| Message ID | 20180423082834.24617-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Monday, April 23, 2018 10:28:34 AM CEST Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Modules such as nouveau.ko and i915.ko have a link time dependency on > acpi_lid_open(), and due to its use of acpi_bus_register_driver(), > the button.ko module that provides it is only loadable when booted in > ACPI mode. However, the ACPI button driver can be built into the core > kernel as well, in which case the dependency can always be satisfied, > and the dependent modules can be loaded regardless of whether the > system was booted in ACPI mode or not. > > So let's fix this asymmetry by making the ACPI button driver loadable > as a module even if not booted in ACPI mode, so it can provide the > acpi_lid_open() symbol in the same way as when built into the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > --- > Could we perhaps get this into -stable as well? It is not a classic > regression, but it completely breaks, e.g., Fedora when booting in > DT mode on an ARM system. > > drivers/acpi/button.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c > index e1eee7a60fad..0506ca56c615 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c > @@ -635,4 +635,25 @@ module_param_call(lid_init_state, > NULL, 0644); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(lid_init_state, "Behavior for reporting LID initial state"); > > -module_acpi_driver(acpi_button_driver); > +/* > + * Modules such as nouveau.ko and i915.ko have a link time dependency on > + * acpi_lid_open(), and would therefore not be loadable on ACPI capable kernels > + * booted in non-ACPI mode if we use the ordinary acpi_bus_[un]register_driver > + * routines here (which only work when booted in ACPI mode) and build this > + * driver as a module. So provide our own versions instead. > + */ > +static int __acpi_bus_register_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver) > +{ > + if (!acpi_disabled) > + return acpi_bus_register_driver(driver); > + return 0; > +} I would write this as: if (acpi_disabled) return 0; return acpi_bus_register_driver(driver); and the comment can go above the (acpi_disabled) check then (bacause that's what makes the difference when ACPI is disabled). > + > +static void __acpi_bus_unregister_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver) > +{ > + if (!acpi_disabled) > + acpi_bus_unregister_driver(driver); > +} > + > +module_driver(acpi_button_driver, __acpi_bus_register_driver, > + __acpi_bus_unregister_driver); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c index e1eee7a60fad..0506ca56c615 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c @@ -635,4 +635,25 @@ module_param_call(lid_init_state, NULL, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(lid_init_state, "Behavior for reporting LID initial state"); -module_acpi_driver(acpi_button_driver); +/* + * Modules such as nouveau.ko and i915.ko have a link time dependency on + * acpi_lid_open(), and would therefore not be loadable on ACPI capable kernels + * booted in non-ACPI mode if we use the ordinary acpi_bus_[un]register_driver + * routines here (which only work when booted in ACPI mode) and build this + * driver as a module. So provide our own versions instead. + */ +static int __acpi_bus_register_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver) +{ + if (!acpi_disabled) + return acpi_bus_register_driver(driver); + return 0; +} + +static void __acpi_bus_unregister_driver(struct acpi_driver *driver) +{ + if (!acpi_disabled) + acpi_bus_unregister_driver(driver); +} + +module_driver(acpi_button_driver, __acpi_bus_register_driver, + __acpi_bus_unregister_driver);
Modules such as nouveau.ko and i915.ko have a link time dependency on acpi_lid_open(), and due to its use of acpi_bus_register_driver(), the button.ko module that provides it is only loadable when booted in ACPI mode. However, the ACPI button driver can be built into the core kernel as well, in which case the dependency can always be satisfied, and the dependent modules can be loaded regardless of whether the system was booted in ACPI mode or not. So let's fix this asymmetry by making the ACPI button driver loadable as a module even if not booted in ACPI mode, so it can provide the acpi_lid_open() symbol in the same way as when built into the kernel. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> --- Could we perhaps get this into -stable as well? It is not a classic regression, but it completely breaks, e.g., Fedora when booting in DT mode on an ARM system. drivers/acpi/button.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)