Message ID | 20181231185517.18517-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC | expand |
Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2018-12-31 10:55:11) > Hello, > > This patchset adds common clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC of > the Owl family SoCs. This series is based on the initial work done > by Edgar Bernardi Righi. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10587527/ > > Since there isn't any update from him for long time, I took the liberty > to modify his patches, address review comments and send to list for review. > > This series has been tested on Allo Sparky SBC. > > Thanks, > Mani > > Edgar Bernardi Righi (1): > dt-bindings: clock: Add DT bindings for Actions Semi S500 CMU > > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5): > clk: actions: Add configurable PLL delay > ARM: dts: Add CMU support for Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC > ARM: dts: Remove fake UART clock for S500 based SBCs > clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC > MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi What's the merge strategy for these patches? Some are for clk, others are for arm-soc, etc. I see a sandwich of patches too so it sounds like I can't even take just the clk ones for fear of breaking something that the dts bits in the middle clear out of the way.
Hi Stephen, On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2018-12-31 10:55:11) > > Hello, > > > > This patchset adds common clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC of > > the Owl family SoCs. This series is based on the initial work done > > by Edgar Bernardi Righi. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10587527/ > > > > Since there isn't any update from him for long time, I took the liberty > > to modify his patches, address review comments and send to list for review. > > > > This series has been tested on Allo Sparky SBC. > > > > Thanks, > > Mani > > > > Edgar Bernardi Righi (1): > > dt-bindings: clock: Add DT bindings for Actions Semi S500 CMU > > > > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5): > > clk: actions: Add configurable PLL delay > > ARM: dts: Add CMU support for Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC > > ARM: dts: Remove fake UART clock for S500 based SBCs > > clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC > > MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi > > What's the merge strategy for these patches? Some are for clk, others > are for arm-soc, etc. I see a sandwich of patches too so it sounds like > I can't even take just the clk ones for fear of breaking something that > the dts bits in the middle clear out of the way. > As we did with previous patchsets, clk patches will go through your tree and I'll take the ARM/MAINTAINERS patches through Actions sub-tree. Let's target these for 5.1. Even if your patches reach first, there won't be any regression with existing DTS. Thanks, Mani
Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-01-14 01:18:50) > Hi Stephen, > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2018-12-31 10:55:11) > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patchset adds common clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC of > > > the Owl family SoCs. This series is based on the initial work done > > > by Edgar Bernardi Righi. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10587527/ > > > > > > Since there isn't any update from him for long time, I took the liberty > > > to modify his patches, address review comments and send to list for review. > > > > > > This series has been tested on Allo Sparky SBC. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mani > > > > > > Edgar Bernardi Righi (1): > > > dt-bindings: clock: Add DT bindings for Actions Semi S500 CMU > > > > > > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5): > > > clk: actions: Add configurable PLL delay > > > ARM: dts: Add CMU support for Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC > > > ARM: dts: Remove fake UART clock for S500 based SBCs > > > clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC > > > MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi > > > > What's the merge strategy for these patches? Some are for clk, others > > are for arm-soc, etc. I see a sandwich of patches too so it sounds like > > I can't even take just the clk ones for fear of breaking something that > > the dts bits in the middle clear out of the way. > > > > As we did with previous patchsets, clk patches will go through your tree > and I'll take the ARM/MAINTAINERS patches through Actions sub-tree. Let's > target these for 5.1. Even if your patches reach first, there won't be > any regression with existing DTS. > Ok. I have just minor nits. Please resend and I will merge the clk patches to clk tree.