diff mbox

[06/15] PCI/acpiphp: Convert "acpiphp" sub-driver's functionality to built-in only

Message ID 20121207062530.11051.47869.stgit@amt.stowe (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Myron Stowe Dec. 7, 2012, 6:25 a.m. UTC
The "ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller ("acpiphp")" sub-driver may be compiled
as a module.  Kernel modules are instantiated somewhat randomly - the
order in which they are linked as the kernel as built - thus if there are
any dependencies on the ordering of attaching sub-drivers, they can not be
effectively dealt with.

This patch series resolves any potential sequencing inter-dependencies by
converting "acpiphp" sub-driver's functionality to being only supported as
statically built-in to the kernel.  Inter-dependencies can then be
effectively handled by explicitly sequencing the addition of such
functionality.

Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
---

 drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig |    5 +----
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Yinghai Lu Dec. 7, 2012, 6:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> wrote:
> The "ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller ("acpiphp")" sub-driver may be compiled
> as a module.  Kernel modules are instantiated somewhat randomly - the
> order in which they are linked as the kernel as built - thus if there are
> any dependencies on the ordering of attaching sub-drivers, they can not be
> effectively dealt with.
>
> This patch series resolves any potential sequencing inter-dependencies by
> converting "acpiphp" sub-driver's functionality to being only supported as
> statically built-in to the kernel.  Inter-dependencies can then be
> effectively handled by explicitly sequencing the addition of such
> functionality.

some slots may support both acpiphp and pciehp.

if make acpiphp to be built-in, user do not have choice anymore.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Myron Stowe Dec. 7, 2012, 7:11 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 22:48 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The "ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller ("acpiphp")" sub-driver may be compiled
> > as a module.  Kernel modules are instantiated somewhat randomly - the
> > order in which they are linked as the kernel as built - thus if there are
> > any dependencies on the ordering of attaching sub-drivers, they can not be
> > effectively dealt with.
> >
> > This patch series resolves any potential sequencing inter-dependencies by
> > converting "acpiphp" sub-driver's functionality to being only supported as
> > statically built-in to the kernel.  Inter-dependencies can then be
> > effectively handled by explicitly sequencing the addition of such
> > functionality.
> 
> some slots may support both acpiphp and pciehp.
> 
> if make acpiphp to be built-in, user do not have choice anymore.

What area are you worried about and how do we exercise that choice
today?

Here is my current understanding to set a little context -

I see the following call chains with respect to pciehp and acpiphp:

  pcied_init			# pciehp module_init
    pciehp_firmware_init
      pciehp_acpi_slot_detection_init
        parse_detect_mode	#pcie, acpi, auto (default)
    pcie_port_service_register


  acpiphp_init					# module_init
    init_acpi
      acpiphp_glue_init
        acpi_pci_register_driver(&acpi_pci_hp_driver)
          list_for_each_entry(root, &acpi_pci_roots, node)
            driver->add				# for \_SB_.PCI0
              add_bridge
                add_host_bridge
                  bridge = kzalloc(struct acpiphp_bridge)
                  bridge->handle = handle	# \_SB_.PCI0
                  bridge->pci_bus = root_bus	#pci_bus 0000:00
                  init_bridge_misc
                    acpi_walk_namespace(..., register_slot, ...)
                      register_slot
                        if (device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp(pdev))
                          return AE_OK

Does pciehp influence device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()?  If not, it
seems that the acpiphp driver will never attach.

Looking at ./drivers/pci/hotplug/Makefile, CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE comes
before CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI so if pciehp and acpiphp are both
configured as modules then the load order would seem to be:
  acpiphp, pciehp: acpiphp ignores, pciehp claims
  pciehp, acpiphp: pciehp claims, acpiphp ignores

To complete the matrix taking built-in vs. module into account -
  pciehp=y, acpiphp=y
    pciehp, acpiphp: pciehp claims, acpiphp ignores

  pciehp=y, acpiphp=m
    pciehp, acpiphp: pciehp claims, acpiphp ignores

  pciehp=m, acpiphp=y
    acpiphp, pciehp: acpiphp ignores, pciehp claims

The above combinations all seem to end up with pciehp claiming the slot
which raises the question: How do we get acpiphp to claim a slot today?

Thanks,
 Myron 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Yinghai


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig
index b0e46de..3bf2b82 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig
@@ -52,15 +52,12 @@  config HOTPLUG_PCI_IBM
 	  When in doubt, say N.
 
 config HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI
-	tristate "ACPI PCI Hotplug driver"
+	bool "ACPI PCI Hotplug driver"
 	depends on (!ACPI_DOCK && ACPI) || (ACPI_DOCK)
 	help
 	  Say Y here if you have a system that supports PCI Hotplug using
 	  ACPI.
 
-	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
-	  module will be called acpiphp.
-
 	  When in doubt, say N.
 
 config HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI_IBM