diff mbox

ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member

Message ID 20121219173044.12424.11336.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Bjorn Helgaas Dec. 19, 2012, 5:30 p.m. UTC
This member is never initialized and never referenced, so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Rafael Wysocki Dec. 20, 2012, 1:22 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:30:44 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This member is never initialized and never referenced, so remove it.

Sure. :-)

Do you want me to take this?

Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 7ced5dc..4f42c0e 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
>  struct acpi_pci_root {
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	struct acpi_device * device;
> -	struct acpi_pci_id id;
>  	struct pci_bus *bus;
>  	u16 segment;
>  	struct resource secondary;	/* downstream bus range */
>
Bjorn Helgaas Dec. 20, 2012, 6:37 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:30:44 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> This member is never initialized and never referenced, so remove it.
>
> Sure. :-)
>
> Do you want me to take this?

I assume you're going to push your namespace scan rework through your
tree, since most of the changes are in drivers/acpi.  That series also
touches acpi_bus.h, so probably makes the most sense for you to take
this as well.  I don't plan any future changes to the file.

There are more PCI-centric pci_root.c changes in the pipe, but we'll
have to sort those out later, I think.

Let me know if you think otherwise.

>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> ---
>>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    1 -
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> index 7ced5dc..4f42c0e 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
>>  struct acpi_pci_root {
>>       struct list_head node;
>>       struct acpi_device * device;
>> -     struct acpi_pci_id id;
>>       struct pci_bus *bus;
>>       u16 segment;
>>       struct resource secondary;      /* downstream bus range */
>>
> --
> I speak only for myself.
> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Rafael Wysocki Dec. 20, 2012, 9:20 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:37:24 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:30:44 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> This member is never initialized and never referenced, so remove it.
> >
> > Sure. :-)
> >
> > Do you want me to take this?
> 
> I assume you're going to push your namespace scan rework through your
> tree, since most of the changes are in drivers/acpi.  That series also
> touches acpi_bus.h, so probably makes the most sense for you to take
> this as well.  I don't plan any future changes to the file.

Well, I'm not planning to push the scan rework series for v3.8, I'd rather
prefer it to go into v3.9.  I'll just create a separate branch based on
v3.8-rc1 with those patches that will wait for the v3.9 merge window and
can be pulled from if necessary.

I can put the $subject patch into that branch too.

Does it sound reasonable?

> There are more PCI-centric pci_root.c changes in the pipe, but we'll
> have to sort those out later, I think.

Yup.

> Let me know if you think otherwise.

The above is fine by me.

> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    1 -
> >>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> >> index 7ced5dc..4f42c0e 100644
> >> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> >> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> >> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> >>  struct acpi_pci_root {
> >>       struct list_head node;
> >>       struct acpi_device * device;
> >> -     struct acpi_pci_id id;
> >>       struct pci_bus *bus;
> >>       u16 segment;
> >>       struct resource secondary;      /* downstream bus range */
> >>
> > --
> > I speak only for myself.
> > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 7ced5dc..4f42c0e 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -397,7 +397,6 @@  int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
 struct acpi_pci_root {
 	struct list_head node;
 	struct acpi_device * device;
-	struct acpi_pci_id id;
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	u16 segment;
 	struct resource secondary;	/* downstream bus range */