From patchwork Mon Mar 14 04:06:32 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mario Limonciello X-Patchwork-Id: 12779511 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEC1C433EF for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 04:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231807AbiCNEIS (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:08:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57010 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229653AbiCNEIR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:08:17 -0400 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam12on2064.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.237.64]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00A683D4B5 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 21:07:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Y4ilep6W+ltJaCR8+ESxG62i0GzcZdOk1yXyARJYgUkOxERX/1q4CcwadltYd2Ke2R8IzOYRSz1JiKSLoZNFL1fF3VOEXwI4gTS42A8fDZxju9HoM7DR3C896thtnpuCLDDP1TZvUiTJI/5MOxHjBRsBbaRuKxr4aifFVbqLa/LHYShEWqnDvkPfVHfWqrspLn9imSDWI3XEtsxx40CbjpZojzHIikzaYZNtVZ7o0oK42YxgNorexVTSn09ryWzV1OK7t+93pDm2CYFaPO+qCTMZZjC5vH8SJvJ3PRQRfkRjY86sNPuk1k0H87Jv3uJqa2b5nDh2awUBAvKLmU/qDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=sRJ7qyKuqK22GV7R8lDvVJJyD2gDoSl6kOAELdJZksg=; b=VIGkY37+K+WgtXDyhBJYdkfWmw086WPXsE72Trv5VoOGy5O56rQGEiikVqyNT3SlLMMqNxaDsSe/qgYSScDcxZfoZ2Wyo9MRtisCI98d84UKDWliCkrwzj0dM9n1q94XVyUCtonk4YVxjC2y7sp5ic02iEjoHBwsxKVQI9cLUfQ6TjOZhHVJDXoU9z+q3Zo2k7F8WQlOh6m88cU+EGNjX0l1jacWqoIXfF1cSG+RnDniufjfkk3Ch3ONZKGxfmxYy7abMSP+d9MgARi5l+2Z1x/b/0wdbqTLaJ3+rIwhhCtcVVaE4oim6xRHHBakV9geIrjMYM0h5iCL35oOLjepJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=temperror (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=rjwysocki.net smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=temperror action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sRJ7qyKuqK22GV7R8lDvVJJyD2gDoSl6kOAELdJZksg=; b=zX7duzT8/NkT+yWhUfiEUK35vCip7NVB2I3m0uForvdYG6Yy2+TfLVjU9+G5ohZ6q7eVtB0B67wnWPy85AxVvpScG1ywn5LJUsLbi2NWktQ9HPrNRo4B3XoMI7DAopHpTCYbjTzG4ed2GBpcm+rjvlGQt3S0N/o39b9M0YhRXmw= Received: from BN7PR02CA0020.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:20::33) by MN2PR12MB3343.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:c2::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5061.25; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 04:07:04 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT049.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:20:cafe::8) by BN7PR02CA0020.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:20::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5061.26 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 04:07:04 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=temperror (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=temperror action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: TempError (protection.outlook.com: error in processing during lookup of amd.com: DNS Timeout) Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BN8NAM11FT049.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.177.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.5061.22 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 04:07:01 +0000 Received: from AUS-LX-MLIMONCI.amd.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 23:06:53 -0500 From: Mario Limonciello To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , CC: Mika Westerberg , , , , , "Mario Limonciello" Subject: [PATCH v7] ACPI: bus: For platform OSC negotiate capabilities Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 23:06:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20220314040632.985-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.180.168.240] X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 594a4d52-6e59-4b7c-5df4-08da057017d0 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR12MB3343:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(36840700001)(46966006)(40470700004)(4326008)(8676002)(356005)(81166007)(40460700003)(186003)(83380400001)(63350400001)(16526019)(63370400001)(86362001)(1076003)(2616005)(7696005)(336012)(426003)(6666004)(26005)(47076005)(36860700001)(36756003)(508600001)(82310400004)(316002)(54906003)(110136005)(70586007)(70206006)(8936002)(44832011)(2906002)(5660300002)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2022 04:07:01.9729 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 594a4d52-6e59-4b7c-5df4-08da057017d0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT049.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR12MB3343 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org According to the ACPI 6.4 spec: It is strongly recommended that the OS evaluate _OSC with the Query Support Flag set until _OSC returns the Capabilities Masked bit clear, to negotiate the set of features to be granted to the OS for native support; a platform may require a specific combination of features to be supported natively by an OS before granting native control of a given feature. After negotiation with the query flag set, the OS should evaluate without it so that any negotiated values can be made effective to hardware. Currently the code sends the exact same values in both executions of the _OSC and this leads to some problems on some AMD platforms in certain configurations. The following notable capabilities are set by OSPM when query is enabled: * OSC_SB_PR3_SUPPORT * OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT * OSC_SB_NATIVE_USB4_SUPPORT The first call to the platform OSC returns back a masked capabilities error because the firmware did not acknowledge OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT but it acknolwedged the others. The second call to the platform _OSC without the query flag set then fails because the OSPM still sent the exact same values. This leads to not acknowledging OSC_SB_NATIVE_USB4_SUPPORT and later USB4 PCIe tunnels can't be authorized. This problem was first introduced by commit 159d8c274fd9 ("ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag") which subtly adjusted the behavior from 719e1f5 ("ACPI: Execute platform _OSC also with query bit clear"). The _OSC was called exactly 2 times: * Once to query and request from firmware * Once to commit to firmware without query To fix this problem, continue to call the _OSC until the firmware has indicated that capabilities are no longer masked. Furthermore, to avoid the problem that commit 159d8c274fd9 ("ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag") introduced, explicitly mark support for CPC and CPPCv2 even if they were masked by the series of query calls due to table loading order on some systems. Fixes: 159d8c274fd9 ("ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag") Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- Changes from v5->v6 * Redo the series to only change acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platfrom_control This fixed a memory leak discovered from (the previously accepted and now dropped) v4. Changes from v6->v7 * Logic optimization suggested by Rafael drivers/acpi/bus.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index 07f604832fd6..0483f3cb7c53 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -329,14 +329,30 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platform_control(void) if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB", &handle))) return; - if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context))) - return; - kfree(context.ret.pointer); + do { + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context))) + return; + capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer; + if (capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] == capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD]) + capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0; + else + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] &= capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD]; + kfree(context.ret.pointer); + } while (capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD]); - /* Now run _OSC again with query flag clear */ - capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0; + /* + * Avoid problems with BIOS dynamically loading tables by indicating + * support for CPPC even if it was masked. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP)) { + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_CPC_SUPPORT; + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_CPCV2_SUPPORT; + } +#endif + /* Now run _OSC again with query flag clear */ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context))) return;