Message ID | 20250321023602.2609614-2-wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | RFC, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: NUMA: debug invalid unused PXM value for CFMWs | expand |
Yuquan Wang wrote: > With numa_add_reserved_memblk(), kernel could add numa_memblk into > numa_reserved_meminfo directly. > > In previous, such process relies on numa_add_memblk() adding to > numa_meminfo list first and then uses numa_move_tail_memblk() to > move one from numa_meminfo to numa_reserved_meminfo. I would explicitly state the motivation and the use case for the patch. --- acpi_parse_cfmws() currently adds empty CFMWS ranges to numa_meminfo with the expectation that numa_cleanup_meminfo moves them to numa_reserved_meminfo. There is no need for that indirection when it is known in advance that these unpopulated ranges are meant for numa_reserved_meminfo in suppot of future hotplug / CXL provisioning. --- > > Signed-off-by: Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn> > --- > include/linux/numa_memblks.h | 1 + > mm/numa_memblks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h > index dd85613cdd86..991076cba7c5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h > +++ b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct numa_meminfo { > }; > > int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end); > +int __init numa_add_reserved_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end); > void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi); > > int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi); > diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c > index ff4054f4334d..e70c76cc46dd 100644 > --- a/mm/numa_memblks.c > +++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c > @@ -200,6 +200,22 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end) > return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo); > } > > +/** > + * numa_add_reserved_memblk - Add one numa_memblk to numa_reserved_meminfo > + * @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk > + * @start: Start address of the new memblk > + * @end: End address of the new memblk > + * > + * Add a new memblk to the numa_reserved_meminfo. I would say a bit more here about when to use this function. Something like: "numa_cleanup_meminfo() reconciles all numa_memblk instances against memblock_type information and moves any that intersect reserved ranges to numa_reserved_meminfo. However, when that information is known ahead of time add the numa_memblk to numa_reserved_meminfo directly." With those 2 suggestions you can add: Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h index dd85613cdd86..991076cba7c5 100644 --- a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h +++ b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct numa_meminfo { }; int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end); +int __init numa_add_reserved_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end); void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi); int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi); diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c index ff4054f4334d..e70c76cc46dd 100644 --- a/mm/numa_memblks.c +++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c @@ -200,6 +200,22 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end) return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo); } +/** + * numa_add_reserved_memblk - Add one numa_memblk to numa_reserved_meminfo + * @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk + * @start: Start address of the new memblk + * @end: End address of the new memblk + * + * Add a new memblk to the numa_reserved_meminfo. + * + * RETURNS: + * 0 on success, -errno on failure. + */ +int __init numa_add_reserved_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end) +{ + return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_reserved_meminfo); +} + /** * numa_cleanup_meminfo - Cleanup a numa_meminfo * @mi: numa_meminfo to clean up
With numa_add_reserved_memblk(), kernel could add numa_memblk into numa_reserved_meminfo directly. In previous, such process relies on numa_add_memblk() adding to numa_meminfo list first and then uses numa_move_tail_memblk() to move one from numa_meminfo to numa_reserved_meminfo. Signed-off-by: Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn> --- include/linux/numa_memblks.h | 1 + mm/numa_memblks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)