diff mbox

WARNING at kernel/workqueue.c:829 wq_worker_waking_up+0x53/0x70()

Message ID 5306150C.4020202@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

lan,Tianyu Feb. 20, 2014, 2:45 p.m. UTC
On 02/20/2014 10:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:28:26PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> On 02/19/2014 06:49 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>> acpi_processor_set_throttling() plays with set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current),
>>>> this is obviously wrong, and the worker is bound.
>>>
>>> Umm... yeah, anything running on workqueues shouldn't be diddling with
>>> cpu affinity.  The function even has /* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */ in
>>> it.  I suppose it's about time to actually implement that?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jiri:
>> 	Could you try this patch which reworks ACPI processor throttling
>> with work_on_cpu()?
>
> hum, I've got difficulties to apply it..
>
> [jolsa@krava2 linux-perf]$ git am /tmp/wq/
> Applying: WARNING at kernel/workqueue.c:829 wq_worker_waking_up+0x53/0x70()
> fatal: corrupt patch at line 8
> Patch failed at 0001 WARNING at kernel/workqueue.c:829 wq_worker_waking_up+0x53/0x70()
>
> jirka
>
Sorry. Please try the attachment again.

Comments

Jiri Olsa Feb. 20, 2014, 2:53 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:45:32PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 02/20/2014 10:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:28:26PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >>On 02/19/2014 06:49 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>>>acpi_processor_set_throttling() plays with set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current),
> >>>>this is obviously wrong, and the worker is bound.
> >>>
> >>>Umm... yeah, anything running on workqueues shouldn't be diddling with
> >>>cpu affinity.  The function even has /* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */ in
> >>>it.  I suppose it's about time to actually implement that?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Hi Jiri:
> >>	Could you try this patch which reworks ACPI processor throttling
> >>with work_on_cpu()?
> >
> >hum, I've got difficulties to apply it..
> >
> >[jolsa@krava2 linux-perf]$ git am /tmp/wq/
> >Applying: WARNING at kernel/workqueue.c:829 wq_worker_waking_up+0x53/0x70()
> >fatal: corrupt patch at line 8
> >Patch failed at 0001 WARNING at kernel/workqueue.c:829 wq_worker_waking_up+0x53/0x70()
> >
> >jirka
> >
> Sorry. Please try the attachment again.

np, this one got applied cleanly ;-)

I started the workload.. it took several hours to hit
it before, I'll let you know

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Oleg Nesterov Feb. 20, 2014, 3:13 p.m. UTC | #2
On 02/20, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>
> @@ -1096,7 +1112,6 @@ int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>
> -	cpumask_copy(saved_mask, &current->cpus_allowed);

Yes, but the patch forgets to kill alloc_cpumask_var(&saved_mask)
and saved_mask itself ;)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Oleg Nesterov Feb. 20, 2014, 3:17 p.m. UTC | #3
On 02/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 02/20, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >
> > @@ -1096,7 +1112,6 @@ int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	cpumask_copy(saved_mask, &current->cpus_allowed);
>
> Yes, but the patch forgets to kill alloc_cpumask_var(&saved_mask)
> and saved_mask itself ;)

And it seems that acpi_processor_set_throttling() doesn't need
online_throttling_cpus at all. It could use
for_each_cpu_and(cpu_online_mask, p_throttling->shared_cpu_map).

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lan,Tianyu Feb. 21, 2014, 2:34 a.m. UTC | #4
On 02/20/2014 11:17 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> On 02/20, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -1096,7 +1112,6 @@ int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>>>   		return -ENODEV;
>>>   	}
>>>
>>> -	cpumask_copy(saved_mask, &current->cpus_allowed);
>>
>> Yes, but the patch forgets to kill alloc_cpumask_var(&saved_mask)
>> and saved_mask itself ;
>
> And it seems that acpi_processor_set_throttling() doesn't need
> online_throttling_cpus at all. It could use
> for_each_cpu_and(cpu_online_mask, p_throttling->shared_cpu_map).
>


Yes, oops and will update soon. Thanks.


> Oleg.
>
diff mbox

Patch

From 058dc817636186d1e9ccadfa7a2409aaeb1458f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:42:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI/Processor: Rework processor throttling with
 work_on_cpu()

---
 drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
index 28baa05..a21a37d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
@@ -1060,6 +1060,23 @@  static int acpi_processor_set_throttling_ptc(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct acpi_processor_throttling_arg {
+	struct acpi_processor *pr;
+	int target_state;
+	bool force;
+};
+
+static long acpi_processor_throttling_fn(void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_processor_throttling_arg *arg = data;
+	struct acpi_processor *pr = arg->pr;
+	struct acpi_processor_throttling *p_throttling = &pr->throttling;
+
+	return p_throttling->acpi_processor_set_throttling(pr,
+			arg->target_state, arg->force);
+}
+
+
 int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 						int state, bool force)
 {
@@ -1068,6 +1085,7 @@  int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 	unsigned int i;
 	struct acpi_processor *match_pr;
 	struct acpi_processor_throttling *p_throttling;
+	struct acpi_processor_throttling_arg arg;
 	struct throttling_tstate t_state;
 	cpumask_var_t online_throttling_cpus;
 
@@ -1083,10 +1101,8 @@  int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&saved_mask, GFP_KERNEL))
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&online_throttling_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) {
-		free_cpumask_var(saved_mask);
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&online_throttling_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
 
 	if (cpu_is_offline(pr->id)) {
 		/*
@@ -1096,7 +1112,6 @@  int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	cpumask_copy(saved_mask, &current->cpus_allowed);
 	t_state.target_state = state;
 	p_throttling = &(pr->throttling);
 	cpumask_and(online_throttling_cpus, cpu_online_mask,
@@ -1118,14 +1133,10 @@  int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 	 * it can be called only for the cpu pointed by pr.
 	 */
 	if (p_throttling->shared_type == DOMAIN_COORD_TYPE_SW_ANY) {
-		/* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */
-		if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(pr->id))) {
-			/* Can't migrate to the pr->id CPU. Exit */
-			ret = -ENODEV;
-			goto exit;
-		}
-		ret = p_throttling->acpi_processor_set_throttling(pr,
-						t_state.target_state, force);
+		arg.pr = pr;
+		arg.target_state = state;
+		arg.force = force;
+		ret = work_on_cpu(pr->id, acpi_processor_throttling_fn, &arg);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * When the T-state coordination is SW_ALL or HW_ALL,
@@ -1153,13 +1164,12 @@  int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 					"on CPU %d\n", i));
 				continue;
 			}
-			t_state.cpu = i;
-			/* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */
-			if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(i)))
-				continue;
-			ret = match_pr->throttling.
-				acpi_processor_set_throttling(
-				match_pr, t_state.target_state, force);
+
+			arg.pr = match_pr;
+			arg.target_state = state;
+			arg.force = force;
+			ret = work_on_cpu(pr->id, acpi_processor_throttling_fn,
+				&arg);
 		}
 	}
 	/*
@@ -1173,12 +1183,8 @@  int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 		acpi_processor_throttling_notifier(THROTTLING_POSTCHANGE,
 							&t_state);
 	}
-	/* restore the previous state */
-	/* FIXME: use work_on_cpu() */
-	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, saved_mask);
-exit:
+
 	free_cpumask_var(online_throttling_cpus);
-	free_cpumask_var(saved_mask);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.2.1