From patchwork Tue Jul 21 09:59:05 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hanjun Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 11675295 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BCF1667 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD342080D for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729236AbgGUKGO (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 06:06:14 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:45802 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729026AbgGUKGM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 06:06:12 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5547B3394BD194B73379; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:06:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ibm.site (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:06:00 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: , , Hanjun Guo Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: NUMA: Remove the useless sub table pointer check Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:59:05 +0800 Message-ID: <1595325546-63774-3-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1595325546-63774-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> References: <1595325546-63774-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org In acpi_parse_entries_array(), the subtable entries (entry.hdr) will never be NULL, so for ACPI subtable handler in struct acpi_subtable_proc, will never handle NULL subtable entries, remove those useless subtable pointer checks in those callback handlers. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo --- drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c index 5be5a97..3d430b0 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c @@ -291,8 +291,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table) struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *processor_affinity; processor_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *)header; - if (!processor_affinity) - return -EINVAL; acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common); @@ -309,8 +307,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table) struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *processor_affinity; processor_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *)header; - if (!processor_affinity) - return -EINVAL; acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common); @@ -327,8 +323,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table) struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *processor_affinity; processor_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *)header; - if (!processor_affinity) - return -EINVAL; acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common); @@ -347,8 +341,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table) struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *memory_affinity; memory_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)header; - if (!memory_affinity) - return -EINVAL; acpi_table_print_srat_entry(&header->common);