Message ID | 4f89c4b91cc918302a9d5a7eedfa39259a5583bb.1559127603.git.nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | PWM framework: add support referencing PWMs from ACPI | expand |
On 5/29/19 7:18 AM, Nikolaus Voss wrote: > DT specific handling is replaced by firmware-node abstration to support > ACPI specification of PWM LEDS. > > Example ASL: > Device (PWML) > { > Name (_HID, "PRP0001") > Name (_DSD, Package () { > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > Package () { Package () {"compatible", > Package () {"pwm-leds"}}}}) > > Device (PWL0) > { > Name (_HID, "PRP0001") > Name (_DSD, Package () { > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > Package () { > Package () {"label", "alarm-led"}, > Package () {"pwms", Package () > {\_SB_.PCI0.PWM, 0, 600000, 0}}, > Package () {"linux,default-state", "off"}}}) > } > } > > Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> > --- > drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c > index af08bcdc4fd8..cc717dd6a12c 100644 > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline size_t sizeof_pwm_leds_priv(int num_leds) > } > > static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, > - struct led_pwm *led, struct device_node *child) > + struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > { > struct led_pwm_data *led_data = &priv->leds[priv->num_leds]; > struct pwm_args pargs; > @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, > led_data->cdev.max_brightness = led->max_brightness; > led_data->cdev.flags = LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME; > > - if (child) > - led_data->pwm = devm_of_pwm_get(dev, child, NULL); > + if (fwnode) > + led_data->pwm = devm_fwnode_pwm_get(dev, fwnode, NULL); > else > led_data->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, led->name); > if (IS_ERR(led_data->pwm)) { > @@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, > if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0)) > led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns; > > - ret = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, child, &led_data->cdev); > + ret = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, to_of_node(fwnode), > + &led_data->cdev); > if (ret == 0) { > priv->num_leds++; > led_pwm_set(&led_data->cdev, led_data->cdev.brightness); > @@ -126,27 +127,34 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, > return ret; > } > > -static int led_pwm_create_of(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv) > +static int led_pwm_create_fwnode(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv) > { > - struct device_node *child; > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > struct led_pwm led; > int ret = 0; > > memset(&led, 0, sizeof(led)); > > - for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) { > - led.name = of_get_property(child, "label", NULL) ? : > - child->name; > + device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) { > + ret = fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "label", &led.name); > + if (ret && is_of_node(fwnode)) > + led.name = to_of_node(fwnode)->name; new line > + if (!led.name) { > + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); > + return -EINVAL; > + } 'label' is an optional parameter for device tree returning here makes it required. Maybe derive a default name. There is a patch series which is going to modify how labels are created for LED class devices. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=391005 > > - led.default_trigger = of_get_property(child, > - "linux,default-trigger", NULL); > - led.active_low = of_property_read_bool(child, "active-low"); > - of_property_read_u32(child, "max-brightness", > - &led.max_brightness); > + fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "linux,default-trigger", > + &led.default_trigger); > > - ret = led_pwm_add(dev, priv, &led, child); > + led.active_low = fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode, > + "active-low"); > + fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "max-brightness", > + &led.max_brightness); > + > + ret = led_pwm_add(dev, priv, &led, fwnode); > if (ret) { > - of_node_put(child); > + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); > break; > } > } > @@ -164,7 +172,7 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (pdata) > count = pdata->num_leds; > else > - count = of_get_child_count(pdev->dev.of_node); > + count = device_get_child_node_count(&pdev->dev); > > if (!count) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -182,7 +190,7 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > break; > } > } else { > - ret = led_pwm_create_of(&pdev->dev, priv); > + ret = led_pwm_create_fwnode(&pdev->dev, priv); > } > > if (ret)
Dan, On Thu, 30 May 2019, Dan Murphy wrote: > > On 5/29/19 7:18 AM, Nikolaus Voss wrote: >> DT specific handling is replaced by firmware-node abstration to support >> ACPI specification of PWM LEDS. >> >> Example ASL: >> Device (PWML) >> { >> Name (_HID, "PRP0001") >> Name (_DSD, Package () { >> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), >> Package () { Package () {"compatible", >> Package () {"pwm-leds"}}}}) >> >> Device (PWL0) >> { >> Name (_HID, "PRP0001") >> Name (_DSD, Package () { >> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), >> Package () { >> Package () {"label", "alarm-led"}, >> Package () {"pwms", Package () >> {\_SB_.PCI0.PWM, 0, 600000, 0}}, >> Package () {"linux,default-state", "off"}}}) >> } >> } >> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> >> --- >> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c >> index af08bcdc4fd8..cc717dd6a12c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c >> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c >> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline size_t sizeof_pwm_leds_priv(int num_leds) >> } >> >> static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, >> - struct led_pwm *led, struct device_node *child) >> + struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) >> { >> struct led_pwm_data *led_data = &priv->leds[priv->num_leds]; >> struct pwm_args pargs; >> @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, >> led_data->cdev.max_brightness = led->max_brightness; >> led_data->cdev.flags = LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME; >> >> - if (child) >> - led_data->pwm = devm_of_pwm_get(dev, child, NULL); >> + if (fwnode) >> + led_data->pwm = devm_fwnode_pwm_get(dev, fwnode, NULL); >> else >> led_data->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, led->name); >> if (IS_ERR(led_data->pwm)) { >> @@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, >> if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0)) >> led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns; >> >> - ret = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, child, &led_data->cdev); >> + ret = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, to_of_node(fwnode), >> + &led_data->cdev); >> if (ret == 0) { >> priv->num_leds++; >> led_pwm_set(&led_data->cdev, led_data->cdev.brightness); >> @@ -126,27 +127,34 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, >> return ret; >> } >> >> -static int led_pwm_create_of(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv) >> +static int led_pwm_create_fwnode(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv) >> { >> - struct device_node *child; >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; >> struct led_pwm led; >> int ret = 0; >> >> memset(&led, 0, sizeof(led)); >> >> - for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) { >> - led.name = of_get_property(child, "label", NULL) ? : >> - child->name; >> + device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) { >> + ret = fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "label", &led.name); >> + if (ret && is_of_node(fwnode)) >> + led.name = to_of_node(fwnode)->name; > > new line ok > > >> + if (!led.name) { >> + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } > > 'label' is an optional parameter for device tree returning here makes it > required. > > Maybe derive a default name. There is a patch series which is going to > modify how labels are created for LED class devices. > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=391005 Looks interesting, thanks for the pointer. But that would be a second step. My patch handles name derivation the same way as the leds-gpio driver already does. I think it should be handled consistently among drivers of the same sub-system. Nikolaus
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c index af08bcdc4fd8..cc717dd6a12c 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline size_t sizeof_pwm_leds_priv(int num_leds) } static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, - struct led_pwm *led, struct device_node *child) + struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) { struct led_pwm_data *led_data = &priv->leds[priv->num_leds]; struct pwm_args pargs; @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, led_data->cdev.max_brightness = led->max_brightness; led_data->cdev.flags = LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME; - if (child) - led_data->pwm = devm_of_pwm_get(dev, child, NULL); + if (fwnode) + led_data->pwm = devm_fwnode_pwm_get(dev, fwnode, NULL); else led_data->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, led->name); if (IS_ERR(led_data->pwm)) { @@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0)) led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns; - ret = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, child, &led_data->cdev); + ret = devm_of_led_classdev_register(dev, to_of_node(fwnode), + &led_data->cdev); if (ret == 0) { priv->num_leds++; led_pwm_set(&led_data->cdev, led_data->cdev.brightness); @@ -126,27 +127,34 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, return ret; } -static int led_pwm_create_of(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv) +static int led_pwm_create_fwnode(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv) { - struct device_node *child; + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; struct led_pwm led; int ret = 0; memset(&led, 0, sizeof(led)); - for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) { - led.name = of_get_property(child, "label", NULL) ? : - child->name; + device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) { + ret = fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "label", &led.name); + if (ret && is_of_node(fwnode)) + led.name = to_of_node(fwnode)->name; + if (!led.name) { + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); + return -EINVAL; + } - led.default_trigger = of_get_property(child, - "linux,default-trigger", NULL); - led.active_low = of_property_read_bool(child, "active-low"); - of_property_read_u32(child, "max-brightness", - &led.max_brightness); + fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode, "linux,default-trigger", + &led.default_trigger); - ret = led_pwm_add(dev, priv, &led, child); + led.active_low = fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode, + "active-low"); + fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "max-brightness", + &led.max_brightness); + + ret = led_pwm_add(dev, priv, &led, fwnode); if (ret) { - of_node_put(child); + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); break; } } @@ -164,7 +172,7 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (pdata) count = pdata->num_leds; else - count = of_get_child_count(pdev->dev.of_node); + count = device_get_child_node_count(&pdev->dev); if (!count) return -EINVAL; @@ -182,7 +190,7 @@ static int led_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) break; } } else { - ret = led_pwm_create_of(&pdev->dev, priv); + ret = led_pwm_create_fwnode(&pdev->dev, priv); } if (ret)
DT specific handling is replaced by firmware-node abstration to support ACPI specification of PWM LEDS. Example ASL: Device (PWML) { Name (_HID, "PRP0001") Name (_DSD, Package () { ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package () { Package () {"compatible", Package () {"pwm-leds"}}}}) Device (PWL0) { Name (_HID, "PRP0001") Name (_DSD, Package () { ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package () { Package () {"label", "alarm-led"}, Package () {"pwms", Package () {\_SB_.PCI0.PWM, 0, 600000, 0}}, Package () {"linux,default-state", "off"}}}) } } Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de> --- drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)