Message ID | 20140912180348.1630.24201.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 4b3b29bc7a82..003d112a783d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1249,15 +1249,8 @@ static void program_hpp_type0(struct pci_dev *dev, struct hpp_type0 *hpp) { u16 pci_cmd, pci_bctl; - if (!hpp) { - /* - * Perhaps we *should* use default settings for PCIe, but - * pciehp didn't, so we won't either. - */ - if (pci_is_pcie(dev)) - return; + if (!hpp) hpp = &pci_default_type0; - } if (hpp->revision > 1) { dev_warn(&dev->dev,
The ACPI _HPP method was defined before PCIe existed, so its documentation only mentions PCI. The _HPX Type 0 setting record is essentially identical to _HPP, but the spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.8.1) says it should be applied to PCI, PCI-X, and PCIe devices, with settings being ignored if they are not applicable. Some platforms with both conventional PCI and PCIe devices provide only _HPP (not _HPX), so treat _HPP the same way as an _HPX Type 0 record and apply it to PCIe devices as well as PCI and PCI-X. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html