diff mbox series

[v7,07/12] platform/x86: hfi: add online and offline callback support

Message ID 20241130140703.557-8-mario.limonciello@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add support for AMD hardware feedback interface | expand

Commit Message

Mario Limonciello Nov. 30, 2024, 2:06 p.m. UTC
From: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>

There are some firmware parameters that need to be configured
when a CPU core is brought online or offline.

when CPU is online, it will initialize the workload classification
parameters to CPU firmware which will trigger the workload class ID
updating function.

Once the CPU is going to offline, it will need to disable the workload
classification function and clear the history.

Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v7:
 * move mutex to this patch
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)

Comments

Peter Zijlstra Dec. 2, 2024, 11:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 08:06:58AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:

> @@ -340,6 +416,11 @@ static int amd_hfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/amd_hfi:online",
> +				amd_hfi_online, amd_hfi_offline);

By using online notifier, you will already have tasks running on this
CPU before you initialize the HFI bits, is that okay?
Mario Limonciello Dec. 3, 2024, 8:28 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12/2/2024 05:38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 08:06:58AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> 
>> @@ -340,6 +416,11 @@ static int amd_hfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/amd_hfi:online",
>> +				amd_hfi_online, amd_hfi_offline);
> 
> By using online notifier, you will already have tasks running on this
> CPU before you initialize the HFI bits, is that okay?

Yeah; AFAICT it should be fine.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
index 9671f07c76390..922a9ff0d447a 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hfi/hfi.c
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@  struct amd_hfi_cpuinfo {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct amd_hfi_cpuinfo, amd_hfi_cpuinfo) = {.class_index = -1};
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(hfi_cpuinfo_lock);
+
 static int find_cpu_index_by_apicid(unsigned int target_apicid)
 {
 	int cpu_index;
@@ -235,6 +237,80 @@  static int amd_set_hfi_ipcc_score(struct amd_hfi_cpuinfo *hfi_cpuinfo, int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int amd_hfi_set_state(unsigned int cpu, bool state)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS_CONFIG, state);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, AMD_WORKLOAD_HRST, 0x1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * amd_hfi_online() - Enable workload classification on @cpu
+ * @cpu: CPU in which the workload classification will be enabled
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
+ */
+static int amd_hfi_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct amd_hfi_cpuinfo *hfi_info = per_cpu_ptr(&amd_hfi_cpuinfo, cpu);
+	struct amd_hfi_classes *hfi_classes;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hfi_info))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check if @cpu as an associated, initialized and ranking data must be filled
+	 */
+	hfi_classes = hfi_info->amd_hfi_classes;
+	if (!hfi_classes)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&hfi_cpuinfo_lock);
+
+	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&hfi_info->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, hfi_info->cpus);
+
+	ret = amd_hfi_set_state(cpu, true);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_err("WCT enable failed for CPU %d\n", cpu);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * amd_hfi_offline() - Disable workload classification on @cpu
+ * @cpu: CPU in which the workload classification will be disabled
+ *
+ * Remove @cpu from those covered by its HFI instance.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
+ */
+static int amd_hfi_offline(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct amd_hfi_cpuinfo *hfi_info = &per_cpu(amd_hfi_cpuinfo, cpu);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!hfi_info))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&hfi_cpuinfo_lock);
+
+	ret = amd_hfi_set_state(cpu, false);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_err("WCT disable failed for CPU %d\n", cpu);
+
+	free_cpumask_var(hfi_info->cpus);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int update_hfi_ipcc_scores(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -340,6 +416,11 @@  static int amd_hfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/amd_hfi:online",
+				amd_hfi_online, amd_hfi_offline);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
 	return 0;
 }