| Message ID | 1626316157-24935-1-git-send-email-kewei.xu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Due to changes in hardware design, add patch to | expand |
Hi, On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:37 AM Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > 1. In order to facilitate the review, the two series of patches submitted > before have been integrated together. I'm not sure that really helps. We'll see. > 2. Resubmit a patch to fixing the incorrect register value. Fixes can be submitted separately, or at the very least, put at the very front of the series. > 3. Add modify bus speed calculation formula patch When resubmitting patch series, please add appropriate versioning and changelogs. This will help maintainers understand that this is a new version of the series, and what has changed. This includes times when the original patches weren't changed, but additional patches were added. Please also keep the original series subject, which IIRC was about adding support for MT8195 I2C. The subject you now used should be part of the cover letter. If you combine different patch series, you should use the highest version number + 1. Regards ChenYu > > Kewei Xu (8): > dt-bindings: i2c: update bindings for MT8195 SoC > i2c: mediatek: Dump i2c/dma register when a timeout occurs > i2c: mediatek: fixing the incorrect register offset > i2c: mediatek: Reset the handshake signal between i2c and dma > i2c: mediatek: Add OFFSET_EXT_CONF setting back > dt-bindings: i2c: add attribute default-timing-adjust > i2c: mediatek: Isolate speed setting via dts for special devices > i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula > > .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt | 3 + > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 229 +++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 11:03 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:37 AM Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > 1. In order to facilitate the review, the two series of patches submitted > > before have been integrated together. > > I'm not sure that really helps. We'll see. > > > 2. Resubmit a patch to fixing the incorrect register value. > > Fixes can be submitted separately, or at the very least, put at the very > front of the series. > > > 3. Add modify bus speed calculation formula patch > > When resubmitting patch series, please add appropriate versioning and > changelogs. This will help maintainers understand that this is a new > version of the series, and what has changed. This includes times when > the original patches weren't changed, but additional patches were added. > > Please also keep the original series subject, which IIRC was about adding > support for MT8195 I2C. The subject you now used should be part of the > cover letter. > > If you combine different patch series, you should use the highest version > number + 1. > > > Regards > ChenYu > > > > > Kewei Xu (8): > > dt-bindings: i2c: update bindings for MT8195 SoC > > i2c: mediatek: Dump i2c/dma register when a timeout occurs > > i2c: mediatek: fixing the incorrect register offset > > i2c: mediatek: Reset the handshake signal between i2c and dma > > i2c: mediatek: Add OFFSET_EXT_CONF setting back > > dt-bindings: i2c: add attribute default-timing-adjust > > i2c: mediatek: Isolate speed setting via dts for special devices > > i2c: mediatek: modify bus speed calculation formula > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.txt | 3 + > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 229 +++++++++++++++++++-- > > 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-mediatek mailing list > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek Hi ChenYu, 2. OK, I will place the fixes at the very least in the next patch. 3. I will take your opinion combine different patch series, you should use the highest version number +1. I have submitted two different series of patches before. The topics are "Add i2c support for mt8195" (highest version number: V1) and "Introduce an attribute to select timing settings" (highest version number:V3). Later I will combine the above two series of patches and submit V4 with "Introducing an attribute to select the time setting" as the subject title. Thanks Regards Kewei