-off-by". Are you suggesting to call-out who did what. Is that what you mean, when you say "Signed-off-by chain is broken". > --- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 37 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > index ef9e02e..40c24d1b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c > @@ -429,6 +429,37 @@ static int mp_config_acpi_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, > return 0; > } > > +static int __init mp_register_ioapic_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, > + u8 trigger, u32 gsi) > +{ > + int ioapic; > + int pin; > + struct mpc_intsrc mp_irq; I know you copied that, but please get rid of the extra line and sort the variables in reverse fir tree fashion, i.e.: struct mpc_intsrc mp_irq; int ioapic, pin; That takes less space and is better to read/parse. Sure, will do. > + > + /* > + * Convert 'gsi' to 'ioapic.pin'. > + */ Please make this a one line comment. It's useful, but not that important to stand out. OK. > + ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(gsi); > + if (ioapic < 0) { > + pr_warn("Failed to find ioapic for gsi : %u\n", gsi); > + return ioapic; > + } > + > + pin = mp_find_ioapic_pin(ioapic, gsi); > + > + mp_irq.type = MP_INTSRC; > + mp_irq.irqtype = mp_INT; > + mp_irq.irqflag = (trigger << 2) | polarity; > + mp_irq.srcbus = MP_ISA_BUS; > + mp_irq.srcbusirq = bus_irq; /* IRQ */ Please get rid of these tail comments. First of all tail comments are disturbing the reading flow. Secondly these comment have exactly zero value. OK. > + mp_irq.dstapic = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic); /* APIC ID */ > + mp_irq.dstirq = pin; /* INTIN# */ except for this one, but that information should go into that other comment above, i.e.: /* Convert 'gsi' to ioapic.pin (INTIN#) */ Other than these more formal nitpicks, the patch is fine. Thank you, Thomas. Thanks, Tglx Thanks Vikas Sajjan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Sajjan, Vikas C wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de] > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:35 PM > To: Sajjan, Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com> > Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net; rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kkamagui@gmail.com; mingo@kernel.org; Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur <sunil.vl@hpe.com>; Attar, Abdul Lateef <abdul-lateef.attar@hpe.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi/x86: Fix improper handling of SCI INT for platforms supporting only IOAPIC mode Can you please fix your mail client to not pointlessly copy the full mail header? On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: is enough. The rest is in the real mail headers already. > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Vikas C Sajjan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Vikas C Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunil.vl@hpe.com> > > Signed-off-by: Abdul Lateef Attar <abdul-lateef.attar@hpe.com> > > This Signed-off-by chain is broken. It says: > > Vikas wrote the patch and handed it to Sunil > Sunil handed it to Abdul > Abdul sent it to lkml > > Which is obviously not the case. > 3 of us worked on it, hence I had put all the 3 "Signed-off-by". Are you > suggesting to call-out who did what. Is that what you mean, when you say > "Signed-off-by chain is broken". No. As I explained above. The Signed-off-by is a chain. The first one is from the author. The following ones are from people who handled, transported or applied the patch. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst the chapter: Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 for further clarification. Unfortunately we have no canonical way to express joint develoment, but we have used non formal tags for that, like Co-developed-by: which give credits to the people who were involved in the development. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c index ef9e02e..40c24d1b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c @@ -429,6 +429,37 @@ static int mp_config_acpi_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, return 0; } +static int __init mp_register_ioapic_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, + u8 trigger, u32 gsi) +{ + int ioapic; + int pin; + struct mpc_intsrc mp_irq; + + /* + * Convert 'gsi' to 'ioapic.pin'. + */ + ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(gsi); + if (ioapic < 0) { + pr_warn("Failed to find ioapic for gsi : %u\n", gsi); + return ioapic; + } + + pin = mp_find_ioapic_pin(ioapic, gsi); + + mp_irq.type = MP_INTSRC; + mp_irq.irqtype = mp_INT; + mp_irq.irqflag = (trigger << 2) | polarity; + mp_irq.srcbus = MP_ISA_BUS; + mp_irq.srcbusirq = bus_irq; /* IRQ */ + mp_irq.dstapic = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic); /* APIC ID */ + mp_irq.dstirq = pin; /* INTIN# */ + + mp_save_irq(&mp_irq); + + return 0; +} + static int __init acpi_parse_ioapic(struct acpi_subtable_header * header, const unsigned long end) { @@ -473,7 +504,11 @@ static void __init acpi_sci_ioapic_setup(u8 bus_irq, u16 polarity, u16 trigger, if (acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK) polarity = acpi_sci_flags & ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_MASK; - mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi); + if (bus_irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY) + mp_override_legacy_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi); + else + mp_register_ioapic_irq(bus_irq, polarity, trigger, gsi); + acpi_penalize_sci_irq(bus_irq, trigger, polarity); /*