From patchwork Tue Aug 6 04:24:39 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Black X-Patchwork-Id: 11078171 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A937C13B1 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9819E28950 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 81ADE288D7; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047F4288E6 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726036AbfHFEYw (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:24:52 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:24514 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725747AbfHFEYw (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:24:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x764LwR9073521 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:24:51 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u71j1ht35-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:24:50 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 05:24:49 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 6 Aug 2019 05:24:47 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x764OkN238207620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:46 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4E6A404D; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A244A4059; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:24:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from volution.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22B8CA01F6; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:24:45 +1000 (AEST) From: Daniel Black Cc: Daniel Black , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH] acpi/hmat: ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID is deprecated in ACPI-6.3 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:24:39 +1000 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19080604-0008-0000-0000-00000305A25B X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19080604-0009-0000-0000-0000A17FA9E0 Message-Id: <20190806042440.16445-1-daniel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-06_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=868 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908060051 To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP ACPI-6.3 corresponds to when hmat revision was bumped from 1 to 2. In this version ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID was deprecated and made reserved. As such in revision 2+ we shouldn't be testing this flag. This is as per ACPI-6.3, 5.2.27.3, Table 5-145 "Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure" for Flags. Signed-off-by: Daniel Black Reviewed-by: Tao Xu --- drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c index 96b7d39a97c6..e938e34673d9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __init hmat_parse_proximity_domain(union acpi_subtable_headers *heade pr_info("HMAT: Memory Flags:%04x Processor Domain:%d Memory Domain:%d\n", p->flags, p->processor_PD, p->memory_PD); - if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID) { + if (p->flags & ACPI_HMAT_MEMORY_PD_VALID && hmat_revision == 1) { target = find_mem_target(p->memory_PD); if (!target) { pr_debug("HMAT: Memory Domain missing from SRAT\n");