diff mbox

[v2] drivers: base: cacheinfo: use OF property_read_u32 instead of get_property,read_number

Message ID 1526907189-10031-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Sudeep Holla May 21, 2018, 12:53 p.m. UTC
of_property_read_u32 searches for a property in a device node and read
a 32-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the
property and then read 32-bit value using of_read_number, we can
simplify it by using of_property_read_u32.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Hi Andy,

Ignore my comment on compile errors error with Werror=incompatible-pointer-types
I was so hung up on _u64 version and didn't realise that we were using 32-bit
with of_read_number originally.

Regards,
Sudeep

v1->v2:
	- Replaced use of of_property_read_u64 with of_property_read_u32
	- Also removed the local variables as Andy initially suggested

--
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Andy Shevchenko June 5, 2018, 4:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> of_property_read_u32 searches for a property in a device node and read
> a 32-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the
> property and then read 32-bit value using of_read_number, we can
> simplify it by using of_property_read_u32.
>

LGTM.
Thanks!

> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Ignore my comment on compile errors error with Werror=incompatible-pointer-types
> I was so hung up on _u64 version and didn't realise that we were using 32-bit
> with of_read_number originally.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> v1->v2:
>         - Replaced use of of_property_read_u64 with of_property_read_u32
>         - Also removed the local variables as Andy initially suggested
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> index 2880e2ab01f5..5d5b5988e88b 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -74,52 +74,48 @@ static inline int get_cacheinfo_idx(enum cache_type type)
>  static void cache_size(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct device_node *np)
>  {
>         const char *propname;
> -       const __be32 *cache_size;
>         int ct_idx;
>
>         ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
>         propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].size_prop;
>
> -       cache_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
> -       if (cache_size)
> -               this_leaf->size = of_read_number(cache_size, 1);
> +       if (of_property_read_u32(np, propname, &this_leaf->size))
> +               this_leaf->size = 0;
>  }
>
>  /* not cache_line_size() because that's a macro in include/linux/cache.h */
>  static void cache_get_line_size(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
>                                 struct device_node *np)
>  {
> -       const __be32 *line_size;
>         int i, lim, ct_idx;
>
>         ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
>         lim = ARRAY_SIZE(cache_type_info[ct_idx].line_size_props);
>
>         for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
> +               int ret;
> +               u32 line_size;
>                 const char *propname;
>
>                 propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].line_size_props[i];
> -               line_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
> -               if (line_size)
> +               ret = of_property_read_u32(np, propname, &line_size);
> +               if (!ret) {
> +                       this_leaf->coherency_line_size = line_size;
>                         break;
> +               }
>         }
> -
> -       if (line_size)
> -               this_leaf->coherency_line_size = of_read_number(line_size, 1);
>  }
>
>  static void cache_nr_sets(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct device_node *np)
>  {
>         const char *propname;
> -       const __be32 *nr_sets;
>         int ct_idx;
>
>         ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
>         propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].nr_sets_prop;
>
> -       nr_sets = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
> -       if (nr_sets)
> -               this_leaf->number_of_sets = of_read_number(nr_sets, 1);
> +       if (of_property_read_u32(np, propname, &this_leaf->number_of_sets))
> +               this_leaf->number_of_sets = 0;
>  }
>
>  static void cache_associativity(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Sudeep Holla June 5, 2018, 4:26 p.m. UTC | #2
On 05/06/18 17:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>> of_property_read_u32 searches for a property in a device node and read
>> a 32-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the
>> property and then read 32-bit value using of_read_number, we can
>> simplify it by using of_property_read_u32.
>>
> 
> LGTM.
> Thanks!
> 

Thanks, can I take is Ack ?

Anyways it's too late for v4.18, will repost after the merge window for
v4.19 with your Ack if you agree.
Andy Shevchenko June 5, 2018, 4:34 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/06/18 17:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>>> of_property_read_u32 searches for a property in a device node and read
>>> a 32-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the
>>> property and then read 32-bit value using of_read_number, we can
>>> simplify it by using of_property_read_u32.
>>>
>>
>> LGTM.
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Thanks, can I take is Ack ?
>
> Anyways it's too late for v4.18, will repost after the merge window for
> v4.19 with your Ack if you agree.

You can consider like this, though it makes a little change here since
I'm not a maintainer of the code.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index 2880e2ab01f5..5d5b5988e88b 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -74,52 +74,48 @@  static inline int get_cacheinfo_idx(enum cache_type type)
 static void cache_size(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct device_node *np)
 {
 	const char *propname;
-	const __be32 *cache_size;
 	int ct_idx;

 	ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
 	propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].size_prop;

-	cache_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
-	if (cache_size)
-		this_leaf->size = of_read_number(cache_size, 1);
+	if (of_property_read_u32(np, propname, &this_leaf->size))
+		this_leaf->size = 0;
 }

 /* not cache_line_size() because that's a macro in include/linux/cache.h */
 static void cache_get_line_size(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
 				struct device_node *np)
 {
-	const __be32 *line_size;
 	int i, lim, ct_idx;

 	ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
 	lim = ARRAY_SIZE(cache_type_info[ct_idx].line_size_props);

 	for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
+		int ret;
+		u32 line_size;
 		const char *propname;

 		propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].line_size_props[i];
-		line_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
-		if (line_size)
+		ret = of_property_read_u32(np, propname, &line_size);
+		if (!ret) {
+			this_leaf->coherency_line_size = line_size;
 			break;
+		}
 	}
-
-	if (line_size)
-		this_leaf->coherency_line_size = of_read_number(line_size, 1);
 }

 static void cache_nr_sets(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct device_node *np)
 {
 	const char *propname;
-	const __be32 *nr_sets;
 	int ct_idx;

 	ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
 	propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].nr_sets_prop;

-	nr_sets = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
-	if (nr_sets)
-		this_leaf->number_of_sets = of_read_number(nr_sets, 1);
+	if (of_property_read_u32(np, propname, &this_leaf->number_of_sets))
+		this_leaf->number_of_sets = 0;
 }

 static void cache_associativity(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)