[1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf

Commit Message

[e-mail] Feb. 20, 2009, 12:53 a.m. UTC

Change structure name to make the code look simpler. No functionality
change in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[e-mail]>

---

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |   44 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Comments

Len Brown March 17, 2009, 6:02 a.m. UTC | #1

Venki,
Can you refresh these to apply to top of tree?

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [e-mail]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c	2009-02-04 16:03:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c	2009-02-04 16:05:42.000000000 -0800
@@ -238,24 +238,24 @@  static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpum
 	return cmd.val;
 }
 
-struct perf_cur {
+struct perf_pair {
 	union {
 		struct {
 			u32 lo;
 			u32 hi;
 		} split;
 		u64 whole;
-	} aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
+	} aperf, mperf;
 };
 
 
 /* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
 static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
-	struct perf_cur *cur = _cur;
+	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
 
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi);
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi);
+	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
+	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
 
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@  static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_cur cur;
+	struct perf_pair cur;
 	unsigned int perf_percent;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
@@ -290,39 +290,39 @@  static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
 	 * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
 	 * an approximate value.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) {
+	if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
 		int shift_count;
 		u32 h;
 
-		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi);
+		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
 		shift_count = fls(h);
 
-		cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) {
+	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
 		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) /
-				cur.mperf_cur.split.lo;
+	if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
+		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) /
+				cur.mperf.split.lo;
 	else
 		perf_percent = 0;
 
 #else
-	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) {
+	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
 		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
 	}
 
-	if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) /
-				cur.mperf_cur.whole;
+	if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
+		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) /
+				cur.mperf.whole;
 	else
 		perf_percent = 0;