From patchwork Mon Aug 12 13:16:21 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 13760568 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl (cloudserver094114.home.pl [79.96.170.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E071D699; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.96.170.134 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723468610; cv=none; b=bpOfuzNPTX1W1d/YSr02xGeWeBDJGMyf655N0WpXrd9mLkhlURnvZjw6R9p9rgTH4AKGnsSScfbTpVDtSJg4R79BcVRfADlvP0TYqNsiQo8D/wK0NlRvygpNLDLol1Pt2+0Kjd+5/JgRxjpc+gBkjidNIeGBno6qeB7bN6J5TzE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723468610; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DEqs3SmQqBRuBVI0baBwHJNahYZWYBF10zKRUzqlPMo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rA0dJYSZNQT4Ea8nK1tZo08TvY+EcENFm4v1ia7KoI1juPMzx/ZxK98rGnJzfuZo9X3WEv+tGnFVqZA6K0SuXYhnL4SZT/E7VsqVAsVWpZBLjYZ1L97fkAV+S3ebrft4Ghr12pTOS0gUkg+WuF3YKxhtwK/r8THL7FkCKfDbtNs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rjwysocki.net; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) header.d=rjwysocki.net header.i=@rjwysocki.net header.b=siVimqPw reason="signature verification failed"; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.96.170.134 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rjwysocki.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rjwysocki.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=rjwysocki.net header.i=@rjwysocki.net header.b="siVimqPw" Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (HELO v370.home.net.pl) by /usr/run/smtp (/usr/run/postfix/private/idea_relay_lmtp) via UNIX with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 6.2.0) id 0211acef65f60aac; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:16:46 +0200 Received: from kreacher.localnet (unknown [195.136.19.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cloudserver094114.home.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93CD36F0D95; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:16:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rjwysocki.net; s=dkim; t=1723468606; bh=DEqs3SmQqBRuBVI0baBwHJNahYZWYBF10zKRUzqlPMo=; h=From:Subject:Date; b=siVimqPwQF3SqOyM4Qa9EznGuOZfMyuV9CU4+Z1Sr7vf1d//hHpMfXAmXvJ4bsTc1 Jpc+f0Xh4afanxWDnK1ZBy2Eqm7GvyHP45HYrf9Yd7eUNJ6p4mj9nqEZk7gBHN7zJD jrGbHbyg/U6f2L7IWGWVceXNMUfxX1Dl8l0q4eduYGWUwdtUE4rtZNR5qM89f2aR9X dtT91ouaBHczDkNRFiqYso0Ci8AhNaqYFE2OfISmLl3yzL7z56gCuUCn2PmMkHNl8a pg8KXghrzpIVagOZiXinzhgYpLVAvWlNidoLZc/ZCodlcamsulUE6nN4EYizR32vU5 tGGH2zi5mCW7Q== From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: Hans de Goede , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Armin Wolf Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] ACPI: EC: Evaluate _REG outside the EC scope more carefully Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:16:21 +0200 Message-ID: <23612351.6Emhk5qWAg@rjwysocki.net> In-Reply-To: <22385894.EfDdHjke4D@rjwysocki.net> References: <22385894.EfDdHjke4D@rjwysocki.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CLIENT-IP: 195.136.19.94 X-CLIENT-HOSTNAME: 195.136.19.94 X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddruddttddgiedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecujffqoffgrffnpdggtffipffknecuuegrihhlohhuthemucduhedtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfgrfhgrvghlucflrdcuhgihshhotghkihdfuceorhhjfiesrhhjfiihshhotghkihdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuefgfeefieeileekheffheeigefftddtueehgeejgfethfevffdvfeeuffetgfefnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmnecukfhppeduleehrddufeeirdduledrleegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepudelhedrudefiedrudelrdelgedphhgvlhhopehkrhgvrggthhgvrhdrlhhotggrlhhnvghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepfdftrghfrggvlhculfdrucghhihsohgtkhhifdcuoehrjhifsehrjhifhihsohgtkhhirdhnvghtqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdgrtghpihesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehhuggvghhovgguvgesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqkhgvrhhnvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprhgrfhgrvghlsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeifpggrrhhmihhnsehgmhigrdguvg X-DCC--Metrics: v370.home.net.pl 1024; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 From: Rafael J. Wysocki Commit 60fa6ae6e6d0 ("ACPI: EC: Install address space handler at the namespace root") caused _REG methods for EC operation regions outside the EC device scope to be evaluated which on some systems leads to the evaluation of _REG methods in the scopes of device objects representing devices that are not present and not functional according to the _STA return values. Some of those device objects represent EC "alternatives" and if _REG is evaluated for their operation regions, the platform firmware may be confused and the platform may start to behave incorrectly. To avoid this problem, only evaluate _REG for EC operation regions located in the scopes of device objects representing known-to-be-present devices. For this purpose, partially revert commit 60fa6ae6e6d0 and trigger the evaluation of _REG for EC operation regions from acpi_bus_attach() for the known-valid devices. Fixes: 60fa6ae6e6d0 ("ACPI: EC: Install address space handler at the namespace root") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/1f76b7e2-1928-4598-8037-28a1785c2d13@redhat.com Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2298938 Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302253 Reported-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/acpi/ec.c | 11 +++++++++-- drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 + drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -1530,12 +1530,13 @@ static bool install_gpio_irq_event_handl static int ec_install_handlers(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct acpi_device *device, bool call_reg) { - acpi_handle scope_handle = ec == first_ec ? ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT : ec->handle; acpi_status status; acpi_ec_start(ec, false); if (!test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EC_HANDLER_INSTALLED, &ec->flags)) { + acpi_handle scope_handle = ec == first_ec ? ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT : ec->handle; + acpi_ec_enter_noirq(ec); status = acpi_install_address_space_handler_no_reg(scope_handle, ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC, @@ -1549,7 +1550,7 @@ static int ec_install_handlers(struct ac } if (call_reg && !test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EC_REG_CALLED, &ec->flags)) { - acpi_execute_reg_methods(scope_handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX, ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC); + acpi_execute_reg_methods(ec->handle, ACPI_UINT32_MAX, ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC); set_bit(EC_FLAGS_EC_REG_CALLED, &ec->flags); } @@ -1764,6 +1765,12 @@ static void acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_d } } +void acpi_ec_register_opregions(struct acpi_device *adev) +{ + if (first_ec && first_ec->handle != adev->handle) + acpi_execute_reg_methods(adev->handle, 1, ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC); +} + static acpi_status ec_parse_io_ports(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context) { Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/internal.h =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/internal.h +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/internal.h @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ int acpi_ec_add_query_handler(struct acp acpi_handle handle, acpi_ec_query_func func, void *data); void acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit); +void acpi_ec_register_opregions(struct acpi_device *adev); #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP void acpi_ec_flush_work(void); Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -2271,6 +2271,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_d if (device->handler) goto ok; + acpi_ec_register_opregions(device); + if (!device->flags.initialized) { device->flags.power_manageable = device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D0].flags.valid;