From patchwork Tue Sep 24 10:03:23 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yanfei Zhang X-Patchwork-Id: 2933171 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-acpi@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5D1BFF05 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA8E20445 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196512043C for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754008Ab3IXKEN (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 06:04:13 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:29137 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752809Ab3IXKEL (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 06:04:11 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,969,1371052800"; d="scan'208";a="8606623" Received: from unknown (HELO tang.cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.250.3]) by song.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2013 18:00:55 +0800 Received: from fnstmail02.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com (tang.cn.fujitsu.com [127.0.0.1]) by tang.cn.fujitsu.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r8OA450q017314; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:04:06 +0800 Received: from [10.167.226.121] ([10.167.226.121]) by fnstmail02.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3) with ESMTP id 2013092418022500-1733121 ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:02:25 +0800 Message-ID: <5241636B.2060206@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:03:23 +0800 From: Zhang Yanfei User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , lenb@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , mingo@elte.hu, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Toshi Kani , Wanpeng Li , Thomas Renninger , Yinghai Lu , Jiang Liu , Wen Congyang , Lai Jiangshan , isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, Rik van Riel , jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com CC: Zhang Yanfei , "x86@kernel.org" , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux MM , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, imtangchen@gmail.com, Zhang Yanfei Subject: [PATCH 1/6] memblock: Factor out of top-down allocation References: <524162DA.30004@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <524162DA.30004@cn.fujitsu.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/09/24 18:02:25, Serialize by Router on mailserver/fnst(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 2013/09/24 18:02:27, Serialize complete at 2013/09/24 18:02:27 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_BIG_TO_CC, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Tang Chen This patch imports a new function __memblock_find_range_rev to factor out of top-down allocation from memblock_find_in_range_node. This is a preparation because we will introduce a new bottom-up allocation mode in the following patch. Signed-off-by: Tang Chen Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei Acked-by: Tejun Heo --- mm/memblock.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 0ac412a..3d80c74 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -83,33 +83,25 @@ static long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, } /** - * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node + * __memblock_find_range_rev - find free area utility, in reverse order * @start: start of candidate range * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE} * @size: size of free area to find * @align: alignment of free area to find * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node * - * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node. + * Utility called from memblock_find_in_range_node(), find free area top-down. * * RETURNS: * Found address on success, %0 on failure. */ -phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, - phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size, - phys_addr_t align, int nid) +static phys_addr_t __init_memblock +__memblock_find_range_rev(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, + phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid) { phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand; u64 i; - /* pump up @end */ - if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE) - end = memblock.current_limit; - - /* avoid allocating the first page */ - start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE); - end = max(start, end); - for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(i, nid, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) { this_start = clamp(this_start, start, end); this_end = clamp(this_end, start, end); @@ -121,10 +113,39 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, if (cand >= this_start) return cand; } + return 0; } /** + * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node + * @start: start of candidate range + * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE} + * @size: size of free area to find + * @align: alignment of free area to find + * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node + * + * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node. + * + * RETURNS: + * Found address on success, %0 on failure. + */ +phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, + phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size, + phys_addr_t align, int nid) +{ + /* pump up @end */ + if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE) + end = memblock.current_limit; + + /* avoid allocating the first page */ + start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE); + end = max(start, end); + + return __memblock_find_range_rev(start, end, size, align, nid); +} + +/** * memblock_find_in_range - find free area in given range * @start: start of candidate range * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}