diff mbox series

ACPI: CPPC: Fix bit_offset shift in MASK_VAL macro

Message ID 20240409052310.3162495-1-jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined, archived
Headers show
Series ACPI: CPPC: Fix bit_offset shift in MASK_VAL macro | expand

Commit Message

Jarred White April 9, 2024, 5:23 a.m. UTC
Commit 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for
system memory accesses") neglected to properly wrap the bit_offset shift
when it comes to applying the mask. This may cause incorrect values to be
read and may cause the cpufreq module not be loaded.

[   11.059751] cpu_capacity: CPU0 missing/invalid highest performance.
[   11.066005] cpu_capacity: partial information: fallback to 1024 for all CPUs

Also, corrected the bitmask generation in GENMASK (extra bit being added).

Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
Signed-off-by: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
CC: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com> 
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.15+
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Jarred White April 16, 2024, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On 4/8/2024 10:23 PM, Jarred White wrote:
> Commit 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for
> system memory accesses") neglected to properly wrap the bit_offset shift
> when it comes to applying the mask. This may cause incorrect values to be
> read and may cause the cpufreq module not be loaded.
> 
> [   11.059751] cpu_capacity: CPU0 missing/invalid highest performance.
> [   11.066005] cpu_capacity: partial information: fallback to 1024 for all CPUs
> 
> Also, corrected the bitmask generation in GENMASK (extra bit being added).
> 
> Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
> Signed-off-by: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
> CC: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.15+
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index 4bfbe55553f4..00a30ca35e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
>   #define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) ((reg)->access_width ? (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
>   
>   /* Shift and apply the mask for CPC reads/writes */
> -#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) ((val) >> ((reg)->bit_offset & 			\
> -					GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width), 0)))
> +#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) (((val) >> (reg)->bit_offset) & 			\
> +					GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width) - 1, 0))
>   
>   static ssize_t show_feedback_ctrs(struct kobject *kobj,
>   		struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)

Hi Vanshi,

Could you review please?


Thanks,
Jarred
Vanshidhar Konda April 17, 2024, 5:36 p.m. UTC | #2
Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:23:09PM -0700, Jarred White wrote:
>Commit 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for
>system memory accesses") neglected to properly wrap the bit_offset shift
>when it comes to applying the mask. This may cause incorrect values to be
>read and may cause the cpufreq module not be loaded.
>
>[   11.059751] cpu_capacity: CPU0 missing/invalid highest performance.
>[   11.066005] cpu_capacity: partial information: fallback to 1024 for all CPUs
>
>Also, corrected the bitmask generation in GENMASK (extra bit being added).
>
>Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
>Signed-off-by: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
>CC: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>
>CC: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.15+
>---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>index 4bfbe55553f4..00a30ca35e78 100644
>--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
> #define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) ((reg)->access_width ? (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
>
> /* Shift and apply the mask for CPC reads/writes */
>-#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) ((val) >> ((reg)->bit_offset & 			\
>-					GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width), 0)))
>+#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) (((val) >> (reg)->bit_offset) & 			\
>+					GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width) - 1, 0))
>
> static ssize_t show_feedback_ctrs(struct kobject *kobj,
> 		struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>-- 
>2.33.8
>
Rafael J. Wysocki April 22, 2024, 4:43 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:37 PM Vanshidhar Konda
<vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>
>
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:23:09PM -0700, Jarred White wrote:
> >Commit 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for
> >system memory accesses") neglected to properly wrap the bit_offset shift
> >when it comes to applying the mask. This may cause incorrect values to be
> >read and may cause the cpufreq module not be loaded.
> >
> >[   11.059751] cpu_capacity: CPU0 missing/invalid highest performance.
> >[   11.066005] cpu_capacity: partial information: fallback to 1024 for all CPUs
> >
> >Also, corrected the bitmask generation in GENMASK (extra bit being added).
> >
> >Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
> >Signed-off-by: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
> >CC: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>
> >CC: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.15+
> >---
> > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> >index 4bfbe55553f4..00a30ca35e78 100644
> >--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> >+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> >@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
> > #define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) ((reg)->access_width ? (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
> >
> > /* Shift and apply the mask for CPC reads/writes */
> >-#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) ((val) >> ((reg)->bit_offset &                     \
> >-                                      GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width), 0)))
> >+#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) (((val) >> (reg)->bit_offset) &                    \
> >+                                      GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width) - 1, 0))
> >
> > static ssize_t show_feedback_ctrs(struct kobject *kobj,
> >               struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> >--

Applied as 6.9-rc material, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 4bfbe55553f4..00a30ca35e78 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@  show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
 #define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) ((reg)->access_width ? (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
 
 /* Shift and apply the mask for CPC reads/writes */
-#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) ((val) >> ((reg)->bit_offset & 			\
-					GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width), 0)))
+#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) (((val) >> (reg)->bit_offset) & 			\
+					GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width) - 1, 0))
 
 static ssize_t show_feedback_ctrs(struct kobject *kobj,
 		struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)