From patchwork Wed Aug 21 14:52:42 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 11107197 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AF51399 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EA7233A2 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727249AbfHUOx0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:53:26 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:4754 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727696AbfHUOxZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:53:25 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CBE1B946D84C55FF265F; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:53:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrphicprd00229.huawei.com (10.123.41.22) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:53:11 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: Keith Busch , , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , , Andrew Morton , Dan Williams , Jonathan Cameron Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:52:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20190821145242.2330-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190821145242.2330-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20190821145242.2330-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.123.41.22] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Until we tell ACPI that we support generic initiators, it will have to operate in fall back domain mode and all _PXM entries should be on existing non GI domains. This patch sets the relevant OSC bit to make that happen. Note that this currently doesn't take into account whether we have the relevant setup code for a given architecture. Do we want to make this optional, or should the initial patch set just enable it for all ACPI supporting architectures? Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 1 + include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index 48bc96d45bab..9d40e465232f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT; capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT; + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT; #ifdef CONFIG_X86 if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP)) { diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 9426b9aaed86..cfa3a48f0c81 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context); #define OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT 0x00000080 #define OSC_SB_OSLPI_SUPPORT 0x00000100 #define OSC_SB_CPC_DIVERSE_HIGH_SUPPORT 0x00001000 +#define OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT 0x00002000 extern bool osc_sb_apei_support_acked; extern bool osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed;