Message ID | 20190507034734.20622-1-leo.yan@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | dts: Update DT bindings for CoreSight replicator and funnel | expand |
Leo, On 07/05/2019 04:47, Leo Yan wrote: > Since the DT bindings consolidatoins for CoreSight replicator and funnel > is ready for kernel v5.2 merge window [1], this patch set is to update > the related CoreSight DT bindings for platforms; IIUC, this patch set > will be safe for merging into kernel v5.2 because the dependency > patches in [1] will be landed into mainline kernel v5.2 cycle. > > In this patch set, it tries to update below two compatible strings to > the latest strings: > > s/"arm,coresight-replicator"/"arm,coresight-static-replicator" > s/"arm,coresight-funnel"/"arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel" > > Please note, some platforms have two continuous patches, one is for > updating static replicator compatible string and another is for dynamic > funnel change; and other platforms have only one patch since it only > needs to change for dynamic funnel. I would have preferred to keep them as a single change. Either way, for the entire series : Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:27:26AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Leo, > > On 07/05/2019 04:47, Leo Yan wrote: > > Since the DT bindings consolidatoins for CoreSight replicator and funnel > > is ready for kernel v5.2 merge window [1], this patch set is to update > > the related CoreSight DT bindings for platforms; IIUC, this patch set > > will be safe for merging into kernel v5.2 because the dependency > > patches in [1] will be landed into mainline kernel v5.2 cycle. > > > > In this patch set, it tries to update below two compatible strings to > > the latest strings: > > > > s/"arm,coresight-replicator"/"arm,coresight-static-replicator" > > s/"arm,coresight-funnel"/"arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel" > > > > Please note, some platforms have two continuous patches, one is for > > updating static replicator compatible string and another is for dynamic > > funnel change; and other platforms have only one patch since it only > > needs to change for dynamic funnel. > > I would have preferred to keep them as a single change. Either way, for > the entire series : > > Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Thanks. Leo, I plan to take 9,10,14/17 for v5.3 Please shout if you plan to take the series directly via different tree. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:46:12AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:27:26AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > Leo, > > > > On 07/05/2019 04:47, Leo Yan wrote: > > > Since the DT bindings consolidatoins for CoreSight replicator and funnel > > > is ready for kernel v5.2 merge window [1], this patch set is to update > > > the related CoreSight DT bindings for platforms; IIUC, this patch set > > > will be safe for merging into kernel v5.2 because the dependency > > > patches in [1] will be landed into mainline kernel v5.2 cycle. > > > > > > In this patch set, it tries to update below two compatible strings to > > > the latest strings: > > > > > > s/"arm,coresight-replicator"/"arm,coresight-static-replicator" > > > s/"arm,coresight-funnel"/"arm,coresight-dynamic-funnel" > > > > > > Please note, some platforms have two continuous patches, one is for > > > updating static replicator compatible string and another is for dynamic > > > funnel change; and other platforms have only one patch since it only > > > needs to change for dynamic funnel. > > > > I would have preferred to keep them as a single change. Either way, for > > the entire series : > > > > Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > Thanks. Thanks, Suzuki and Sudeep. > Leo, > > I plan to take 9,10,14/17 for v5.3 Yes, please pick up these 3 patches. Thanks, Leo Yan > Please shout if you plan to take the series directly via different tree. > > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep
Hi Sudeep, On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:16:04PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: [...] > > I plan to take 9,10,14/17 for v5.3 > > Yes, please pick up these 3 patches. I am planning to respin new patch set with more clear explaination in the commit log. Please let me know if it's okay for you to wait for new patch set, or will you directly pick up these three patches and I should drop these 3 patches in next version? Thanks, Leo Yan
On 07/05/2019 14:24, Leo Yan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:16:04PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > [...] > >>> I plan to take 9,10,14/17 for v5.3 >> >> Yes, please pick up these 3 patches. > > I am planning to respin new patch set with more clear explaination in > the commit log. > > Please let me know if it's okay for you to wait for new patch set, or > will you directly pick up these three patches and I should drop these > 3 patches in next version? Leo, If you do respin, please could you merge the separate patches for funnel and replicator per DTS into a single patch. Cheers Suzuki
Hi Suzuki, On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 04:06:32PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: [...] > Leo, > > If you do respin, please could you merge the separate patches for funnel and > replicator per DTS into a single patch. Okay, will do it. Thanks, Leo Yan